Filter This View

  • Duran v. Barnhart

    Publication Date: 2003-01-21
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    Judge Gorenstein DECISION OF INTEREST DURAN v. BARNHART — Plaintiff Rosa Duran brings this action pursuant to section 205(g) of the Social Security Act (the “Act”), 42

  • Matter of Frantrae W.

    Publication Date: 2007-11-20
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 1st Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 2173

    Lippman, P.J., Mazzarelli, Marlow, Catterson, Kavanagh, JJ. 2173 In re Frantrae W. and Another, Children Under the Age of Eighteen Years, etc., and Fred W., Responde

  • State v. John G.

    Publication Date: 2007-04-11
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Connecticut Appellate Court
    Judge: Bishop
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: AC 25504

  • In re Alante M.

    Publication Date: 2006-02-28
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 1st Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    By Buckley, P.J., Andrias, Friedman, Marlow, Gonzalez, JJ. 7720. In re Alante M., A Dependent Child Under the Age of Eighteen Years, etc., Thomasina M., res-ap, Ange

  • People v. Cortes

    Publication Date: 2011-02-11
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-02-11
    Court: C.A. 6th
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Attorneys for Respondent: Edmund G. Brown Jr., Attorney General, Gerald A. Engler, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Rene A. Chacon, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, David M. Baskind, Deputy Attorney General
    for defendant: Attorney for Appellant: Steven Schorr (Under appointment by the Court of Appeal)
    Case Number: No. H032799

    Cite as 11 C.D.O.S. 1977THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. LEOPOLDO ALEJANDRO CORTES, Defendant and Appel

  • Curtis v. County of Los Angeles

    Publication Date: 2013-07-31
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2013-07-30
    Court: C.A. 2nd
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Greene, Broillet & Wheeler, Geoffrey S. Wells, Tobin M. Lanzetta; Esner, Chang & Boyer, Stuart B. Esner, and Andrew N. Chang for Plaintiffs and Appellants.
    for defendant: Collins Collins Muir + Stewart, Melinda W. Ebelhar, Christian E. Foy Nagy, and Erin R. Dunkerly for Defendant and Respondent.
    Case Number:

    Cite as 13 C.D.O.S. 8212 PAUL CURTIS et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. COUNTY OF L

  • December 6, 2004 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Bensel v. Allied Pilots Association et al

    U.S. Third Circuit No. 03-3176; Third Circuit; opinion by Van Antwerpen, U.S.C.J.; dissent by Fisher, U.S.C.J.; filed October 26, 2004. Before Judges Rendell, Fis

    1 minute read

  • October 5, 2010 | The Legal Intelligencer

    House-Approved Natural Gas Tax a Starting Point

    The state House of Representatives approved an extraction tax on natural gas drilled in Pennsylvania that both Republican and Democrats said would end up being little more than a starting point for

    1 minute read

  • Kona Technology Corp. v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.

    Publication Date: 2000-09-15
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2000-09-13
    Court: 5th Cir.
    Judge: BARKSDALE, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: No. 99-20128

    The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion. CARL E. STEWART, Circuit Judge: FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORYI. Factual BackgroundThis case involves a comp

  • Addicks Services, Inc. v. GGP-Bridgeland, LP

    Publication Date: 2010-03-17
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-02-08
    Court: 5th Cir.
    Judge: King, Circuit Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 09-20155

    Published opinionREVISED MARCH 8, 2010Before KING, GARZA, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.In this contract action, plaintiff--appellant is a contractor seeking damages for extra work and delay cos