• September 1, 2004 | The American Lawyer

    Defending Detainees

    In its trio of June decisions on "enemy combatants," the U.S. Supreme Court permitted prisoners on the U.S. military base at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, to get a foot in the door of U.S

    1 minute read

  • September 30, 2013 | National Law Journal

    'Dream Team' Says Case Could End Gay Marriage Controversy

    A lawsuit challenging Virginia's gay marriage and civil union bans may provide the vehicle for a final U.S. Supreme Court ruling on the constitutionality of same-sex marriage—a

    1 minute read

  • August 2, 2006 | Special To Law.Com

    Supreme Court Eases Standard for Title VII Retaliation Claims

    In Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. White, 548 U.S. --, No. 05-259 (June 22, 2006), the U.S. Supreme Court held that the anti-retaliation provision of Title VII of the Civil

    1 minute read

  • September 25, 2007 | National Law Journal

    High Court Is Set for High Drama

    Challenges to the power of the president, Congress and the judiciary, from Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to state death rows, will provide early drama and potential landmark rulings in the new term of the

    1 minute read

  • May 15, 2007 | Special To Law.Com

    'Philip Morris' Decision May Be Hazardous to Jurors' Comprehension

    How can a jury increase a punitive damages award for a defendant's "reprehensible" conduct that harmed nonparties to the litigation without crossing the line into punishing the defendant for that c

    1 minute read

  • June 29, 2005 | Legal Times

    Court Watchers Assess Term's Impact on Rehnquist Legacy

    Solicitor General Paul Clement says he's noticed a new trend in the wardrobe of Supreme Court advocates. More and more men who argue before the Court are wearing bow ties, a tribute to the tra

    1 minute read

  • March 1, 2011 | The American Lawyer

    Marriage Brokers

    No lawsuit in recent history has been the source of more partisan rancor than Bush v. Gore. It divided everyone, it seems, except the two attorneys who argued opposi

    1 minute read

  • September 23, 2013 | National Law Journal

    They're Still Arguing Over ACA

    The U.S. Supreme Court's 2012 decision upholding the Affordable Care Act has legs. Even though the court found the law constitutional, challengers said during a recent discussion of

    1 minute read

  • October 22, 2007 | Legal Times

    Study Suggests Veteran Advocates Sway Supreme Court

    For the elite of the Supreme Court Bar, this is the Gilded Age. Or call it the Age of the Guild.The Court's docket continues to shrink. Yet a href="http://p ssrn.com/sol3/p

    1 minute read

  • Fox Broadcasting Company, Inc. v. Dish Network L.L.C.

    Publication Date: 2013-07-24
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2013-07-24
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: Dolly M. Gee, District Judge, Presiding Before: Sidney R. Thomas, Barry G. Silverman, and Raymond C. Fisher, Circuit Judges.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Paul M. Smith (argued), Jenner & Block LLP, New York, New York; Richard L. Stone, Andrew J. Thomas, David R. Singer, and Amy M. Gallegos, Jenner & Block LLP, Los Angeles, California, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
    for defendant: E. Joshua Rosenkranz (argued), Peter A. Bicks, Elyse D. Echtman, and Lisa T. Simpson, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, New York, New York; Annette L. Hurst and William A. Molinski, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, San Francisco, California; Mark A. Lemley and Michael H. Page, Durie Tangri LLP, San Francisco, California, for Defendants-Appellees. Robert A. Long, Jennifer A. Johnson, and David M. Zionts, Covington & Burling LLP, Washington, D.C., for Amici Curiae ABC Television Affiliates Association et al. Jeffrey A. Lamken and Robert K. Kry, MoloLamken LLP, Washington, D.C., for Amicus Curiae Cablevision Systems Corp.

    Case Number: No. 12-57048

    Cite as 13 C.D.O.S. 7776 FOX BROADCASTING COMPANY, INC.; TWENTIETH CENTURY FOX FILM CORPORATION; FOX TELEVISION HOLDINGS, INC., Plaintiffs-Appell