Filter This View

  • Espinoza v. State

    Publication Date: 2000-06-30
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: McMurray, William Leroy
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A00A1334, A00A1335

    Evidence that the defendants traveled together as passengers in a convoy of vehicles was sufficient for the jury to infer that the defendants had at least joint constructive possession of the 25 po

  • Wheeling-Culligan v. Allen

    Publication Date: 2000-06-16
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Johnson, Edward H.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: David J. Worley Jacobs & Slawsky PA, Atlanta, and Stuart Goldstein, Miami, Fla., for appellant.
    for defendant: . Hunter R. Hughes III and Daniel D. Zegura Rogers & Hardin, Atlanta, for appellee.
    Case Number: A00A0065

    Court order quashing Florida plaintiffs' subpoena to take Georgia witness's deposition is presumed correct because the order was based on the witness's interrogatory responses that were not included

  • Perimeter Realty v. GAPI Inc.

    Publication Date: 2000-06-02
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Phipps, Herbert E.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A99A2282, A99A2283

    Trial court's error in striking plaintiffs' affidavits in opposition to the defendants' summary judgment motion was harmless since the affidavits did not support plaintiffs' RICO c

  • Paul v. Keene

    Publication Date: 2000-05-12
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Thompson, Hugh P.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: J. Wayne Crowley Bush, Crowley, Leverett & Leggett LLP, Macon, for appellant.
    for defendant: . William H. Larson, Thomas P. Allen III Martin, Snow, Grant & Napier LLP and Miguel A. Garcia Jr. Westmoreland, Patterson & Moseley LLP, Macon, for appellees.
    Case Number: S00A0389

    The defendants were entitled to a jury trial in the plaintiffs' quiet title action because their was a genuine dispute as to whether the plaintiffs and the defendants had agreed to partition the dis

  • Heston v. Lilly

    Publication Date: 2000-05-05
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Pope, Marion T.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Van C. Wilks, Carrollton, for appellant.
    for defendant: Stuart Theodore Allen & Assocs., Atlanta, for appellee.
    Case Number: A99A2509

    The trial court erred in denying the plaintiff's motion for a new trial without hearing oral arguments as mandated by Uniform Superior Court Rul

  • Hall v. Coleman

    Publication Date: 2000-04-07
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Pope, Marion T.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Kevin P. Bradley and Philip T. Raymond III Shaffer, Raymond & Dalton, Macon, for appellant.
    for defendant: Verna Smith, Dublin, for appellees.
    Case Number: A99A1787

    The trial court erred in finding that the child of a bigamous marriage was illegitimate since the child was born before the marriage was declared

  • Dyer v. Souther, Ex'r

    Publication Date: 2000-03-31
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Hines, P. Harris
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Frank J. Beltran and Charlotte K. Perrell Beltran & Assocs., Atlanta, for appellant.
    for defendant: . Jack M. Carey Carey, Jarrard & Walker, Gainesville, for appellee.
    Case Number: S99A1294

    Trial court erred in directing a verdict on caveators' claim that will was the product of undue influence by propounder of will since there was sufficient circumstantial evidence to raise a jury que

  • Allen v. State

    Publication Date: 2000-03-24
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Phipps, Herbert E.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: J. Michael Bass Closson, Bass & Tomberlin, Valdosta, for appellant.
    for defendant: J. David Miller, District Attorney, and Jennifer A. Thomas, Assistant District Attorney, Valdosta, for appellee.
    Case Number: A99A1882

    The trial court properly instructed the jury that defendant's mistaken belief that the child molestation victim was over 16 years old was irrelevant and no de

  • Sexton v. Clayton County Tax Digest

    Publication Date: 2000-03-03
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Eldridge, Frank M.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Lee Sexton Lee Sexton & Assocs. PC, Jonesboro, for appellant.
    for defendant: Donald M. Comer II, Jonesboro, Brian R. Dempsey, Jack R. Hancock Hancock & Echols, Thurbert E. Baker, Attorney General, and Laurel E. Henderson, Atlanta, for appellee.
    Case Number: A00A0379

    Trial court set an excessive millage rate for temporary collection of ad valorem taxes pending approval of county's tax digest, since that rate would allow the county to collect funds exceeding its b

  • Kight v. State

    Publication Date: 2000-02-25
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Eldridge, Frank M.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: David H. Jones King & King & Jones PC and William R. Wansker, Atlanta, for appellant.
    for defendant: Paul L. Howard Jr., District Attorney, Bettieanne C. Hart, Assistant District Attorney, and Elizabeth A. Baker, Atlanta, for appellee.
    Case Number: A00A0424

    Parents' testimony that their 11-year-old daughters stated defendant molested them was admissible since there was no evidence that the girls were coached or threatened and the children testified and