• Sabi v. Sterling

    Publication Date: 2010-04-09
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-04-08
    Court: C.A. 2nd
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: McDermott Will & Emery, Brandon J. Roker, Gregory R. Jones; Denise McGranahan; Brancart & Brancart, Christopher Brancart; and Catherine M. Bishop for Plaintiff and Appellant. Farella Braud & Martel, Grace K. Won, Andrew W. Ingersoll, Monica Swanson Hunt; and Linda D. Kilb for Disability Rights Advocates, Disability Rights California, Disability Right Education and Defense Fund, Disability Rights Legal Center, Law Foundation of Silicon Valley, and Legal Aid Society ? Employment Law Center as Amici Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Appellant. Barbara Jones for AARP, Legal Services of Northern California and National Senior Citizens Law Center as Amici Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Appellant. Howrey, Constance F. Ramos and Michael C. Chou for Bet Tzedek Legal Services, Housing Rights Center, Inner City Law Center, Coalition for Economic Survival, Tenants Together, Tenderloain Housing Clinic, the Impact Fund and Public Counsel as Amici Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Appellant.
    for defendant: Klinedinst, G. Dale Britton, Gregory A. Garbacz; and Douglas L. Walton for Defendants and Respondents. Pahl & McCay, Stephen D. Pahl, Karen K. McCay and Servando R. Sandoval for California Apartment Association as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Respondents. Law Offices of Cummings Myer, Thomas B. Cummings and Audrey L. Myer for Apartment Association of Orange County as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Respondents. Trevor A. Grimm and Craig Mordoh for California Apartment Law Information Foundation as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Respondents.

    Case Number: No. B205279

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 4444ELISHEBA SABI, Plaintiff and Appellant,v.DONALD T. STERLING et al., Defendants and Respo

  • US v. Paul Daugerdas, S3 09 Cr. 581 (WHP)

    Publication Date: 2012-06-06
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
    Judge: District Judge William H. Pauley
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant: *1

    Case Number: S3 09 Cr. 581 (WHP)

    Cite as: US v. Paul Daugerdas, S3 09 Cr. 581 (WHP), NYLJ 1202557350938, at *1 (SDNY, Decided June 4, 2012)District Judge William H. Pauleyp class="de

  • November 25, 2009 | The Recorder

    Default Not a Tactical Move, Justices Rule

    SACRAMENTO — Sometimes an attorney's bad advice is just bad advice, not shrewd legal strategizing gone awry. That's what the Sixth District Court of Appeal concluded Tuesday when i

    1 minute read

  • Pettaway v. Brown, 09 Civ. 3587

    Publication Date: 2010-05-10
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-05-03
    Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District
    Judge: James Francis
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 09 Civ. 3587

    Magistrate Judge James C. Francis U.S. DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Shawn Pettaway, Eastern Correctional Facility, Napanoch, New York Kayoni

  • David Graham, Jr v. United States

    Publication Date: 2011-02-15
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-02-10
    Court: D.C. Ct. App.
    Judge: Kramer, Associate Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 06-CF-995

    Argued September 30, 2010Before GLICKMAN, KRAMER,and BLACKBURNE-RIGSBY, Associate Judges,David Graham appeals from his convictions for first-degree murder while armed, possession of a firearm du

  • September 9, 2011 | Law.com Corporate

    $37.4 million in damages ordered against Cartier supplier

    Swiss jewelers Cartier and Van Cleef & Arpels have won a $37.4 million federal court judgment against a New York supplier of knockoff rings, bracelets and other luxury items — thank

    1 minute read

  • August 1, 1999 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Who Was Watching the Watcher?

    Gerald Schrager was upset. It was September 1997 and he had just learned that the financial trustee of an ailing, rich, old, client from Blairstown had purchased a Mercedes-Benz S-320.Why wo

    1 minute read

  • Pulido v. Chrones

    Publication Date: 2010-12-21
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-12-21
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: Before: Alfred T. Goodwin, Diarmuid F. O'Scannlain and Sidney R. Thomas, Circuit Judges.*
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: J. Bradley O?Connell filed the post-Supreme Court remand brief for the petitioner-appellee.
    for defendant: Jeremy Friedlander, Deputy Attorney General, San Francisco, California, filed the post-Supreme Court remand brief for the respondent-appellant. With him on the brief were Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorney General; Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorney General; Gerald A. Engler, Senior Assistant Attorney General; and Peggy S. Ruffra, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, San Francisco, California.

    Case Number: No. 05-15916

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 15714MICHAEL ROBERT PULIDO, Petitioner-Appellee, v. CHRIS CHRONES; A. HEDGPETH, Respondents

  • November 25, 2009 | The Recorder

    Lawyer's Advice Merely Bad, Not a Tactical Move, Calif. Court Finds

    Sometimes an attorney's bad advice is just bad advice, not shrewd legal strategizing gone awry. That's what California's 6th District Court of Appeal concluded Tuesday when it reversed a tri

    1 minute read

  • People v. Tate

    Publication Date: 2010-07-12
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-07-08
    Court: Ca. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Attorneys for Respondent: Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorney General, Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Gerald A. Engler, Assistant Attorney General, Bruce Ortega and Sara Turner, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
    for defendant: Attorneys for Appellant: Michael J. Hersek, State Public Defender, under appointment by the Supreme Court, and Harry Gruber, Deputy State Public Defender, for Defendant and Appellant.

    Case Number: No. S031641

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 8815THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. GREGORY O. TATE, Defendant and Appellan