Filter This View

  • April 17, 2014 | Daily Report Online

    Justice Stevens in Atlanta: Phone Data Collection Is 'Price We Pay'

    Retired U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice John Paul Stevens on Wednesday spoke to more than 500 lawyers, federal and state judges and law students in Atlanta, focusing on what he said wer

    1 minute read

  • April 16, 2014 | Daily Report Online

    ON THE MOVE: UGA Law Names Director of Career Development

    The University of Georgia School of Law has recruited Alston & Bird partner Susan Wilson to head its career development department at a time when law students seek more job placement ass

    1 minute read

  • Robert Ross, et al., Plaintiffs v. American Express Company, et al., Defendants, 04 Civ. 5723 (WHP)

    Publication Date: 2014-04-14
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
    Judge: District Judge William H. Pauley
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: All Counsel of Record: Merrill G. Davidoff, Esq., David A. Langer, Esq., Charles P. Goodwin, Esq., Berger & Montague, P.C., Philadelphia, PA. Counsel for Plaintiffs: Christopher M. Burke, Esq., Scott + Scott LLP, San Diego, CA.
    for defendant: Counsel for Defendants American Express: Evan Chesler, Esq., Gary Bornstein, Esq., Rowan Wilson, Esq., Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP, New York, NY. Counsel for Defendants Discover: Robert Y. Sperling, Esq., Malcom Cox, Esq., Ronald S. Betman, Esq., Winston & Strawn LLP, Chicago, IL. Counsel for Defendants Citigroup: David Graham, Esq., Theodore R Scarborough, Jr., Esq., Patrick E. Croke, Esq., Sidley Austin LLP, Chicago, IL.
    Case Number: 04 Civ. 5723 (WHP)

    Cite as: Ross v. American Express Co., 04 Civ. 5723 (WHP), NYLJ 1202650972862, at *1 (SDNY, Decided April 10, 2014) 04 Civ. 5723 (WHP)/

  • April 14, 2014 | Texas Lawyer

    Inadmissible: Marshmallow Models

    Former Justices on Oral Argument Judges hear countless oral arguments on the bench. Once they hang up their robes, they may have advice for lawyers. Adele Hedges, for

    1 minute read

  • April 11, 2014 | Texas Lawyer

    Who Knew Marshmallow Bunnies Had So Much to Say?

    Who knew that PEEPS, those confectionery marshmallow birds and bunnies that are so popular at this time of year, could advocate for the rights of same-sex couples? Rhonda Brink certainl

    1 minute read

  • Perkin v. San Diego Gas & Electric Company

    Publication Date: 2014-04-11
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2014-04-11
    Court: C.A. 4th
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Adler Law Group, E. Elliott Adler; The Kane Law Firm, Steven S. Kane, Bonnie E. Kane; Frantz Law Group, James P. Frantz; Niddrie Fish Addams and David A. Niddrie for Plaintiffs and Appellants.
    for defendant: Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, Kenneth R. Chiate, Harry A. Olivar, Jr., Kristen Bird, Jeffrey N. Boozell; Office of the General Counsel and C. Larry Davis for Defendants and Respondents.
    Case Number: No. D062923

    Cite as 14 C.D.O.S. 3928 ROBERT PERKIN et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. SAN DIEGO G

  • April 11, 2014 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Approved Opinions: April 3-9, 2014

    STATE COURT CASES ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT 01-2-3371 Town

    1 minute read

  • Rose v. Tee-Bird Golf Club, 516687

    Publication Date: 2014-04-11
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, Third Department
    Judge: Before: Lahtinen, J.P., Stein, McCarthy and Garry, JJ.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For respondent: Amanda Sherman of counsel, Burke, Scolamiero, Mortati & Hurd, LLP, Albany.
    for defendant: For appellant: Maureen G. Fatcheric of counsel, Costello, Cooney & Fearon, PLLC, Camillus.
    Case Number: 516687

    Cite as: Rose v. Tee-Bird Golf Club, 516687, NYLJ 1202650747994, at *1 (App. Div., 3rd, Decided April 10, 2014) 516687 Before: Lahtinen, J.P., Ste

  • April 11, 2014 | New York Law Journal

    Panel Allows Lawsuit Over Golf Cart Accident

    A golfer who was injured when his cart flipped over while he drove down a slippery slope may sue course operators, an upstate appeals court decided Thursday. A unanimous Appellate Div

    1 minute read

  • Larry Rose v Tee-Bird Golf Club, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2014-04-10
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION THIRD DEPARTMENT
    Judge: J.P., Stein, McCarthy and Garry, JJ.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 516687

    Costello, Cooney & Fearon, PLLC, Camillus (Maureen G. Fatcheric of counsel), for appellant.Burke, Scolamiero, Mortati & Hurd, LLP, Albany (Amanda Sherman of counsel), for respo