Filter This View

  • Gilman v. Schwarzenegger

    Publication Date: 2011-01-24
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-12-06
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: Lawrence K. Karlton, Senior District Judge, Presiding Before: Susan P. Graber, Consuelo M. Callahan, and Carlos T. Bea, Circuit Judges.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Daniel J. Broderick, Federal Defender, and David Porter and Monica Knox (argued), Assistant Federal Defenders, Sacramento, California, for the plaintiffs-appellees.
    for defendant: Terence J. Cassidy, Michael W. Pott (argued), and Thomas L. Riordan, Porter Scott, Sacramento, California, for the defendants-appellants.
    Case Number: No. 10-15471

    Cite as 11 C.D.O.S. 994RICHARD M. GILMAN, JAMES MASONER, RICHARD W. BROWN, CHRIS FOWLER, EDWARD STEWART, MARIO MARQUEZ, RICHARD LEWIS, and GLORIA OLSON, Plainti

  • Olivieri v GM Realty Company, LLC

    Publication Date: 2007-02-13
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 2nd Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    MILLER, J.P., SPOLZINO, FISHER and DILLON, JJ. Concetta Olivieri, et al., appellants, v GM Realty Company, LLC, respondent. (Index No. 5692/03) Marino D'Oraz

  • August 4, 2003 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Who Ate the Cookies, Mom or the Children?

    For years, lawyers have relied on the court-sanctioned Case Information Statement to present their client's financial picture to the court. However, over 12 years ago, Justice Virginia Long re

    1 minute read

  • Gagliardi v. American Suzuki Motor Corporation

    Publication Date: 2003-03-31
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 2nd Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 2002-02466

    APPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT 3657f T/cf AD2d Argued - March 13, 2003 MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, J.P. NANCY E. SMITH LEO F. McGINITY STEPHEN G

  • In Re NewPower Holdings Inc. Securities Litigation

    Publication Date: 2003-04-30
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    Judge Brient IN RE: NEWPOWER HOLDINGS, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION — In this private securities fraud class action regulated by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (PSLRA)

  • Church of Scientology Int'l v. Behar

    Publication Date: 2001-01-19
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-01-12
    Court: 2nd Cir.
    Judge: WALKER, Chief Judge, CABRANES and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: BURT NEUBORNE, et al.
    for defendant: FLOYD ABRAMS, et al.
    Case Number: No. 98-9522

    The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion. JOHN M. WALKER, JR., Chief Judge:Plaintiff-appellant Church of Scientology International ("CSI") appeals from judg

  • May 1, 2012 | Corporate Counsel

    Deals & Suits

    Apollo El Paso Exploration and Production Apollo Global Management, LLC, teamed with Riverstone Holdings LLC and Access Industries, Inc., on a $7.15 billion agreement to buy

    1 minute read

  • In re Nicole H.

    Publication Date: 2004-11-04
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 1st Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    By Mazzarelli, J.P., Williams, Friedman, Gonzalez, Catterson, JJ. 4534-4534A In re Nicole H. and Another, Children Under the Age of Eighteen Years, etc., Keesha H., res-ap,

  • In re Kirk V.

    Publication Date: 2005-02-17
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 1st Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    By Tom, J.P., Andrias, Ellerin, Gonzalez, Catterson, JJ. 5395. In re Kirk V., A Child Under the Age of Eighteen Years, etc., Providencia V. res-res, Commissioner of the Admi

  • August 12, 1999 | New York Law Journal

    Second Circuit Denies Challenge to ADA

    The U.S. Court of Appealsfor the Second Circuit has joined four other federal circuits in rulingthat Congress, when it passed the Americans with Disabilities Act, didnot exceed its power by abrogat

    1 minute read