• February 25, 2013 | Legaltech News

    Legal Tech Reactions to Obama Cybersecurity Order

    President Obama's cybersecurity executiveorder, released February 12, had legal technology experts split in their opinions.The order (a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-offic

    1 minute read

  • October 1, 2007 | Connecticut Law Tribune

    Firms Pump Up Salaries

    There's generally more money to be had by first-year associates, but there's no greater number of rookies grabbing that cash as hiring numbers were fairly flat among Connecticut's largest law

    1 minute read

  • June 6, 2013 | The American Lawyer

    Wilmer Seeks Rocky Mountain High by Snagging Salazar

    Kenneth Salazar, a fifth-generation Coloradan with ranching roots, is taking his a target="_blank" href="http://voices

    1 minute read

  • November 15, 2011 | The Recorder

    'Brinker' at The Supreme Court

    On Nov. 8, the California Supreme Court heard oral argument in Brinker Restaurant Corporation, et al. v. Superior Court (Hohnbaum) (Sup. Ct. Case No. S166350). The case raises a variety of f

    1 minute read

  • August 28, 2006 | National Law Journal

    Tort reform's next big push

    Tort reform groups and lawyers representing some of the nation's largest corporations are working with legislators in several states to draft amendments to consumer protection laws that

    1 minute read

  • October 19, 2012 | Connecticut Law Tribune

    Supreme Court Next Step For DOMA?

    Leaders of the Connecticut Bar Association were on the winning side of the legal fight for federal benefits for same-sex couples last week, when a divided U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second

    1 minute read

  • United States v. Thomas

    Publication Date: 2013-08-08
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2013-08-08
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: Cindy K. Jorgenson, District Judge, Presiding Before: Alfred T. Goodwin, Diarmuid F. O'Scannlain, and N. Randy Smith, Circuit Judges.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Bruce M. Ferg, Assistant United States Attorney, District of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, argued the cause and filed a brief for the appellee. With him on the brief were John S. Leonardo, United States Attorney, and Christina M. Cabanillas, Appellate Chief, District of Arizona.
    for defendant: Brian I. Rademacher, Assistant Federal Public Defender, District of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, argued the cause and filed the briefs for the appellant. With him on the briefs were Jon M. Sands, Federal Public Defender, and Richard W. Raynor, Assistant Federal Public Defender, District of Arizona.

    Case Number: No. 11-10451

    Cite as 13 C.D.O.S. 8632 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JONATHAN MICHA

  • June 10, 2002 | New York Law Journal

    Joining E-Mail With Knowledge Management

    Across the country, law firms' pricey knowledge-management initiatives may finally be starting to pay off. Everywhere, firms are assembling searchable troves of "best practice" documents containing

    1 minute read

  • Teitelbaum v. Wagner

    Publication Date: 2003-03-10
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number:

    Judge Stanton TEITELBAUM v. WAGNER — In this action for the sale of the PTR Company’s sole asset, an accounting and its dissolution as a partnership, the single present issue

  • November 4, 2002 | Daily Business Review

    Snuffed Out

    The legal options of foreign governments seeking to hold tobacco companies responsible for the costs of treating sick smokers are quickly narrowing. The latest constriction came from Florida's

    1 minute read