Filter This View

  • October 3, 2011 | The Recorder

    Courts Brace for Realignment's New Sentencing System

    SACRAMENTO — California on Monday will launch some of the most sweeping changes in sentencing laws over the past four decades as the state shifts significant criminal justice responsibili

    1 minute read

  • November 27, 2006 | New York Law Journal

    Franchising

    Hunting season has opened on the principle of contract sanctity. In a recent decision by the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, a href="http://www.superior.court.state.pa.us/opinions/A07039_0

    1 minute read

  • People v. Cissna

    Publication Date: 2010-02-26
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-02-26
    Court: C.A. 4th
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Edmund G. Brown Jr., Attorney General, Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Gary W. Schons, Assistant Attorney General, Jeffrey J. Koch and Gary W. Brozio, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
    for defendant: Charles M. Sevilla, for Defendant and Appellant.
    Case Number: No. D053464

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 2439THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v.ROBERT ADDISON CISSNA, Defendant and Appe

  • Walnut Producers of California v. Diamond Foods, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2010-08-16
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-08-16
    Court: C.A. 3rd
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Bartko Zankel Tarrant & Miller, Charles G. Miller, Howard I. Miller; Tuttle & Van Konynenburg, Therese Tuttle, Frank Van Konynenburg; Lovitt & Hannan, J. Thomas Hannan, Ronald Lovitt, Henry Bornstein; MacDonald & Associates and Iain A. MacDonald for Plaintiffs and Appellants.
    for defendant: Winston & Strawn, Jeffrey J. Lederman, Jeffrey S. Bosley, and Leda M. Mouallem for Defendant and Respondent.
    Case Number: No. C060346

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 10579WALNUT PRODUCERS OF CALIFORNIA et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. DIAMOND FOODS, IN

  • June 15, 2010 | The Legal Intelligencer

    Tipster History Need Only Be Known to Cops, Court Rules

    It matters not whether a police informant's history is unknown to a suppression court judge, the state Supreme Court has ruled, because police must still corroborate that information before conduct

    1 minute read

  • October 7, 2009 | The Legal Intelligencer

    High Court to Test Extent of Protective Searches

    Setting up a possible test on the limits of protective searches, the state Supreme Court has agreed to hear a case in which police searched a woman's pocketbook during the consensual search of a re

    1 minute read

  • Kern County Department of Human Services v. Superior Court (M.M.)

    Publication Date: 2010-08-10
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-08-09
    Court: C.A. 5th
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: No. F060314

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S 10221KERN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF KERN COU

  • July 25, 2007 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Ford Can't Claim 'Federal Officer' Status in Defense of Landfill Suit

    Ford Motor Co. and other defendants in a suit over landfill contamination can't claim they were akin to "federal officers" in their efforts to comply with consent orders to remediate a Superfu

    1 minute read

  • Martinez v. Ford Motor Company

    Publication Date: 2010-05-28
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-05-27
    Court: C.A. 2nd
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Bisnar & Chase, Brian D. Chase and John V. Bell, for Plaintiffs and Appellants.
    for defendant: Yoka & Smith, Walter M. Yoka, David T. McCann and Elizabeth A. Kurtz, for Defendant and Respondent Cooper Tire & Rubber Company. Snell & Wilmer, Robert J. Gibson, Richard A. Derevan, Brendan M. Ford, Jessica Charles, and Jill P. McDonell, for Defendant and Respondent Ford Motor Company.
    Case Number: No. B214955

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 6695 JOSE MAZON MARTINEZ et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY e

  • Zamora v. Lehman

    Publication Date: 2010-06-29
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-06-29
    Court: C.A. 2nd
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Ford & Serviss, William H. Ford III and Claudia J. Serviss for Plaintiff and Appellant.
    for defendant: Rutter Hobbs & Davidoff, Brian Leslie Davidoff, Christopher C. Fowler; and Frank D. Hobbs for Defendants and Respondents Stephen C. Lehman and Eric R. Weiss. Bird, Marella, Boxer, Wolpert, Nessim, Drooks & Lincenberg, Mark T. Drooks and Bonita D. Moore for Defendant and Respondent Daniel M. Yukelson.
    Case Number: No. B215764

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 8285NANCY HOFFMEIER ZAMORA, as Trustee in Bankruptcy, etc., Plaintiff and Appellant, v.p id="dcasename