• Ellins v. City of Sierra Madre

    Publication Date: 2013-03-22
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2013-03-22
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: Consuelo B. Marshall, Senior District Judge, Presiding Before: Kim McLane Wardlaw, Richard A. Paez, and Johnnie B. Rawlinson, Circuit Judges.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Michael A. Morguess, and Carolina V. Diaz, Lackie, Dammeier & McGill, APC, Upland, California, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
    for defendant: Elizabeth M. Kessel and Scott E. Boyer, Kessel & Associates, Los Angeles, California, for Defendants-Appellees.

    Case Number: No. 11-55213

    Cite as 13 C.D.O.S. 3257JOHN ELLINS, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.CITY OF SIERRA MADRE, A Municipality; MARILYN D

  • February 20, 2006 | New Jersey Law Journal

    New Partners Yearbook 2006

    Editor's Note Once again, we present the vanguard of leadership of the New Jersey legal community: 178 newly minted partners who accepted our invitation to be featured in this,

    1 minute read

  • February 1, 2000 | The Recorder

    Steps Forward

    Law firms are making progress -- slow progress, but progress nevertheless -- when it comes to boosting women and attorneys of color to partner. Nationally, from 1991 to 1998, the proportio

    1 minute read

  • People v. Sutton

    Publication Date: 2010-04-05
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-04-05
    Court: Ca. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Attorneys for Respondent: Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorney General, Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Pamela C. Hamanaka, Assistant Attorney General, Steven D. Matthews, Lawrence M. Daniels and David E. Madeo, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent. Steve Cooley, District Attorney (Los Angeles), Irene Wakabayashi, Head Deputy District Attorney, Phyllis C. Asayama and Shirley S. N. Sun, Deputy District Attorneys, for District Attorney of Los Angeles County as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Respondent.
    for defendant: Attorneys for Appellant: William L. Heyman, under appointment by the Supreme Court, for Defendant and Appellant Michael Jerome Sutton. J. Courtney Shevelson, under appointment by the Supreme Court, and Jennifer L. Peabody, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant Willie J. Jackson. Michael P. Judge, Public Defender (Los Angeles) and John Hamilton Scott, Deputy Public Defender for Public Defender of Los Angeles County as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Appellants.

    Case Number: No. S166402

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 4173THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v.MICHAEL JEROME SUTTON et al., Defendants

  • City of New York v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp.

    Publication Date: 2005-12-08
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number:

    U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Judge Weinstein I. Introduction The City of New York ("City") sues the main suppliers of handguns in the Uni

  • January 2, 2002 | The Recorder

    Sept. 11 Victims Prove To Be Grateful Pro Bono Clients

    William Voge isn't used to getting phone calls from clients praising his work. After all, the senior Latham & Watkins partner primarily works for investment bankers who pay f

    1 minute read

  • June 25, 2010 | The Recorder

    Focus Groups Give White Collar Cases a Gut Check

    SAN FRANCISCO — Before defending McAfee Inc.'s former general counsel at trial, Cooley partner Stephen Neal did what most white-collar lawyers would these days: He reached for an outside

    1 minute read

  • March 13, 2012 | The Recorder

    Antitrust Prosecutors Win Convictions at Trial in LCD Case

    SAN FRANCISCO — Federal prosecutors on Tuesday won convictions against a leading manufacturer of TFT-LCD panels, AU Optronics Corp., and two of its top executives after a rare criminal

    1 minute read

  • July 7, 2008 | National Law Journal

    Plaintiffs Score With E-Mail Evidence in Multidistrict Price-Fixing Case

    What began last week as a class certification hearing on one of five national, high-tech price-fixing cases pending in San Francisco became a big score for plaintiffs after the judge asked what eviden

    1 minute read