Filter This View

  • June 26, 2013 | New Jersey Law Journal

    New Jersey Courts General Assignment Order

    SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY It is ORDERED that the following judges of the Appellate Division, Law Division (Civil and Criminal), and Chancery Division (General Equity and Family) of

    1 minute read

  • September 20, 2013 | New Jersey Law Journal

    On The Move

    1 minute read

  • October 6, 2008 |

    News in Brief

    In a one-line order, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court affirmed a Commonwealth Court ruling that told an appellate judge in no uncertain terms that she couldn't give back the controversial pay raise t

    1 minute read

  • November 24, 2009 | The Legal Intelligencer

    Two Huge Verdicts in Hormone Replacement Therapy Litigation

    A Philadelphia jury returned a $28 million punitive damages verdict Monday against two drugmakers over the drugmakers' hormone-replacement therapy drugs that the jury found caused a plaintiff

    1 minute read

  • December 30, 2008 | The Legal Intelligencer

    A Quiet Year Punctuated by Key Decisions

    Though it operated short a judge for nearly half of 2008, the Commonwealth Court rarely shied away from tackling head-on the largest issues before it. Judges on the court denied Philadelphia

    1 minute read

  • February 16, 2004 | New Jersey Law Journal

    N.J. Appeal Tests Liability of Firms When Contract Partners Are Sued

    A state appeals court has been asked to decide, in a case against ex-judge Andrew Napolitano, whether partnerships are automatically liable for malpractice by contract lawyers -- even when the

    1 minute read

  • Dicon Fiberoptics, Inc. v. Franchise Tax Board

    Publication Date: 2012-04-26
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-04-26
    Court: Ca. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Bird, Marella, Boxer, Wolpert, Nessim, Drooks & Lincenberg, Thomas R. Freeman, Paul S. Chan; Dakessian Law Firm, Akerman Senterfitt, Reed Smith, Mardiros H. Dakessian; The California Credits Group, LaShelle T. Wilson and Mark Danscecs for Plaintiff and Appellant. Winston & Strawn, Charles J. Moll III, Krista M. Enns and Linda T. Coberly for California Taxpayers? Association as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Appellant. Silverstein & Pomerantz, Amy L. Silverstein and Edwin P. Antolin for Deluxe Corp. as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Appellant.
    for defendant: Edmund G. Brown, Jr., and Kamala D. Harris, Attorneys General, David S. Chaney and Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorneys General, Gordon Burns, State Deputy Solicitor General, Paul D. Gifford and Pamela C. Hamanaka, Assistant Attorneys General, W. Dean Freeman, Felix E. Leatherwood, Mark P. Richelson and Ronald N. Ito, Deputy Attorneys General, for Defendant and Respondent.
    Case Number: No. S173860

    Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 4569 DICON FIBEROPTICS, INC. Plaintiff and Appellant, v. FRANCHISE TAX BOARD, Defendan

  • January 3, 2013 | The Legal Intelligencer

    Penn State Abuse Scandal

    View the Freeh Report a href="http://www.law

    1 minute read

  • June 17, 2005 | The Legal Intelligencer

    Dual Fen-Phen Cases Dismissed for Lack Of Doctors' Testimony

    The coordinating judge of Philadelphia's Complex Litigation Center has dismissed two more Fen-Phen cases in which the physicians who originally prescribed the plaintiffs diet drugs were not de

    1 minute read

  • November 24, 2009 | The Legal Intelligencer

    Two Huge Verdicts in Hormone Replacement Therapy Litigation

    A Philadelphia jury returned a $28 million punitive damages verdict Monday against two drugmakers over the drugmakers' hormone-replacement therapy drugs that the jury found caused a plaintiff

    1 minute read