• January 7, 2009 | New York Law Journal

    Continental Casualty Co., plaintiffs-appellants-respondents v. Employers Insurance Company of Wausau, defendants-respondents-appellants

    Decided Dec. 30, 2008 Before Tom, J.P., Friedman, Nardelli, Catterson, JJ Cross appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Richard F. Braun, J.), ent

    1 minute read

  • North American Van Lines, Inc. v. Emmons

    Publication Date: 2001-07-03
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-06-28
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 9
    Judge: David B. Gaultney Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 09-00-073 CV

    OPINIONFollowing a jury trial, the trial court entered a total judgment for plaintiffs of $19,858,638.08, including actual and punitive damages. No defendant challenges the amount of actual damages

  • United States v. Jones

    Publication Date: 2011-12-19
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-12-15
    Court: 5th Cir.
    Judge: Edward C. Prado, Circuit Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 10-60944, c/ w 11-60159

    United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit Before SMITH, PRADO, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. This appeal arises out of the nearly month-long trial of Telandra Jones, Theddis Pearson, and five

  • Dorman v. 19-20 Industry City Associates Inc.

    Publication Date: 2004-07-28
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court, Kings County
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number:

    Supreme Court IA Part 37 Justice Ruditzky Defendant S&E Building Supplies, Inc. ("S&E") moves for an order, pursuant to CPLR 3212, granting it summary judgment

  • Purtell v. Brucemason

    Publication Date: 2008-05-16
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-05-14
    Court: 7th Cir.
    Judge: Sykes, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 06-3176

    ARGUED APRIL 4, 2007Before KANNE, WILLIAMS, and SYKES, Circuit Judges.This free-speech lawsuit requires us to determine the present scope of the "fighting-words" doctrine. The setting is a neigh

  • People v. Santana

    Publication Date: 2013-06-10
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2013-06-10
    Court: Ca. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Edmund G. Brown, Jr., and Kamala D. Harris, Attorneys General, Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Gary W. Schons and Julie L. Garland, Assistant Attorneys General, Steven T. Oetting, Andrew S. Mestman, Gil Gonzalez and Stacy Tyler, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
    for defendant: Carl Fabian, under appointment by the Supreme Court, for Defendant and Appellant.

    Case Number: No. S198324

    Cite as 13 C.D.O.S. 5845THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. SERAFIN SANTANA, Defenda

  • July 21, 2006 | The Recorder

    Lawyer Discipline

    Suspension For Not Passing PreThe following persons have been suspended by the State Bar Court for not passing the professional responsibility exam effective on the dates indica

    1 minute read

  • September 26, 2005 | The Legal Intelligencer

    Superior Court Affirms $20 Mil. Verdict in Med Mal Case

    A Superior Court panel has upheld the $20 million in compensatory damages a Philadelphia jury awarded in October 2003 to a former Penn student whose family claimed he suffered brain damage aft

    1 minute read

  • Matter of Fernandez v. Board of Trustees, NY Fire Dept. Pension Fund, 26232/08

    Publication Date: 2009-05-12
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-04-15
    Court: Supreme Court, Kings County
    Judge: Lawrence Knipel
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: NY Fire Dept. Pension Fund,26232/08

    Justice Lawrence J. Knipel KINGS COUNTY Supreme Court Plaintiff's Attorney Magda M. Deconinck, Esq. Defendant's Attorney Jeremy Hunt

  • September 24, 2003 | New York Law Journal

    Newsbriefs

    State's Highest Court Will Not Hear Fare Increase ChallengeThe Court of Appeals yesterday declined to review lower court rulings that upheld the controversial fare and toll incr

    1 minute read