• Laumann v. National Hockey League, 12 Civ. 1817 (SAS)

    Publication Date: 2014-01-14
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
    Judge: Judge Shira A. Scheindlin
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Plaintiffs: Edward A. Diver, Esq., Howard I. Langer, Esq., Peter E. Leckman, Esq., Langer Grogan & Diver, P.C., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
    for defendant: Kevin M. Costello, Esq., Gary E. Klein, Esq., Klein Kavanagh Costello, LLP, Boston, Massachusetts Michael Morris Buchman, Esq., John A. Ioannou, Esq., Pomerantz Haudek Block Grossman & Gross LLP, New York, New York Alex Schmidt, Esq., Mary Jane Fait, Esq., Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP, New York, New York. Robert LaRocca, Esq., Kohn, Swift & Graf, P.C., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania J. Douglas Richards, Esq., Jeffrey Dubner, Esq., Cohen, Milstein, Sellers & Toll, PLLC, New York, New York For Defendants DIRECTV, LLC, DIRECTV Sports Networks, LLC, DIRECTV Sports Net Pittsburgh, LLC a/k/a Root Sports Pittsburgh, DIRECTV Sports Net Rocky Mountain, LLC a/k/a Root Sports Rocky Mountain, and DIRECTV Sports Net Northwest, LLC a/k/a Root Sports Northwest: Andrew E. Paris, Esq., Joann M. Wakana, Esq., Louis A. Karasik, Esq., Alston & Bird LLP, Los Angeles, California For Defendants Comcast Corporation, Comcast SportsNet Philadelphia, L.P., Comcast SportsNet Mid-Atlantic L.P., Comcast SportsNet California, LLC, and Comcast SportsNet Chicago, LLC: Arthur J. Burke, Esq., James W. Haldin, Esq., Davis Polk & Wardwell, New York, New York

    Case Number: 12 Civ. 1817 (SAS)

    Cite as: Laumann v. National Hockey League, 12 Civ. 1817 (SAS), NYLJ 1202637997031, at *1 (SDNY, Decided November 25, 2013) 12 Civ. 1817 (SAS) Jud

  • December 19, 2013 |

    Cincinnati Ins. Co. v. Devon Int'l, Inc.

    Click Here for FC&S Legal Expert AnalysisCincinnati Ins. Co.v.Devon Int'l, Inc. 924 F.Supp.2d 587United States District Court,E.D. Pennsylvania.CINCINNATI…

    1 minute read

  • Travis v. Murray, 308310/13

    Publication Date: 2013-12-11
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court, New York County, Part 51
    Judge: Justice Matthew F. Cooper
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For the Plaintiff: Rhonda J. Panken, Esq., New York, NY.
    for defendant: For the Defendant: Sherri Donovan, Esq., New York, NY.

    Case Number: 308310/13

    Cite as: Travis v. Murray, 308310/13, NYLJ 1202631512607, at *1 (Sup., NY, Decided November 29, 2013) 308310/13 Justice Matthew F. Cooperp cl

  • Louisetravis v. Murray, 308310/13

    Publication Date: 2013-12-05
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court, New York County, Part 51
    Judge: Justice Matthew F. Cooper
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For the Plaintiff: Rhonda J. Panken, Esq., New York, NY.
    for defendant: For the Defendant: Sherri Donovan, Esq., New York, NY.

    Case Number: 308310/13

    Cite as: Louisetravis v. Murray, 308310/13, NYLJ 1202630756290, at *1 (Sup. NY, Decided November 29, 2013) 308310/13 Justice Matthew F. Co

  • In re R.T.

    Publication Date: 2001-05-24
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-05-22
    Court: Pa. Super. Ct.
    Judge: Montemuro, J.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 1694 MDA 1999,,

    J. A14035/01� 1 Mother, G.A., and Father, K.A., appeal the Order entered September 2, 1999 in the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas declaring their children C.A. and K.A., as well as Mother's

  • Beta Spawn, Inc. v. FFE Transportation Services, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2001-05-17
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-05-15
    Court: 3rd Cir.
    Judge: Kravitch, Circuit Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 00-1332

    Argued on March 8, 2001OPINION OF THE COURTFFE Transportation Services, Inc. ("FFE") appeals from the judgment of the district court finding FFE liable to Beta Spawn, Inc. for the value of a shi

  • September 2, 2008 | New York Law Journal

    Dissecting Consumer Class Action Bans

    Consumers may find class action lawsuits to be potent weapons when their products fail to perform exactly as advertised. Consumer class actions effectively aggregate into a single lawsui

    1 minute read

  • Nabors Drilling, U.S.A., Inc. v. Caescoto

    Publication Date: 2009-06-22
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-06-19
    Court: Tx. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: Justice Green
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 06-0890

    Argued February 5, 2008Employers in Texas generally do not owe a duty to third parties for the tortious activities of off-duty employees occurring off the work site. Loram Maint. of Way, Inc. v. Ia