• August 29, 2005 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Foreign Business May Be Taxed in N.J., Court Holds

    Out-of-state corporations that have no New Jersey physical presence but draw revenue from affiliates located here are subject to the state's Corporate Business Tax, the Appellate Division held

    1 minute read

  • December 21, 2004 | The Legal Intelligencer

    Business Was the Business of the Bar in 2004

    For the Philadelphia Bar Association in 2004, the business of law was the business of bar leaders, as Chancellor Gabriel L.I. Bevilacqua renewed the campaign for a permanent commerce court and

    1 minute read

  • June 25, 2002 | The Legal Intelligencer

    Speech Limits in Judicial Races May Ease

    The U.S. Supreme Court is poised to decide whether to strike down stringent restrictions on what candidates for judicial office may say during campaigns. Tomorrow, the high court is scheduled to is

    1 minute read

  • August 30, 2005 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Foreign Business Must Pay Business Taxes, Says N.J. Appellate Court

    Out-of-state corporations that have no New Jersey physical presence but draw revenue from affiliates located there are subject to the state's Corporate Business Tax, the Appellate Division hel

    1 minute read

  • July 30, 2010 | Daily Business Review

    Judge OKs law requiring pornographers to keep age records

    A federal judge has refused to strike down recent amendments to the federal Child Protection and Obscenity Enforcement Act that require photographers and filmmakers -- both professional and amateur

    1 minute read

  • NML Capital, Ltd. v. The Republic of Argentina, 12-105(L)

    Publication Date: 2013-08-27
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
    Judge: Before: Pooler, B.D. Parker, and Raggi, C.JJ.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Plaintiff-Appellee: NML Capital, Ltd., Matthew D. McGill, Jason J. Mendro, on the brief, Theodore B. Olson, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Washington, D.C.; Robert A. Cohen, Eric C. Kirsch, Dechert LLP, New York, N.Y. For Plaintiff-Appellee: Olifant Fund, Ltd., Leonard F. Lesser, Simon Lesser, P.C., New York, N.Y. For Plaintiffs-Appellees: Pablo Alberto Varela, et al., Michael C. Spencer, Milberg LLP, New York, N.Y. For Plaintiffs-Appellees: Aurelius Capital Master, Ltd., ACP Master, Ltd., Blue Angel Capital I LLC, and Aurelius Opportunities Master Fund II, LLC., Edward A. Friedman, Daniel B. Rapport, Friedman Kaplan Seiler & Adelman LLP, New York, N.Y. Roy T. Englert, Jr., Mark T. Stancil, Robbins, Russell, Englert, Orseck, Untereiner & Sauber LLP, Washington, D.C.
    for defendant: For Defendant-Appellant: The Republic of Argentina., Carmine D. Boccuzzi, Ezequiel Sanchez-Herrera, Sara A. Sanchez, Michael M. Brennan, on the brief, Jonathan I. Blackman, Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP, New York, N.Y. For Non-Party Appellant: The Bank of New York Mellon, as Indenture Trustee., Colin E. Wrabley, on the brief, James C. Martin, Reed Smith LLP, Pittsburg, Penn.; Eric A Schaffer, Reed Smith LLP, New York, N.Y. For Non-Party Appellants: The Exchange Bondholder Group., David A. Barrett, Nicholas A. Gravante, Jr., Steven I. Froot, on the brief, David Boies, Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP, New York, N.Y. Sean F. O'Shea, Michael E. Petrella, Daniel M. Hibshoosh, O'Shea Partners LLP, New York, N.Y. For Non-Party Appellant: Fintech Advisory Inc., William F. Dahill, Wollmuth Maher & Deutsch LLP, New York, N.Y. For Intervenors: Euro Bondholders., Christopher J. Clark, Craig A. Batchelor, Michael E. Bern, Latham & Watkins, LLP, New York, N.Y. For Intervenor: ICE Canyon LLC., Bruce Bennett, James O. Johnston, Beong-Soo Kim, Jones Day, Los Angeles, Cal. Meir Feder, Jones Day, New York, N.Y. For Amicus Curiae EM Ltd., in support of Plaintiffs-Appellees: David W. Rivkin, Suzanne M. Grosso, Debevoise & Plimpton LLP, New York, N.Y. Amicus Curiae pro se, in support of Plaintiffs-Appellees: Ronald Mann, Esq., New York, N.Y. For Amici Curiae Montreux Partners, L.P. and Wilton Capital, in support of Plaintiffs-Appellees: Jack L. Goldsmith III, Cambridge, Mass.; Judd B. Grossman, Grossman LLP, New York, N.Y. For Amicus Curiae the Washington Legal Foundation, in support of Plaintiffs-Appellees: Richard A. Samp, Cory L. Andrews, Washington Legal Foundation, Washington, D.C. For Amicus Curiae Prof. Kenneth W. Dam, in support of Plaintiffs-Appellees: Kevin S. Reed, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, New York, N.Y. For Duane Morris Individual Plaintiffs — Appellees: Anthony J. Costantini, Rudolph J. Di Massa, Jr., Suzan Jo, Mary C. Pennisi, Duane Morris LLP, New York, N.Y. For Amicus Curiae The Clearing House Association L.L.C., in support of Defendant — Appellant: Paul Saltzman, Joseph R. Alexander, The Clearing House Association L.L.C., New York, N.Y.; H. Rodgin Cohen, Michael M. Wiseman, Sergio J. Galvis, Joseph E. Neuhaus, Michael J. Ushkow, Jared P. Roscoe, Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, New York, N.Y. For Amicus Curiae Alfonso Prat-Gay, in support of Defendant-Appellant: Eugenio A. Bruno, Estudio Garrido, Buenos Aires, Argentina; M. Darren Traub, Akerman Senterfitt, LLP, New York, N.Y. For Amicus Curiae Prof. Anne Krueger, in support of Defendant-Appellant: Edward Scarvalone, Doar Rieck Kaley & Mack, New York, N.Y. For Amicus Curiae Euroclear Bank SA/NV, in support of Defendant-Appellant: Paul T. Shoemaker, Greenfield Stein & Senior LLP, New York, N.Y. For Amicus Curiae Puente Hnos. Sociedad de Bolsa S.A., in support of Defendant-Appellant: Marco E. Schnabl, Timothy G. Nelson, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, New York, N.Y. For Amicus Curiae the American Bankers Association, in support of Non-Party Appellant The Bank of New York Mellon., Matthew D. Ingber, Chrisopher J. Houpt, Mayer Brown LLP, New York, N.Y.; Charles A. Rothfeld, Paul W. Hughes, Mayer Brown LLP, Washington, D.C.

    Case Number: 12-105(L)

    Cite as: NML Capital, Ltd. v. The Republic of Argentina, 12-105(L), NYLJ 1202616997114, at *1 (2d Cir., Decided August 23, 2013) 12-105(L) Before:

  • July 1, 2003 | The Recorder

    Court Says Intel Can't Stop E-mail With Trespass Law

    Companies besieged by unwanted e-mail can only invoke the state's trespass-to-chattels law if the messages cause actual damage to equipment or property, the California Supreme Court ruled Mond

    1 minute read

  • August 18, 2003 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Two Setbacks For Lawsuit Financing

    The business of litigation finance is battered but upright after taking a beating in two courtrooms in the past year. The business of litigation finance is battered but upright after t

    1 minute read

  • July 2, 2003 | The Legal Intelligencer

    Intel Can't Stop E-Mail With Trespass Law

    Companies besieged by unwanted e-mail can only invoke the state's trespass-to-chattels law if the messages cause actual damage to equipment or property, the California Supreme Court ruled Mond

    1 minute read

  • August 29, 2013 | The Legal Intelligencer

    State Opposes Same-Sex Couples' Bid to Join Montco Case

    The Corbett administration has responded to the August 19 petition filed by more than two-dozen same-sex couples seeking to intervene in the state's suit against the Montgomery Count

    1 minute read