Filter This View

  • October 3, 2014 | New Jersey Law Journal

    2014 Pro Hac Vice Ineligible List

    SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY Pro Hac Vice Ineligibility Order Pursuant to Rule 1:28-2 Pursuant to Rule 1:28-2, the Trustees of the New Jersey Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection (

    1 minute read

  • September 29, 2014 | Daily Business Review

    Disciplined Without Lying, Cheating, Stealing. Now U.S. Supreme Court May Weigh In

    Tampa criminal defense lawyer Lanell Williams-Yulee didn't lie, cheat or steal, but earlier this year the Florida Supreme Court reprimanded her for conduct unbecoming a judicial cand

    1 minute read

  • September 26, 2014 | New Jersey Law Journal

    2014 Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection PHV & MJP Ineligible Lists

    LAWYERS' FUND FOR CLIENT PROTECTION INELIGIBLE PRO HAC VICE ATTORNEYS AND INELIGIBLE MULTIJURISDICTIONAL PRACTITIONERS Pro hac vice attorneys and multijurisdi

    1 minute read

  • September 24, 2014 | Litigation Daily

    Illinois High Court Takes Up $10 Billion Philip Morris Case

    A decade ago, the Illinois Supreme Court killed off a $10 billion deceptive marketing verdict against Philip Morris USA Inc., only to have a lower court reinstate the verdict this April based

    1 minute read

  • September 24, 2014 | Supreme Court Brief

    The Same-Sex Marriage Petitions

    The cases are listed below, along with counsel of record (*) and additional counsel. ► Herbert v. Kitchen, Tenth Circuit, Utah *Special assistant attorney gen

    1 minute read

  • Gucci America, Inc., Balenciaga America, Inc., Balenciaga, S.A., Bottega Veneta International S.A.R.L., Bottega Veneta, Inc., Luxury Goods International S.A., Yves Saint Laurent America, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellees v. Bank of China, Appellant, Weixing Li, DBA Redtagparty, DBA Myluxurybags.com, DBA Xpressdesginers.com, DBA Xpressdesigner.net, DBA Designer Handbags, aka Xin Li, et al., Defendants, 11-3934-cv

    Publication Date: 2014-09-19
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
    Judge: Before: Livingston, Lynch, and Lohier, C.JJ.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Appellant: Bradley Stephen Pensyl, Pamela Rogers Chepiga, on the brief, Andrew Rhys Davies, Allen & Overy LLP, New York, NY.
    for defendant: For Plaintiffs-Appellees: Howard S. Hogan, Anne M. Coyle, Jennifer C. Halter, on the brief, Robert L. Weigel, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, New York, NY.
    Case Number: 11-3934-cv

    Cite as: Gucci v. Bank of China, 11-3934-cv, NYLJ 1202670687855, at *1 (2d Cir., Decided September 17, 2014) 11-3934-cv Before: Livingston, Lynch,

  • September 15, 2014 | National Law Journal

    Archis Parasharami

    Archis Parasharami, co-chairman of Mayer Brown's class action practice, turned a

    1 minute read

  • In re Credit Default Swaps Antitrust Litigation, 13md2476 (DLC)

    Publication Date: 2014-09-08
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
    Judge: District Judge Denise Cote
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For plaintiffs: Daniel L. Brockett, Steig D. Olson, Justin T. Reinheimer, Nick T. Landsman-Roos, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, New York, NY. Bruce L. Simon, George S. Trevor, Aaron M. Sheanin, Pearson, Simon & Warshaw, LLP, San Francisco, CA.
    for defendant: For defendants Bank of America Corporation and Bank of America N.A.: Robert F. Wise, Jr., Arthur J. Burke, Jeremy T. Adler, Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, New York, NY. For defendant Barclays Bank PLC: Todd S. Fishman, Michael S. Feldberg, M. Elaine Johnston, Allen & Overy LLP, New York, NY. For defendant BNP Paribas: David Esseks, Brian de Haan, Allen & Overy LLP, New York, NY. John Terzaken, Molly Kelley, Allen & Overy LLP, Washington, DC. For defendants Citigroup Inc., Citibank, N.A., and Citigroup Global Markets Inc.: Benjamin R. Nagin, Eamon P. Joyce, Sidley Austin LLP, New York, NY. David F. Graham, David C. Giardina, Jennifer E. Novoselsky, Sidley Austin LLP, Chicago, IL. For defendant Credit Suisse AG: J. Robert Robertson, Benjamin Holt, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Washington, DC. For defendant Deutsche Bank AG: David P. Wales, Jones Day, Washington, DC. Tracy V. Schaffer, Eric P. Stephens, Jones Day, New York, NY. Paula W. Render, Alex P. Middleton, Jones Day, Chicago, IL. For defendant Goldman, Sachs & Co.: Richard C. Pepperman II, Bradley P. Smith, Mark S. Geiger, Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, New York, NY. Robert Y. Sperling, Winston & Strawn LLP, Chicago, IL. Seth Farber, Winston & Strawn LLP, New York, NY. Elizabeth P. Papez, Winston & Strawn LLP, Washington, DC. For defendants HSBC Bank plc and HSBC Bank USA, N.A.: Richard A. Spehr, Michael O. Ware, Mayer Brown LLP, New York, NY. Andrew S. Marovitz, Britt M. Miller, Mayer Brown LLP, Chicago, IL. For defendants JPMorgan Chase & Co. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.: Peter E. Greene, Peter S. Julian, Boris Bershteyn, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, New York, NY. Patrick J. Fitzgerald, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, Chicago, IL. For defendant Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC: Evan R. Chesler, Daniel Slifkin, Michael A. Paskin, Vanessa A. Lavely, Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP, New York, NY. For defendants UBS AG and UBS Securities LLC: David C. Bohan, Katten Muchin Rosenman, LLP, Chicago, IL. James J. Calder, Katten Muchin Rosenman, LLP, New York, NY. For defendants Royal Bank of Scotland PL and Royal Bank of Scotland N.V.: Charles F. Rule, Joseph J. Bial, Amy W. Ray, Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP, Washington, DC. For defendant International Swaps and Derivatives Association: Matthew J. Reilly, Abram J. Ellis, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, Washington, DC. Michael J. Garvey, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, New York, NY. For defendant Markit Group Ltd.: Colin R. Kass, Scott M. Abeles, Proskauer Rose LLP, Washington, D.C. Alan R. Kusinitz, Proskauer Rose LLP, New York, NY. For defendant Markit Group Holdings Limited: Colin R. Kass, Proskauer Rose LLP, Washington, D.C. Alan R. Kusinitz, Proskauer Rose LLP, New York, NY.
    Case Number: 13md2476 (DLC)

    Cite as: Credit Default Swaps, 13md2476 (DLC), NYLJ 1202669251987, at *1 (SDNY, Decided September 4, 2014) 13md2476 (DLC) District Judge Denis

  • September 4, 2014 | Litigation Daily

    Patent Wins Pile Up for Google After Alice v. CLS Bank

    Applying the age-old concepts of searching and ranking to the Internet helped Google Inc. become one of the world's richest companies. But over the past three weeks, Google and its lawye

    1 minute read

  • John Doe I v. Nestle USA, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2014-09-04
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2014-09-04
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: Stephen V. Wilson, District Judge, Presiding Before: Dorothy W. Nelson, Kim McLane Wardlaw, and Johnnie B. Rawlinson, Circuit Judges.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Paul Hoffman (argued), Schonbrun DeSimone Seplow Harris Hoffman & Harrison, LLP, Venice, California; Terrence Patrick Collingsworth, Conrad & Scherer, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Plaintiff-Appellants.
    for defendant: Andrew John Pincus (argued), Mayer Brown LLP, Washington, DC; Craig A. Hoover and Christopher Todd Handman, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Washington, D.C.; Julie A. Shepard, Jenner & Block, LLP, Los Angeles, California; Jonathan H. Blavin and Kristin Linsley Myles, Munger Tolles & Olson, LLP, San Francisco, California; Brad D. Brian and Daniel Paul Collins, Munger Tolles & Olson, LLP, Los Angeles, California; Lee H. Rubin, Mayer Brown LLP, Palo Alto, California, for Defendants-Appellees.
    Case Number: No. 10-56739

    Cite as 14 C.D.O.S. 10396 JOHN DOE I; JOHN DOE II; JOHN DOE III, individually and on behalf of proposed class members; GLOBAL EXCHANGE, Plaintiffs-App