Filter This View

  • Brown v. Superior Court (Morgan Tire & Auto, LLC)

    Publication Date: 2013-06-05
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2013-06-04
    Court: C.A. 6th
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Counsel for Petitioners: Milton Brown and Lee Moncada: Initiative Legal Group - Melissa Grant, Glenn A. Danas, Katherine W. Kehr
    for defendant: Counsel for Real Parties in Interest: Morgan Tire & Auto: Klatte, Budensiek & Young-Agriesti - E.W. Klatte, III, Summer Young Agriesti; Heikaus Weaver - Christopher Michael HeikausWeaver Counsel for Respondent: Superior Court of Santa Clara County: No appearance for respondent
    Case Number: No. H037271

    Cite as 13 C.D.O.S. 5725MILTON BROWN et al., Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SANTA

  • July 22, 2002 | The Legal Intelligencer

    New Trial Gained for Louisiana Death-Row Inmate

    Three years after securing a stay of execution by uncovering evidence of prosecutorial misconduct, two Philadelphia-based Morgan Lewis & Bockius partners have persuaded a Louisiana appeals cour

    1 minute read

  • January 27, 2003 | Legal Times

    Courtside

    A FIRST MONDAY FIRSTThe first Monday in October this fall will be an unusual one. The Supreme Court will commence its fall term that day, Oct. 6, as dictated by law and traditio

    1 minute read

  • December 22, 2003 | The Legal Intelligencer

    Supreme Court Opens Door To Regulation of Lawyer-Lobbyists

    The state Supreme Court has altered the Rules of Professional Conduct to allow lawyers acting as lobbyists to comply with legislative requirements that they disclose information rela

    1 minute read

  • June 16, 2003 | Legal Times

    Supreme Court Term Nears Endgame

    As the Supreme Court headed into the final weeks of its term, the justices handed down a series of opinions June 9 on Agent Orange, employment discrimination, and the composition of appe

    1 minute read

  • May 2, 2011 | National Law Journal

    Brief of the Week: Another cross to bear

    In its fractured "cross in the desert" opinion one year ago in Salazar v. Buono, the Supreme Court said in passing that the First Amendment does not require eradication of

    1 minute read

  • December 22, 2010 | The Legal Intelligencer

    Pa. Law Firms Saw Year of Mergers, Relative Calm

    For the most part, large Pennsylvania law firms kept their proverbial heads down as they tried to plow through what they hoped would be a stabilizing, if not improving, 2010. The constant ne

    1 minute read

  • December 29, 2003 | The Legal Intelligencer

    Supreme Court Opens Door To Regulation of Lawyer-Lobbyists

    The state Supreme Court has altered the Rules of Professional Conduct to allow lawyers acting as lobbyists to comply with legislative requirements that they disclose information rela

    1 minute read

  • February 14, 2011 | The Legal Intelligencer

    U.S. Supreme Court Drives Patent Law Reform

    When it comes to patent reform, the U.S. Supreme Court is a surer bet than Congress — at least in producing results. Consider this: Last week the Senate Judiciary Committee reporte

    1 minute read

  • United States v. Leal-Felix

    Publication Date: 2010-11-01
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-11-01
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Bryan F. Boutwell, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Riverside, California, for the plaintiff-appellee.
    for defendant: Michael Tanaka, Deputy Federal Public Defender, Los Angeles, California, for the defendant-appellant.
    Case Number: No. 09-50426

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 13830UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ISRAEL LEAL-FELIX, Defendant-Appellan