Filter This View

  • Fait v. New Faze Development, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2012-06-27
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-06-27
    Court: C.A. 3rd
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Glenn A. Fait and Elizabeth Colegrove, for Plaintiffs and Appellants.
    for defendant: Kilpatrick Law Offices and Terence Kilpatrick; Real Estate Law Group and Jason L. Hoffman, for Defendants and Respondents.
    Case Number: No. C067630

    Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 7320 DONNA FAIT et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. NEW FAZE DEVELOPMENT, INC., et a

  • Kranich v. TCAC LLC

    Publication Date: 2009-03-31
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Superior Court
    Judge: Fischer, J.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: CV06-5000476S

  • People v. Ramirez

    Publication Date: 2013-09-12
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2013-09-11
    Court: C.A. 4th
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General, Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Julie L. Garland, Assistant Attorney General, A Natasha Cortina and Kelley Johnson, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
    for defendant: Laura G. Schaefer, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant Luis Alberto Ramirez Allen G. Weinberg, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant Jose Roberto Armendariz.
    Case Number: No. G044703

    Cite as 13 C.D.O.S. 10209 THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. LUIS ALBERTO RAMIRE

  • January 15, 2010 | The American Lawyer

    Watering Canned: Lewis Brisbois Wins Bar of Sweeping California Water Deal

    As a life-long East Coaster, our introduction to California's long struggle over water rights was informed by Roman Polanski's epic Chinatown, which w

    1 minute read

  • May 5, 2003 | National Law Journal

    The Injudicious

    You'd think they'd learn, what with all the shattered careers and yuckfests with Jay Leno presiding. For Law Day 2003, The National Law Journal offers its list of judges behavin

    1 minute read

  • Azusa Land Partners v. Department of Industrial Relations

    Publication Date: 2010-12-21
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-12-21
    Court: C.A. 2nd
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis, Patrick A. Perry and Nancy�S. Fong for Plaintiff and Appellant. Paskerian Block Martindale & Brinton, Robin C. Martindale and Caleb J. Brinton IV for Rancho Mission Viejo as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Appellant. Cox, Castle & Nicholson, John S. Miller, Jr. and Dwayne P. McKenzie for California Building Industry Association as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Appellant.
    for defendant: Vanessa L. Holton, Anthony Mischel and Christopher Jagard for Defendant and Respondent.
    Case Number: No. B218275

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 15761AZUSA LAND PARTNERS, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, D

  • July 26, 2004 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Ptaszynski v. Uwaneme

    N.J. Superior Court, Appellate Division A-5975-01T3; Appellate Division; opinion by Winkelstein, J.A.D.; decided and approved for publication July 21, 2004. Before Judges Kesti

    1 minute read

  • Braunstein v. Arizona Department of Transportation

    Publication Date: 2012-06-27
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-06-27
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: John W. Sedwick, District Judge, Presiding Before: Procter Hug, Jr., Andrew J. Kleinfeld, and William A. Fletcher, Circuit Judges.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Paul S. Gerding, KUTAK ROCK LLP, Scottsdale, Arizona, and Gary Edward Lofland, LOFLAND & ASSOCIATES, Yakima, Washington, for the appellant.
    for defendant: Melissa Alice Parham, Kelly Y. Schwab, Michelle Hibbert Swann, CURTIS GOODWIN SULLIVAN UDALL & SCHWAB PLC, Phoenix, Arizona, and Kiersten A. Murphy, Kevin E. O?Malley, GALLAGHER & KENNEDY, P.A., Phoenix, Arizona, for the appellees.
    Case Number: No. 10-16564 No. 10-17193

    Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 7285 PAUL BRAUNSTEIN, DBA Baseplans USA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ARIZONA DEPARTMENT O

  • May 17, 2005 | The American Lawyer

    High-Tech, Low-Tech

    The case against American Tobacco Company Inc., was built on hard work and clever legal argument, but, as is so often true, it also was held together with technology that helped the lawyers bo

    1 minute read

  • Brisbon v. United States

    Publication Date: 2008-10-15
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-10-09
    Court: D.C. Ct. App.
    Judge: Ruiz, Associate Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For appellant Ronald Brisbon: Michael Spekter, Washington, D.C. For appellant Michael Wonson: Peter Meyers, George Washington University Law School, Washington, D.C.
    for defendant: For appellee: Chrisellen Kolb, U.S. Attorney's Office, Washington, D.C.
    Case Number: Nos. 02-CF-601, 02-CF-777 & 04-CO-144

    Argued April 18, 2006Before RUIZ, Associate Judge, FARRELL, Associate Judge, Retired,*fn1 and BELSON, Senior Judge.Appellants Ronald Brisbon and Michael Wonson