• Yantha v. Omni Childhood Center, 13-CV-1948

    Publication Date: 2013-09-30
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Eastern District
    Judge: District Judge Allyne Ross
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 13-CV-1948

    Cite as: Yantha v. Omni Childhood Center, 13-CV-1948, NYLJ td class="form-label

  • November 22, 2004 | Daily Business Review

    Court Secrecy Practices at Center of Drug Boss's 11th Circuit Appeal

    In a case that's being closely watched by civil libertarians, journalists and the criminal defense bar, lawyers for convicted Colombian narcotics boss Fabio Ochoa have attacked his 2003 convic

    1 minute read

  • Educational Media Co. at Virginia Tech, Inc. v. Swecker

    Publication Date: 2010-04-21
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-04-09
    Court: 4th Cir.
    Judge: Shedd, Circuit Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 08-1798

    PUBLISHEDArgued: October 29, 2009Before SHEDD, Circuit Judge, HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge, and Norman K. MOON, United States District Judge for the Western District of Virginia, sitting by de

  • May 13, 2003 | New York Law Journal

    Pollux Holding Ltd. v. The Chase Manhattan Bank

    Pollux Holding Ltd. v. The Chase Manhattan Bank court of appealsBy Walker, Ch.J.; Cardamone and Straub, C.JJ.Pollux Holding Ltd. v. The Chase Manhattan Bank - Pl

    1 minute read

  • February 19, 2010 | Daily Business Review

    Court clarifies role of ISPs in child pornography cases

    Internet service providers that tip authorities to images of child pornography they intercept are not agents of the government and thus are not obligated to obtain a search warrant, a New Yor

    1 minute read

  • Singh v. Arbor Property Trust

    Publication Date: 2004-11-29
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 2nd Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number:

    By Florio, J.P.; Schmidt, Mastro and Fisher, JJ. Peter Singh, appellant, v. Arbor Property Trust, et al., defendants third-party plaintiffs-respondents; All Pets Dis

  • Man Ferrostaal, Inc. v. M/V Akili

    Publication Date: 2012-12-19
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
    Judge: Before: Winter, Katzmann, and Lynch, CJJ.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant: Steven P. Calkins, Kingsley Kingsley & Calkins, Hicksville, NY.
    for defendant: For Defendant-Cross-Claimant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee: Vincent M. Deorchis, Deorchis & Partners, LLP, New York, NY.

    Case Number: 11-0486-cv(L)

    Cite as: Man Ferrostaal, Inc. v. M/V Akili, 11-0486-cv(L), NYLJ 1202582025709, at *1 (2d Cir., Decided December 6, 2012)Before: Winter, Katzmann, and Lync

  • Jones v Sallie Mae Servicing Corp.

    Publication Date: 2007-02-27
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 2nd Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number:

    MILLER, J.P., SPOLZINO, RITTER and LIFSON, JJ. Daryll Jones, appellant, v Sallie Mae Servicing Corp., et al., respondents. (Index No. 11565/05) Daryll Boyd J

  • In re T.V.

    Publication Date: 2013-06-14
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2013-05-29
    Court: C.A. 4th
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Thomas E. Montgomery, County Counsel, John E. Philips, Chief Deputy County Counsel and Lisa Maldonado, Deputy County Counsel, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
    for defendant: Patti L. Dikes, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

    Case Number: No. D063023

    Cite as 13 C.D.O.S. 6069In re T.V., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. SAN DIEGO COUNTY HEALTH AND HUMAN SERV

  • Reid v. Google, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2010-08-05
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-08-05
    Court: Ca. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: No. S158965

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 10019BRIAN REID, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. GOOGLE, INC., Defendant and Respondent.p