Filter This View

  • Weaver v. State

    Publication Date: 2001-08-20
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-08-13
    Court: Del. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: Per Curiam
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 136, 2000

    Submitted: June 20, 2001Upon appeal from the Superior Court. AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.The issue in this case is whether the defendant has a right to appeal his sentences

  • Leland v. Brandal

    Publication Date: 2008-06-16
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-06-13
    Court: Tx. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: Scott Brister Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 06-1028

    Argued November 14, 2007JUSTICE O'NEILL delivered the opinion of the Court, in which CHIEF JUSTICE JEFFERSON, JUSTICE HECHT, JUSTICE WAINWRIGHT, JUSTICE MEDINA, JUSTICE GREEN, JUSTICE JOHNSON, and

  • State v. Whaley

    Publication Date: 2001-06-13
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-06-12
    Court: N.J. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: Justice LaVecchia
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A-101 September

    ON CERTIFICATION TO Appellate Division, Superior CourtChief Justice Poritz PRESIDINGArgued January 2, 2001LaVECCHIA, J.This case involves a defendant who was tried and convicted in absenti

  • December 14, 2006 | New York Law Journal

    Last Grubman Lawsuit Nears Trial

    More than five years after Manhattan publicist Elizabeth Grubman backed her father's black Mercedes SUV into a crowd outside a Hamptons nightclub, the final legal action against her continues

    1 minute read

  • City of San Antonio v. Kopplow Development, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2010-11-03
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-11-03
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 4
    Judge: Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 04-09-00403-CV

    OPINIONSitting: Karen Angelini, Justice, Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice, Rebecca Simmons, Justice.AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED AND RENDERED IN PARTIn this statutory condemnation case, the City

  • Matter of Omnicom Group Inc

    Publication Date: 2007-09-25
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 1st Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: Index 602383/02

    Friedman, J.P., Marlow, Sweeny, Catterson, Malone, JJ. 391 Index 602383/02 In re Omnicom Group Inc. Shareholder Derivative Litigation - - - - - Gary Otterbac

  • City of Balch Springs, Texas v. Austin

    Publication Date: 2010-06-11
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-06-10
    Court: Tx. App. Dist. 5
    Judge: Robert M. Fillmore Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 05-09-00984-CV

    REVERSE and RENDEROPINIONBefore Justices Bridges, Francis and Fillmore.Appellee Diana Hall Austin, Individually, and as Administratrix of the Estate of Jimmy Wayne Hall, Deceased, sued appell

  • Fashakin v. Nextel Communications, 05-CV-3080

    Publication Date: 2009-04-06
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-03-25
    Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District
    Judge: Roslynn Mauskopf
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 05-CV-3080

    District Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Judge Mauskopf MEMORANDUM & ORDER Plaintiff Janet Fashak

  • Ramirez v Miller

    Publication Date: 2006-05-02
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 1st Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    By Andrias, J.P., Sullivan, Williams, Gonzalez, Catterson, JJ. 8171. Jose Ramirez plf-res, v. Mark Miller def, Napco Security Group and Alarm Lock Systems, I

  • Commonwealth v. Hodges

    Publication Date: 2002-01-04
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2002-01-03
    Court: Pa. Super. Ct.
    Judge: Beck, J.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 3030 EDA 2000

    � 1 This is an appeal from the judgment of sentence imposed after appellant entered his guilty plea. Appellant, Tiarike Hodges, presents the following issue for our review: whether a manifest injustic