Filter This View

  • April 1, 2013 | Litigation Daily

    Wilmer Scores Rare Section 101 Patent Win in East Texas

    Back in October we described a spate of lower court rulings based on Section 101 of the Patent Act, which stands for the idea that ab

    1 minute read

  • September 19, 2000 | Corporate Counsel

    Behind the Music

    Baseball and MTV: What could be more American? But the Japanese and Cubans are baseball fanatics, too.And MTV -- the heartbeat of U.S. youth culture -- now has a bigger audience outsid

    1 minute read

  • October 9, 2007 | Legal Times

    Alston & Bird a World Apart From DLA Piper

    A few months ago, William Cook found himself in India -- New Delhi, to be exact -- speaking with a manager for his firm's second-largest client. They were, thankfully, in an air-conditioned confere

    1 minute read

  • September 1, 2005 | New York Law Journal

    Corporate Crime

    On July 27, 2005, a Seattle federal judge sentenced the so-called "Millennium Bomber," who was convicted of conspiring to bomb Los Angeles International Airport during the 2000 New Year's holi

    1 minute read

  • November 17, 2000 | National Law Journal

    Lawyers Take Center Stage

    When historians look back on the contentious presidential election of 2000, they may surprise many of today's critics who say that too much of the titanic political struggle has been controlle

    1 minute read

  • October 6, 2005 | Legal Times

    One Lawyer's Amazonian Adventure

    Intellectual property attorneys are used to bucking the odds when suing companies for patent infringement. But for James Gatto, a partner at Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, one court battle h

    1 minute read

  • Arechiga v. Dolores Press, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2011-02-07
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-02-07
    Court: C.A. 2nd
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Law Offices of Stephen Glick, Stephen Glick and Anthony Jenkins, for Plaintiff and Appellant.
    for defendant: Glaser, Weil, Fink, Jacobs, Howard & Shapiro, Amman A. Khan and Elliott S. Henry, for Defendant and Respondent.
    Case Number: No. B218171

    Cite as 11 C.D.O.S. 1733CARLOS ARECHIGA, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. DOLORES PRESS, INC., Defendant and Respond

  • May 24, 2010 | The American Lawyer

    WaMu Plan Gets FDIC's Approval, but Bondholders Still Angry

    Last week, when we reported that Washington Mutual Inc., the parent company of Washington Mutual Bank, had filed a new global settlement with a Delaware bankruptcy court, a href="http://bit.ly/9RH18m

    1 minute read

  • Movado Group, Inc., Plaintiff v. Caseiko Trading Company, Inc. Et Al, Defendants, 12 Civ. 0855

    Publication Date: 2012-12-24
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: United States, Southern District
    Judge: District Judge J. Paul Oetken
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 12 Civ. 0855

    Cite as: Movado Group, Inc. v. Caseiko Trading Co., Inc., 12 Civ. 0855, NYLJ 1202582171470, at *1 (SDNY, Decided December 11, 2012)District Judge J. Paul

  • April 21, 2003 | New York Law Journal

    Moreover, it can not be said that Defendant's negligence is the only reasonable inference which could be drawn from the evidence. The inference that the turning of the car alone caused the cof

    1 minute read