Filter This View

  • Wurtzel v. Starbucks Coffee Co.

    Publication Date: 2003-04-23
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    Judge Platt WURTZEL v. STARBUCKS COFFEE CO. — Defendant Starbucks Coffee Company (“Starbucks” or “Defendant”) moves for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56(b)

  • Kings County Second Department SUPREME COURT,

    Publication Date: 2012-03-08
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court:
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    Justice Loren Baily-SchiffmanJp Morgan Chase Bank v. Alexander (11526/11)—Motion DeniedJustice Bernadette BayneZylberb

  • People v. Thomas Morales, 1721/05

    Publication Date: 2006-10-02
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2006-09-22
    Court: Supreme Court, New York County
    Judge: Bonnie Wittner
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 1721/05

    NEW YORK COUNTY Supreme Court Justice Wittner On April 1, 2005, defendant Thomas Morale

  • Commonwealth v. Kutnyak

    Publication Date: 2001-08-14
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-08-13
    Court: Pa. Super. Ct.
    Judge: Hudock, J.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 3137 EDA 2000

    �1 Appellant appeals, pro se, the order entered October 11, 2000, disposing of his first petition brought pursuant to the Post Conviction Relief Act (PCRA), 42 Pa.C.S.A. sections 9541-46. Appellant's

  • November 18, 2009 | The Associated Press

    Controversial court nominee survives Senate test

    WASHINGTON AP - Democrats on Tuesday crushed a Senate filibuster against a controversial appeals court nominee, demonstrating to Republicans they can't stop President Barack Obama from turnin

    1 minute read

  • Janosky v. St. Amand

    Publication Date: 2010-02-08
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-02-03
    Court: 1st Cir.
    Judge: Selya, Circuit Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 09-1012

    Before Lynch, Chief Judge, Selya and Stahl, Circuit Judges.This case arises out of an armed robbery gone awry. In his appeal, petitioner-appellant Sean Janosky, a state prisoner, challenges the dis

  • September 8, 2003 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Bowers v. The National Collegiate Athletic Association et al, etc.,

    This matter comes before this court on appeals by the University of Iowa, Delaware State University, the University of Massachusetts and the University of Memphis in an action Michael Bowers b

    1 minute read

  • March 15, 2005 | The Legal Intelligencer

    Candidates Line Up for First Judicial District Court Seats

    Second of a two-part series. Twenty-six candidates are vying for seven vacant seats on the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas in the May 17 primary election. Last Tuesda

    1 minute read

  • Hartman v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

    Publication Date: 2013-02-19
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2013-02-19
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: Lawrence J. O'Neill, District Judge, Presiding
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: David C. Kiernan (argued), Jones Day, San Francisco, California; Thomas Ritchie, Jones Day, Chicago, Illinois; and Barbara McGraw, Moraga, California, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
    for defendant: Michael D. Gowe (argued), Deputy Attorney General, and Fiel D. Tigno, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, for Defendants-Appellees State Personnel Board, Sean Harrigan, Richard Costigan, Patricia Clarey, Tom Maely, and Anne Sheehan. Kenneth T. Roost (argued), Deputy Attorney General; Jonathan L. Wolff, Senior Assistant Attorney General; and Thomas S. Patterson, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, for Defendants-Appellees California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Division of Community Partnerships, Central California Women's Facility, Matthew Cate, Del Sayles-Owen, Barry Smith, Mary Lattimore, and the State of California.
    Case Number: No. 11-16008

    Cite as 13 C.D.O.S. 1885SHAWNA HARTMANN and CAREN HILL, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

  • United States v. Rocha

    Publication Date: 2010-03-18
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-03-18
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Thomas P. O?Brien, United States Attorney, Sheri Pym, Antoine F. Raphael (argued), Sean K. Lokey, Assistant United States Attorneys, for the plaintiffs-appellees.
    for defendant: Gene D. Vorobyov, Law Office of Gene Vorobyov, California, for the defendants-appellants.
    Case Number: No. 08-50175

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 3374UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v.VICTOR ROCHA, also known as Mono,