Filter This View

  • People v. Lou

    Publication Date: 2002-11-26
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 2nd Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 2001-01383

    SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT 1934f C/nl AD2d Submitted - October 28, 2002 ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P.

  • November 3, 2000 |

    Excerpt from the EPA's Opening Brief in 'American Trucking'

    No. 99-1257In the Supreme Court of the United StatesCAROL M. BROWNER, ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,ET AL., PETITIONERSv.AMERICAN TRUCKING ASSOCIATIONS, INC., ET

    1 minute read

  • December 28, 2009 | Texas Lawyer

    Comment on Disciplinary Rules' Proposed Amendments

    On Oct. 20, the Texas Supreme Court issued broad and extensive proposed amendments to the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct. The court noted that it will accept public comments about

    1 minute read

  • February 25, 2010 | Daily Report Online

    Deal Watch: Jones Day leads deal on Nextel Mexico

    Jones Day partner Maria F. Farall of Atlanta was one of a team of attorneys advising NII Holdings Inc. in a $1.44 billion cash agreement with Grupo Televisa, S.A.B., the largest media company

    1 minute read

  • October 24, 2005 | National Law Journal

    DLA Piper challenges concepts of law firm growth

    In the 10 months since DLA Piper Rudnick Gray Cary was formed from a three-way merger, the firm has opened six new offices-stateside in Raleigh, N.C., and internationally in Frankfurt, G

    1 minute read

  • June 1, 2011 | Legaltech News

    Golden State

    For those of us who like the "next big thing" in technology, we are living in a golden era. There is an almost limitless supply of new technology heading our way, designed to make our job

    1 minute read

  • July 13, 2006 | New York Law Journal

    Tax Tips

    In recent years, the proliferation of S corporations has been somewhat eclipsed by the growing popularity of limited liability companies (LLCs). Still, S corporations continue to abou

    1 minute read

  • February 22, 2010 | The Legal Intelligencer

    Guilty or Not, Defendant May Forfeit Property

    When determining whether a forfeiture constitutes an excessive fine, a trial court judge may weigh the value of the seized item against that of the maximum penalty available in criminal court

    1 minute read

  • July 31, 2007 | The Legal Intelligencer

    Rohm & Haas faces medical monitoring suit

    Predicting that the Supreme Court of Illinois "is likely to recognize" a claim for medical monitoring, a federal judge in Philadelphia has refused to dismiss a class action suit brought by resident

    1 minute read

  • August 9, 1999 |

    Substitute Doctor Case Hits the Pa. High Court. Again.

    The Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether a plaintiff can seek punitive damages because the doctor who performed an operation wasn't the one the patient was expecting.The Superior Court

    1 minute read