Filter This View

  • December 17, 2013 |

    Am. Nat. Prop. & Cas. Co. v. Wyatt

    Click Here for FC&S Legal Expert Analysis Am. Nat. Prop. & Cas. Co.v.Wyatt400 S.W.3d 417Missouri Court of Appeals,Western District.AMERICAN…

    1 minute read

  • December 17, 2013 | The Legal Intelligencer

    When Regulation Ends an American Industry

    Reuters reported in 2012 that the United States' last remaining primary lead smelter will close its doors at the end of 2013. The smelter is located in Missouri, and ompany cited as

    1 minute read

  • Lyman v. NYS OASAS, 1:12-CV-530

    Publication Date: 2013-12-13
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Northern District
    Judge: District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Plaintiff, pro se: Mark Edward Lyman, Albany, NY.
    for defendant: Attorneys for Defendants: Charles J. Quackenbush, AAG., Of Counsel, Office of the New York State Attorney General, Albany, NY.
    Case Number: 1:12-CV-530 (MAD/RFT)

    Cite as: Lyman v. NYS OASAS, 1:12-CV-530 (MAD/RFT), NYLJ 1202632164392, at *1 (NDNY, Decided December 10, 2013) 1:12-CV-530 (MAD/RFT) District Jud

  • Cartledge v. Montano

    Publication Date: 2013-12-10
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Dillard, Stephen Louis A.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: James Howard and Sharon Howard The Howard Law Firm, Tucker, for appellant.
    for defendant: Andrew Holliday and Susan Mulherin Fulcher, Hagler, Reed, Hanks & Harper, Augusta, for appellees.
    Case Number: A13A1580

    The trial court erred in granting the defendant doctor's motion in limine to exclude the plaintiff's expert witness's testimony on the ground that he was not qualified, since this finding was based

  • Petroliam Nasional Berhad v. Godaddy.com, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2013-12-04
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2013-12-04
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: Phyllis J. Hamilton, District Judge, Presiding Before: Dorothy W. Nelson, Milan D. Smith, Jr., and Sandra S. Ikuta, Circuit Judges.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Perry Reed Clark (argued), Palo Alto, California, for Plaintiff-counter-claim-defendant–Appellant.
    for defendant: John Lawrence Slafsky (argued), David L. Lansky, and Evan M.W. Stern, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, Palo Alto, California, for Defendant-counter-claimant–Appellee. Ian Charles Ballon and Lori Chang, Greenberg Traurig, LLP, Los Angeles, California, for Amicus Curiae eNom, Inc. Aaron M. McKown and Paula L. Zecchini, Wrenn Bender LLP, Irvine, California, for Amici Curiae Network Solutions, LLC and Register.com, Inc.
    Case Number: No. 12-15584

    Cite as 13 C.D.O.S. 13044 PETROLIAM NASIONAL BERHAD, (Petronas), Plaintiff-counter-claim-defendant-Appellant,

  • November 29, 2013 | Litigation Daily

    Q&A: James Beck on Why Halliburton Bodes Well for Drug and Device Defendants

    In a recent post in his Drug and Device Law blog, James Beck alerted readers to pay close attention

    1 minute read

  • Smith v. Oregon Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision

    Publication Date: 2013-11-26
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2013-11-26
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: Michael W. Mosman, District Judge, Presiding Before: Alex Kozinski, Chief Judge, and Marsha S. Berzon and Andrew D. Hurwitz, Circuit Judges.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Anthony D. Bornstein (argued), Assistant Federal Public Defender, Portland, Oregon, for Petitioner-Appellant.
    for defendant: Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Anna M. Joyce, Solicitor General, and Inge D. Wells (argued), Senior Assistant Attorney General, Salem, Oregon, for Respondent-Appellee.
    Case Number: No. 11-35338

    Cite as 13 C.D.O.S. 12762 MICHAEL SMITH, Petitioner-Appellant, v. OREGON BOARD OF PAROLE

  • November 26, 2013 |

    McDonnell v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

    Click Here for FC&S Legal Expert Analysis  McDonnellv.State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.299 P.3d 715Supreme Court of Alaska.Lori McDONNELL, individually,…

    1 minute read

  • November 26, 2013 | The Recorder

    Smith v. Oregon Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision

    9th Cir. 11-35338 The court of appeals vacated a district court order dismissing a s petition and remanded the action for further proceedings. The court held that a federal

    1 minute read

  • Kanciper v. Lato, 13-CV-00871

    Publication Date: 2013-11-25
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Eastern District
    Judge: District Judge Arthur Spatt
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Attorneys for the Plaintiff by: Alan E. Sash, Esq., Steven J. Hyman, Esq, of Counsel, McLaughlin & Stern, LLP, New York, NY.
    for defendant: Attorneys for the Defendants by: Brian C. Mitchell, Assistant County Attorney, Suffolk County Attorney's Office, Hauppauge, NY. Attorneys for the Defendant Leonard Lato by: Joseph R. Conway, Esq, of Counsel, LaRusso & Conway, Attorneys at Law, Mineola, NY. Attorney for the Defendant Thomas J. Spota, III by: Garrett W. Swenson, Jr., Esq., of Counsel, Garrett W. Swenson, Jr., Esq., Brookhaven, NY.
    Case Number: 13-CV-00871

    Cite as: Kanciper v. Lato, 13-CV-00871, NYLJ 1202629074525, at *1 (EDNY, Decided November 7, 2013) 13-CV-00871 District Judge Arthur Spattp c