• Rubin v. Garvin

    Publication Date: 2008-10-06
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-09-29
    Court: 2nd Cir.
    Judge: Feinberg, Circuit Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 06-1614-pr

    Argued: March 26, 2008Before: FEINBERG and HALL, Circuit Judges, and SAND, District Judge.*fn1Petitioner-appellant, who was convicted in New York state court of

  • May 3, 2013 | New York Law Journal

    More Developments in Prosecutorial Immunity

    The last Section 1983 Litigation column (March 5, 2013) focused on recent decisions concerning

    1 minute read

  • March 1, 2013 | The American Lawyer

    Playing Not to Lose

    The members of any collective—whether citizens of a country or em ployees of a company—have essentially two possible responses when they perceive that the colle

    1 minute read

  • Young-Gibson v. Patel, 08-CV-667

    Publication Date: 2013-07-23
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Western District
    Judge: District Judge William Skretny
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 08-CV-667

    Cite as: Young-Gibson v. Patel, 08-CV-667, NYLJ 1202611600321, at *1 (WDNY, Decided July 12, 2013) 08-CV-667 District Judge William Skretnyp

  • Dow Jones Co. Inc. v. International Securities Exchange Inc., 05-4812-cv

    Publication Date: 2006-06-27
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2006-06-16
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
    Judge: Pierre Leval
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 05-4812-cv

    U.S. COURT OF APPEALS SECOND CIRCUIT For Plaintiff-Appellant Dow Jones & Company, Inc.: Robert P. Lobue, Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP (Stuart A. Karle, Gen

  • October 26, 2005 |

    Moving Computer Chips Beyond Moore's Law

    Simple physics has rendered Moore's Law obsolete. Well, not exactly, at least not just yet, but the famous dictum from Intel Corp. co-founder Gordon Moore that microprocessing chips will double in

    1 minute read

  • March 3, 2005 | New York Law Journal

    Matrimonial Practice

    Last time, this column (The New York Law Journal, Jan. 7, 2005, at p. 3) posited that the Daubert1 principles could contribute toward taming the chaos of the custody evaluati

    1 minute read

  • James v. Von Zemenszky

    Publication Date: 2002-04-02
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2002-04-01
    Court: Fed. Cir.
    Judge: Bryson, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 00-3418

    Appealed from: Merit Systems Protection BoardThe issue in this case is whether the Department of Veterans Affairs may separate a physician from her position in the agency without complying with the

  • April 2, 2007 | New York Law Journal

    Public Interest Law

    Federal court claims asserted under 42 USC �1983 can give rise to sticky stat

    1 minute read

  • Estate of Tyesha Johnson v. Edwards, 500218/2010

    Publication Date: 2013-09-26
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court, Kings County, IAS Term, Part 45
    Judge: Justice Ann T. Pfau
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Plaintiff was represented by Anthony T. Dipietro, Esq. of Anthony T. Dipietro, P.C.
    for defendant: Defendant Enzo Clinical Labs was represented by Heather Laschewer, Esq., of Kaufman Borgeest & Ryan, LLP Defendants Gary Markoff, MD and Lexington OB/GYN PC were represented by Lawrence Rosenblatt, Esq., of Aaronson, Rappaport, Feinstein & Deustschm

    Case Number: 500218/2010

    Cite as: Estate of Tyesha Johnson v. Edwards, 500218/2010, NYLJ 1202620538065, at *1 (Sup., KI, Decided September 18, 2013) 500218/2010 Justice An