• I.M.S. Inquiry Management Systems, Ltd., Plaintiff v. Berkshire Information Systems, Inc., Defendant, 03 Civ. 2183(NRB)

    Publication Date: 2012-11-21
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
    Judge: District Judge Naomi Buchwald
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Plaintiff: Robert W. Clarida, Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, P.C., New York City.
    for defendant: For Defendant: Patrick T. Perkins, Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C., New York City.

    Case Number: 03 Civ. 2183(NRB)

    Cite as: I.M.S. Inquiry Management Systems, Ltd. v. Berkshire Information Systems, Inc., 03 Civ. 2183(NRB), NYLJ 1202579104011, at *1 (SDNY, Decided February 23, 2004)p cl

  • April 19, 2011 | The American Lawyer

    IBM, Represented by Goodwin Procter, Wins Rights To Patents on Employee's Invention

    Companies looking to claim ownership of the inventions of their employees got a boost on Monday when Manhattan federal district court Judge John Koeltl held that IBM owns three patents on an inve

    1 minute read

  • October 12, 2012 | The Recorder

    Judge Vacates Jury Verdict in LCD Case to Clear Path for Settlement

    SAN FRANCISCO — A San Francisco federal judge has agreed to vacate an $87 million jury verdict to pave the way for the final settlement in a class action over price-fixing in the LCD fla

    1 minute read

  • June 29, 2011 | Daily Report Online

    Lane: 'Tell me what you want'

    More than an hour into a free-wheeling interview that's covered everything from her "goody two-shoes" youth to her latest passion-motorcycles-Fulton County Superior Court Judge Bensonetta Tip

    1 minute read

  • March 2, 2006 | Daily Report Online

    Portrait of a New Partner

    Piece together the observable components of Atlanta's typical new partner, and you get someone a lot like Sutherland Asbill & Brennan's Avital "Avi" Stadler.Granted, some new partners ma

    1 minute read

  • October 2, 2006 | The American Lawyer

    How a Global 100 Firm Became a Profit Powerhouse

    In addition to purchasing an equity stake in their firm, most new partners at the English law firm Slaughter and May buy a napkin ring, too. After Slaughter partners finish their lunch in th

    1 minute read

  • January 15, 2009 | Legal Times

    Report: Politics, ideology drove hiring in DOJ's civil rights branch

    A report released this week by the Justice Department's two watchdogs says the former head of the Civil Rights Division routinely violated federal law and department policy by using political

    1 minute read

  • Dicon Fiberoptics, Inc. v. Franchise Tax Board

    Publication Date: 2012-04-26
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-04-26
    Court: Ca. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Bird, Marella, Boxer, Wolpert, Nessim, Drooks & Lincenberg, Thomas R. Freeman, Paul S. Chan; Dakessian Law Firm, Akerman Senterfitt, Reed Smith, Mardiros H. Dakessian; The California Credits Group, LaShelle T. Wilson and Mark Danscecs for Plaintiff and Appellant. Winston & Strawn, Charles J. Moll III, Krista M. Enns and Linda T. Coberly for California Taxpayers? Association as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Appellant. Silverstein & Pomerantz, Amy L. Silverstein and Edwin P. Antolin for Deluxe Corp. as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Appellant.
    for defendant: Edmund G. Brown, Jr., and Kamala D. Harris, Attorneys General, David S. Chaney and Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorneys General, Gordon Burns, State Deputy Solicitor General, Paul D. Gifford and Pamela C. Hamanaka, Assistant Attorneys General, W. Dean Freeman, Felix E. Leatherwood, Mark P. Richelson and Ronald N. Ito, Deputy Attorneys General, for Defendant and Respondent.

    Case Number: No. S173860

    Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 4569 DICON FIBEROPTICS, INC. Plaintiff and Appellant, v. FRANCHISE TAX BOARD, Defendan

  • April 9, 2012 | National Law Journal

    Bankruptcy judge shortage looms

    Federal bankruptcy Judge Arthur Gonzalez spent 16 years presiding over a busy docket and huge reorganization cases like Enron and Chrysler, but he had one more big decision to make last

    1 minute read

  • November 5, 2008 | Legal Times

    Justices and lawyers debate TV expletives, without uttering any

    The Supreme Court appeared far from a consensus Tuesday on whether the Federal Communication Commission's crackdown on broadcasters who allow "fleeting expletives" to reach the airwaves shoul

    1 minute read