• February 13, 2006 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Rivelli v. MH&W Corporation

    N.J. Superior Court, Appellate Divsion WORKERS' COMPENSATION Rivelli v. MH&W Corporation A-1010-04T3; Appellate Division; opinion by Stern, P.J.A.D.;

    1 minute read

  • March 24, 2009 | The Recorder

    Judge Testifies in Case Against Kay

    SAN FRANCISCO — Over an unrelenting barrage of objections, the judge who got Philip Kay in troublewith the State Bar testified Monday that the San Francisco lawyer was out of control sev

    1 minute read

  • Rosenblit v. Zimmerman

    Publication Date: 2001-02-27
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-02-26
    Court: N.J. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: Justice Long
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: A-58/61 SEPTEMBE

    ON APPEAL FROM ON CERTIFICATION TO Appellate Division, Superior CourtChief Justice Poritz PRESIDINGArgued September 25, 2000On certification to the Superior Court, Appellate Division.This

  • December 28, 1999 | The Legal Intelligencer

    Hospital Not Vicariously Liable on Informed Consent Claim

    A hospital cannot be held vicariously liable for the failure of one of its doctors to obtain informed consent, the Superior Court has held. In a case of first impression, the intermediate ap

    1 minute read

  • August 27, 2001 |

    news in brief

    news in brief Med Mal Insurer PHICO Placed in Rehab Harrisburg - The Mechanicsburg-based PHICO insurance company was recently placed in rehabilitation after Pennsylvania Insuranc

    1 minute read

  • Stasz v. Eisenberg

    Publication Date: 2010-12-10
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-12-10
    Court: C.A. 2nd
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Shanel Stasz, in propria persona, for Plaintiff and Appellant.
    for defendant: Weiss & Weissman, Inc. and Alan R. Seher for Defendants and Respondents.

    Case Number: No. B217470

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 15359SHANEL STASZ, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. MICHAEL EISENBERG et al., Defendants and Res

  • In re Lucas

    Publication Date: 2010-03-05
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-03-05
    Court: C.A. 3rd
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Richard A. Ciummo & Associates, Jonathan Richter and Richard H. Kohl for Petitioner.
    for defendant: Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorney General, Michael P. Farrell, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Jeffrey D. Firestone and Jennifer M. Poe, Deputy Attorneys General, for Respondent.

    Case Number: No. C062809

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 2757In re DAVID LUCAS on Habeas Corpus.No. C062809In the Court of Appeal of the State of Ca

  • September 8, 2010 | The Recorder

    HP Faces Uphill Battle to Stop Hurd From Taking Oracle Job

    Hewlett-Packard's legal team will have a hard time persuading a state court judge to stop former

    1 minute read

  • In Re Wage Payment Litigation

    Publication Date: 2000-09-01
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2000-08-29
    Court: Maine Sup. Ct.
    Judge: CLIFFORD, RUDMAN, SAUFLEY, ALEXANDER, and CALKINS, JJ
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Gerald F. Petruccelli
    for defendant: William J. Kayatta et al.

    Case Number: 2000 ME 162

    The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion. CLIFFORD, J.Five classes of employees appeal judgments of dismissal of their complaints against their employers as

  • In re Joshua S.

    Publication Date: 2011-02-08
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-02-08
    Court: C.A. 1st
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Attorneys for Respondent: Edmund G. Brown Jr., Attorney General, Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General, Dane R. Gillette, Chief Asst. Atty. Gen., Gerald A. Engler, Sr. Asst. Atty. Gen., Eric D. Share, Deputy Attorney General, Ronald E. Niver, Deputy Attorney General
    for defendant: Attorney for Appellant: Jeffrey A. Needleman by appointment of the Court of Appeal under the First District Appellate Project?s Assisted Case System

    Case Number: No. A128295

    Cite as 11 C.D.O.S. 1794In re JOSHUA S., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, p clas