• Rothstein v. UBS AG, 11-0211-cv

    Publication Date: 2013-02-19
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
    Judge: Before: Kearse, Lohier, and Droney, C.JJ.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Plaintiffs-Appellants: Robert J. Tolchin, Jaroslawicz & Jaros, New York, New York, on the brief, Nathaniel A. Tarnor, Washington, D.C.
    for defendant: For Defendant-Appellee: Daniel L. Cantor, Jacqueline V. Roeder, O'Melveny & Myers, New York, New York; Jonathan D. Hacker, Anton Metlitsky, O'Melveny & Myers, Washington, D.C.; Andrew J. Pincus, Marc R. Cohen, Alex C. Lakatos, Paul W. Hughes, Mayer Brown, Washington, D.C., on the brief, Jonathan Rosenberg, New York, New York. Filed a brief for Amicus Curiae Government of Switzerland, In Support of Appellee, Frederick A. Brodie, of Counsel, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, New York, New York. Filed a brief for Amici Curiae Institute of International Bankers, Association of German Banks, economiesuisse, European Banking Federation, Federation of German Industries, French Banking Federation, Mouvement des Entreprises de France, and Swiss Bankers Association, in Support of Appellee, Linda C. Goldstein, of Counsel; Brian D. Ginsberg, Covington & Burling, New York, New York, of Counsel, Dechert, New York, New York.

    Case Number: 11-0211-cv

    Cite as: Rothstein v. UBS AG, 11-0211-cv, NYLJ 1202588420674, at *1 (2d Cir., Decided February 14, 2013)Before: Kearse, Lohier, and Droney, C.JJ.p cl

  • May 4, 2007 | National Law Journal

    FDA's Pre-emption Rule Splits the Courts

    Nearly one year after the U.S. Food and Drug Administration issued a pre-emption on filing failure-to-warn actions over federally approved drugs, rulings across the nation show a clear division

    1 minute read

  • December 20, 2009 | The American Lawyer

    Citations

    She didn't have a damn thing to do with it." — David Oesting of Davis Wright Tremaine in Anchorage, plaintiffs attorney in the ExxonValdez

    1 minute read

  • November 20, 2006 | The Legal Intelligencer

    A Pair of Constitutional Law Issues

    Tonight at 8 on WFMZ-TV 69, Christopher Naughton's Law Journal examines two Constitutional Law issues: "The Military Commissions Act: Suspension of Habeas Corpus?" and "Post-Kelo

    1 minute read

  • September 19, 2012 | New York Law Journal

    Judge Contends Foreseeability Is Crucial Part of Gravity Claims

    Tackling a discussion he called "long overdue," Justice Nelson Roman a target="new" href="http://judges.newyorklawjournal.com/profile/Appellate_Division,_First_Department/Nelson

    1 minute read

  • May 10, 2006 | New York Law Journal

    Class Action Suit Proceeds Against Investment Firm

    A class action suit against the investment management company Campbell Cowperthwait, alleging that the firm breached its fiduciary duty by, among other things, failing to diversify its clients

    1 minute read

  • August 30, 2011 | New York Law Journal

    Objectors to BofA Settlement Remove Case to Federal Court

    Court proceedings over Bank of America's increasingly embattled mortgage-backed securities settlement just got even messier, thanks to David Grais. Just days before today's deadline for inve

    1 minute read

  • February 1, 2013 | The Legal Intelligencer

    Another Look at Pa.'s Judicial Retirement Age Provision

    Editor's note: The author represents several judges in the lawsuit challenging Pennsylvania's mandatory judicial retirement age.In a recent column, "A Look at the Lawsui

    1 minute read

  • April 15, 2010 | The Legal Intelligencer

    High Court Hears Argument on Supermarket Beer Sales

    The sale of beer in supermarkets with cafes was before the state Supreme Court Wednesday, and one of the justices asked whether the move — approved by the Liquor Control Board —

    1 minute read

  • August 9, 2013 | The Legal Intelligencer

    Plaintiffs in Judicial Retirement Suit Cite Windsor

    Mandating that Pennsylvania's judges retire in the year they turn 70 cannot be upheld even under the lowest standard of constitutional review, a group of judicial plaintiffs argued i

    1 minute read