Filter This View

  • May 24, 2013 | New Jersey Law Journal

    On The Move

    img src="/image/nj/128_pics/johnson_nancy.jpg" alt="" style="float: left; margin: 2px 2px 0p

    1 minute read

  • January 21, 2011 | New Jersey Law Journal

    On The Move

    img src="http://www.law.com/image/

    1 minute read

  • October 4, 2006 | The Recorder

    Politics May Prove Chink in Tribal Armor

    SANTA BARBARA � Indian tribes that refuse to disclose campaign contributions given for California elections might soon be defending themselves in state court.During oral arguments Wedn

    1 minute read

  • May 16, 2013 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Unapproved Opinions

     STATE COURT CASES ADMINISTRATIVE LAW — CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION01-2-9947 In the Matter of

    1 minute read

  • November 29, 2007 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Court Blocks End-Run Tactic Often Used To Get Interlocutory Review

    A New Jersey appeals court has issued a stern warning about misuse of certifications of finality to obtain review of orders that are really interlocutory."This case represents another

    1 minute read

  • June 1, 2004 |

    Pickett et al. v. Tyson Fresh Meats Swedish Match North America, Inc., v. U.S. Smokeless Tobacco Company R4 Holdings v. Tickets.

    A group of cattle ranchers upset over corporate control of the meat market received a blue-ribbon antitrust jury verdict in February-only to have a judge sitting in Alabama decide that the jur

    1 minute read

  • July 21, 2004 | The Legal Intelligencer

    Out-of-State Diet Drug Plaintiffs May Sue in Philadelphia

    Dozens of diet drug lawsuits brought by out-of-state plaintiffs against a Montgomery County, Pa.-based division of the pharmaceutical maker Wyeth will remain in Philadelphia Common Pleas Court

    1 minute read

  • June 11, 2007 | The Legal Intelligencer

    Pa. High Court Sides With Lenders Over Arbitration Agreements

    A majority of the state Supreme Court has ruled in favor of the sub-prime lending industry's right to set up loan agreements that force consumers to arbitrate any disputes but allow lenders to

    1 minute read

  • Today's Fresh Start, Inc. v. Los Angeles County Office of Education

    Publication Date: 2013-07-11
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2013-07-11
    Court: Ca. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Doll Amir & Eley, Michael M. Amir, Mary Tesh Glarum, Lloyd Vu and Hemmy So for Plaintiff and Respondent and for Plaintiff and Appellant. Debra J. La Fetra, Damien M. Schiff and Joshua P. Thompson for Pacific Legal Foundation and Options for Youth as Amici Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Respondent and Plaintiff and Appellant. Ricardo J. Soto, Phillipa L. Altmann, Julie Ashby Umansky; McKenna Long & Aldridge and Charles A. Bird for California Charter Schools Association as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Respondent and Plaintiff and Appellant. Amy Bisson Holloway, Edmundo R. Aquilar and Todd M. Smith for State Board of Education, California Department of Education and State Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Torlakson as Amici Curiae.
    for defendant: Vibiana M. Andrade, Sung Yon Lee; Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland, Timothy T. Coates and Alison M. Turner for Defendants and Appellants and for Defendants and Respondents. Best Best & Krieger, Dina Harris and Megan M. Moore for Riverside County Office of Education and San Diego County Office of Education as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Appellants and Defendants and Respondents. David Holmquist and Devora Navera Reed for Los Angeles Unified School District as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Appellants and Defendants and Respondents. Dannis Woliver Kelly, Sue Ann Salmon Evans and William B. Tunick for Education Legal Alliance of the California School Boards Association as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Appellants and Defendants and Respondents.
    Case Number: No. S195852 No. S195852

    Cite as 13 C.D.O.S. 7332 TODAY'S FRESH START, INC., Plaintiff and Respondent, v

  • April 17, 2002 | The Legal Intelligencer

    Dismissal of Doctors` Suit Against HMO Upheld

    In a major victory for the insurance industry, the Pennsylvania Superior Court has upheld the dismissal of a class-action suit brought by specialist doctors who claim that Aetna Inc. and its HMO su

    1 minute read