• October 1, 2004 | Corporate Counsel

    DEALS AND SUITS

    Wachovia SouthTrust Like kudzu and Nascar, bank mergers are thriving in the South. On June 21 Charlotte-based Wachovia Corporation announced that it would spend $14.3 bi

    1 minute read

  • Landmark Screens, LLC v. Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP

    Publication Date: 2010-03-30
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-03-29
    Court: C.A. 6th
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Attorneys for Appellant: Sanford Jay Rosen, Sarah Zimmerman, Lisa Ells and Michael W. Bien and Rosen, Bien & Galvan Clark S. Stone, Steven M. Levitan, Jason M. Gonder and Haynes and Boone
    for defendant: Attorneys for Respondents: Elliot R. Peters, Wendy J. Thurm, Steven A. Hirsch and Keker & Van Nest

    Case Number: No. H033285

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 3967LANDMARK SCREENS, LLC, Plaintiff and Appellant, v.MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS, LL

  • Riley v. Taylor

    Publication Date: 2002-01-02
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-12-28
    Court: 3rd Cir.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 98-9009

    Argued November 29, 1999Argued En Banc May 23, 2001OPINION OF THE COURTSLOVITER, Circuit Judge, with whom Judges Mansmann, Nygaard, Roth, McKee and Ambro join, with whom Judges Scirica and Fu

  • March 8, 2013 | New Jersey Law Journal

    New Partners Yearbook 2013

    The past year saw a continued resurgence in new partners at New Jersey firms, which, if not quite as robust as the year before, still held its own as an indicator that the firms are sanguine

    1 minute read

  • June 2, 2008 | The American Lawyer

    Did Affirmative Action Really Hinder Clarence Thomas?

    Why couldn't Clarence Thomas get a job with a big-city law firm when he graduated from Yale in 1974? It's not an idle question. That "time of dashed hopes and expectations," as Thomas onc

    1 minute read

  • September 29, 2010 | National Law Journal

    Courtside: Who's arguing at the Supreme Court in the next argument cycle?

    With no new solicitor general appointed to replace Elena Kagan, the office will be deploying three of its lawyers who are in "acting' positions during the first two argument days of the fa

    1 minute read

  • James Messner and Sandra Messner, Plaintiffs v. Medtronic, Inc., Dr. Kourosh Asgarian, The Heart Institute and Staten Island University Hospital, Defendants, 101698/12

    Publication Date: 2013-04-24
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court, Richmond County, DCM Part 3
    Judge: Justice Joseph Maltese
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Plaintiff are represented By: Nicholas Martino, Esq.
    for defendant: Defendant Medtronic, Inc., is represented By: Mark Shanker, Esq., and John Lavelle, Esq., of the law firm of Morgan Lewis & Bockius, LLP. Defendant Dr. Kourosh Asgarian is represented By: Alexis Vigilante, Esq., of Vaslas, Lepowsky, Hauss & Danke, LLP. Defendant: represented By: Robert Cecala, Esq., of Aaronson, Rappaport, Feinstein & Deutsch, LLP., The Heart Institute and Staten Island University Hospital.

    Case Number: 101698/12

    Cite as: Messner v. Medtronic, 101698/12, NYLJ 1202597025521, at *1 (Sup., RI, Decided 9, 2013)Justice Joseph MalteseDecided:

  • January 1, 2007 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Topical Index to Articles

    please replace asterisks with bullets (option + 8) ABORTION * Justices Eye Alternatives to Partial Birth Abortion; by Tony Mauro, Nov. 13, p. 627. ADVERTISING

    1 minute read

  • July 24, 2006 | New Jersey Law Journal

    40 Under 40

    The biographies that follow are of 40 New Jersey lawyers, all born after Aug. 1, 1966, whom we see as having acquitted themselves well in their brief legal careers. And we do mean bri

    1 minute read

  • Ford Motor Co. v. Texas Dept. of Transportation

    Publication Date: 2001-08-29
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-08-27
    Court: 5th Cir.
    Judge: Benavides, Circuit Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 00-50750

    Appeal from the United States District Court or the Western District of TexasThis case involves Ford Motor Company's ("Ford") attempt to market preowned vehicles in Texas via their internet site kn