Filter This View

  • Rich v. Rich

    Publication Date: 2005-11-09
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Unknown
    Judge: Mary Smith
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    ROCKLAND COUNTY Supreme Court Justice Smith Upon the foregoing papers, it is Ordered

  • Hammer v. Ashcroft

    Publication Date: 2009-07-02
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-06-25
    Court: 7th Cir.
    Judge: *fn1 Easterbrook, Chief Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 06-1750

    ARGUED SEPTEMBER 10, 2008Before EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge, and BAUER, POSNER, KANNE, ROVNER, WOOD, EVANS, and SYKES, Circuit Judges."[N]ewsmen have no con- stitutional right of access to prisons

  • People v O'Neil

    Publication Date: 2009-10-22
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 3rd Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 102322

    Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Third Judicial Department Decided and Entered: October 22, 2009 102322 THE PEO

  • Smallen v. New York University, 106564/06

    Publication Date: 2009-07-30
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-07-08
    Court: Supreme Court, New York County
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: No CaseNumber

    Justice Carol R. Edmead NEW YORK COUNTY Supreme Court Attorney for Plaintiff: David S. Perry and Brian Heller, Esqs., Schwartz & Perry, LLP Attorney for

  • Arbor Commercial Mortgage LLC v. Martinson, 009255/07

    Publication Date: 2007-11-08
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2007-10-31
    Court: Supreme Court, Nassau County
    Judge: Daniel Palmieri
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 009255/07

    Acting Justice Daniel Palmieri NASSAU COUNTY Supreme Court Thomas Baylis, Esq. Cullen and Dykman, LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff John De

  • State v. Livingston

    Publication Date: 2001-05-03
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-05-01
    Court: N.J. Super. App. Div.
    Judge: Alley, J.A.D.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A-5583-98T4,, A-

    NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISIONA-5583-98T4 Argued and A-5811-98T4 Submitted April 3, 2001These appeals arise from the trial of co-defendants Sylvester Livingst

  • Orellana v. Boro-Wide Recycling Corp., 12489/04

    Publication Date: 2008-01-04
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2007-12-19
    Court: Supreme Court, Kings County
    Judge: Herbert Kramer
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 12489/04

    Justice Herbert Kramer KINGS COUNTY Supreme Court Plaintiffs Segundo and Daisy Orellana were represented by Simonson, Hess & Leibowitz, PC Defendant Boro-

  • Matter of London Terrace Gardens v. City of New York, 109121/10

    Publication Date: 2011-05-12
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court, New York County, Part 10
    Judge: Justice Judith J. Gische
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 109121/10

    Cite as: Matter of London Terrace Gardens v. City of New York, 109121/10, NYLJ 1202493606263, at *1 (Sup., NY, Decided May 5, 2011)Justice Judith J. Gische

  • People v. Minor

    Publication Date: 2010-09-08
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-09-08
    Court: C.A. 3rd
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorney General, Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Michael P. Farrell, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Charles A. French, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, Peter H. Smith, Deputy Attorney General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
    for defendant: Robert D. McGhie for Defendant and Appellant.
    Case Number: No. C057609

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 11789 THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. MICAH BENJAMIN MINOR, Defendant and Appellan

  • October 23, 2006 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Eminent Domain in the New Jersey Courts

    In the wake of the United State Supreme Court's June 2005 Kelo v. New London decision, lawyers, commentators and community activists have regarded the ruling as a threat to private-prop

    1 minute read