Filter This View

  • Securities and Exchange Commission v. Raj Rajaratnam, 10-462-cv

    Publication Date: 2010-09-30
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
    Judge: Before: Raggi, Lynch, and Chin, C.JJ
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Kevin P. McGrath, Senior Trial Counsel, Securities and Exchange Commission, New York, New York (Valerie A. Szczepanik, Senior Trial Counsel, Securities and Exchange Commission, New York, New York; David M. Becker, General Counsel, Mark D. Cahn, Deputy General Counsel, Jacob H. Stillman, Solicitor, Mark Pennington, Assistant General Counsel, David Lisitza, Senior Counsel, Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, DC, on the brief), for Plaintiff-Appellee. Reed M. Brodsky, (Andrew L. Fish, on the brief), Assistant United States Attorneys for Preet Bharara, United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, New York, New York, for Amicus Curiae United States of America in support of Plaintiff-Appellee.
    for defendant: Patricia A. Millett, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, Washington, DC (Robert H. Hotz, Jr., Samidh Guha, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, New York, New York; John M. Dowd, Terence J. Lynam, William E. White, Kevin R. Amer, Issaac J. Lidsky, Anne J. Lee, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, Washington, DC, Alan R. Kaufman, James M. Keneally, Thomas B. Kinzler, Kelley Drye & Warren LLP, New York, New York, on the brief), for Defendants-Appellants. Craig Green, Associate Professor, Temple Law School, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Douglas R. Jensen, Park & Jensen LLP, New York, New York, for Amici Curiae John Does Number One, Two and Three. Marc Rotenberg, (John Verdi, Jared Kaprove, on the brief), Electronic Privacy Information Center, Washington, DC, for Amicus Curiae Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) in support of Defendants-Appellants.
    Case Number:

    Cite as: Securities and Exchange Commission v. Raj Rajaratnam, 10-462-cv, NYLJ 1202472687879, at *1 (2d Cir., Decided September 29, 2010)Before: Raggi, Lynch,

  • Securities and Exchange Commission v. Raj Rajaratnam, 10-462-cv

    Publication Date: 2010-09-30
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
    Judge: Before: Raggi, Lynch, and Chin, C.JJ
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Kevin P. McGrath, Senior Trial Counsel, Securities and Exchange Commission, New York, New York (Valerie A. Szczepanik, Senior Trial Counsel, Securities and Exchange Commission, New York, New York; David M. Becker, General Counsel, Mark D. Cahn, Deputy General Counsel, Jacob H. Stillman, Solicitor, Mark Pennington, Assistant General Counsel, David Lisitza, Senior Counsel, Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, DC, on the brief), for Plaintiff-Appellee. Reed M. Brodsky, (Andrew L. Fish, on the brief), Assistant United States Attorneys for Preet Bharara, United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, New York, New York, for Amicus Curiae United States of America in support of Plaintiff-Appellee.
    for defendant: Patricia A. Millett, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, Washington, DC (Robert H. Hotz, Jr., Samidh Guha, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, New York, New York; John M. Dowd, Terence J. Lynam, William E. White, Kevin R. Amer, Issaac J. Lidsky, Anne J. Lee, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, Washington, DC, Alan R. Kaufman, James M. Keneally, Thomas B. Kinzler, Kelley Drye & Warren LLP, New York, New York, on the brief), for Defendants-Appellants. Craig Green, Associate Professor, Temple Law School, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Douglas R. Jensen, Park & Jensen LLP, New York, New York, for Amici Curiae John Does Number One, Two and Three. Marc Rotenberg, (John Verdi, Jared Kaprove, on the brief), Electronic Privacy Information Center, Washington, DC, for Amicus Curiae Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) in support of Defendants-Appellants.
    Case Number:

    Cite as: Securities and Exchange Commission v. Raj Rajaratnam, 10-462-cv, NYLJ 1202472687879, at *1 (2d Cir., Decided September 29, 2010)Before: Raggi, Lynch,

  • People v. Verdugo

    Publication Date: 2010-08-03
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-08-02
    Court: Ca. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: No. S083904

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 9885THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. NATHAN VERDUGO, Defendant and Appellant.p

  • Benay v. Warner Bros. Entertainment, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2010-06-09
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-06-09
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Sylvia Havens, Los Angeles, California, for the appellants.
    for defendant: George R. Hedges, Gary E. Evans, QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP, Los Angeles, California, Jaime Wayne Marquart, Daryl Marc Crone, BAKER MARQUART CRONE & HAWXHURST, LLP, Los Angeles, California, for the appellees.
    Case Number: 08-55719

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 7182AARON BENAY; MATTHEW BENAY, individually, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v.WARNER BROS. ENTERTAI

  • Cooper Technologies Co. v. Dudas

    Publication Date: 2008-08-27
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-08-19
    Court: Fed. Cir.
    Judge: Linn, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For plaintiff-appellant: R. Ted Cruz, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, Houston.
    for defendant: For government defendant-appellee: Nathan Kelley, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Arlington, Va. For defendant-appellee Thomas & Betts Corp.: Alan Fisch, Kaye Scholer, Washington, D.C.
    Case Number: 2008-1130

    Before MICHEL, Chief Judge, LOURIE and LINN, Circuit Judges.In this case, we are called upon to determine which patents are subject to inter partes reexamination. Congress established the inter par

  • Fertile v. St. Michael's Medical Center

    Publication Date: 2001-07-26
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-07-25
    Court: N.J. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: Long, J.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A-49 September T

    Argued April 30, 2001The core issues presented on this appeal are rather straightforward: in the face of a concededly excessive damages award, when is the remedy of a new damages trial conditioned

  • Leachman v. Dretke

    Publication Date: 2008-06-02
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-05-29
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 2
    Judge: Bob Mccoy Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 2-07-221-CV

    OPINIONI. IntroductionAppellant Leachman Matthew James Leachman, an inmate housed in a Texas Department of Criminal Justice ("TDCJ") facility, filed suit against appellees Doug Dretke, Glenda J.

  • United States v. Osama Awadallah

    Publication Date: 2006-03-30
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District
    Judge: Shira Scheindlin
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    U.S. DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Judge Scheindlin I. INTRODUCTION The selection of a jury for the trial of Osama Awadallah has resulted in

  • In the Matter of the Complaint of the City of New York, 03-CV-6049

    Publication Date: 2008-02-21
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-02-14
    Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District
    Judge: Edward Korman
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 03-CV-6049

    District Judge Edward R. Korman U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Judge Korman On the afternoon of October 15, 2003, the Staten Island Ferry A

  • United States v. Delgado

    Publication Date: 2011-02-10
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-01-19
    Court: 5th Cir.
    Judge: James L. Dennis, Circuit Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 07-41041

    United States Court of Appeals Fifth CircuitFILEDLyle W. Cayce ClerkBefore WIENER, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.Defendant-Appellant Maria Aide Delgado was convicted of (1) posses