• Frank Bellezza, Plaintiff v. D. Holland; L. Clark; R.J. Cunningham; B. Fischer, Defendants, 09 Civ. 8434

    Publication Date: 2011-07-25
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
    Judge: District Judge Robert W. Sweet
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Pro Se: Frank Bellezza, 97A4585 Orleans Correctional Facility, Albion, NY.
    for defendant: Attorney for Defendants: By: Kevin R. Harkins, Esq., Assistant Attorney General, Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General of the State of N.Y., New York, NY.

    Case Number: 09 Civ. 8434

    Cite as: Bellezza v. Holland, 09 Civ. 8434, NYLJ 1202504738317, at *1 (SDNY, Decided July 11, 2011)District Judge Robert W. SweetDe

  • March 13, 2009 | Daily Report Online

    Chief judge reflects on career

    U.S. District Court Chief Judge Julie E. Carnes recently tried an experiment. She came down from the bench and, in her judicial robes, sat down at the defense table next to a defenda

    1 minute read

  • June 1, 2006 | Corporate Counsel

    Your Papers, Please

    One of the most important cases facing general counsel, their accountants, and outside lawyers has been percolating through Texas. The suit raises questions about the scope of the so-called au

    1 minute read

  • February 9, 2010 | New York Law Journal

    Economic Harm Suits Over Toyota Recalls Face 'Rough Time' in Court, Experts Say

    A contingent of small firms with expertise in class actions and products liability litigation are behind a legal onslaught against Toyota Motor Sales USA Inc. following reports of sudden accelerati

    1 minute read

  • July 3, 2006 | Corporate Counsel

    Battle Over Auditor Privilege Raises GCs' Ire

    One of the most important cases facing general counsel, their accountants and outside lawyers has been percolating through Texas. The suit raises questions about the scope of the so-called aud

    1 minute read

  • June 6, 2006 | Corporate Counsel

    Texas Case Raises Galvanizing Issue for GCs: Auditor Privilege

    One of the most important cases facing general counsel, their accountants and outside lawyers has been percolating through Texas. The suit raises questions about the scope of the so-called auditor

    1 minute read

  • October 31, 2007 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Attorneys Reinstated to Practice From 2007 Ineligible List

    The New Jersey Lawyers' Fund For Client Protection declares that the following New Jersey attorneys, having fully satisfied the requirements of R.1:28-2 and R.l:20-1, are eligible to practice

    1 minute read

  • April 24, 2000 | The Legal Intelligencer

    Pa. Bar Institute Takes on Pa. Bar Association Over Costs

    In a move that has bar members buzzing, the Pennsylvania Bar Institute, the organization responsible for providing CLE classes to more than half Pennsylvania's lawyers, filed suit against the Penns

    1 minute read

  • Young v. Conway, 11-830-pr

    Publication Date: 2013-04-26
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
    Judge: Casejudge_
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Petitioner-Appellee: John H. Blume, Cornell Death Penalty Project, Cornell Law School, Ithaca, New York; Brian Shiffrin, Easton Thompson Kasperek Shiffrin, LLP, Rochester, New York.
    for defendant: For Respondent-Appellant: For: Sandra Doorley, District Attorney of Monroe County, Rochester, New York., Geoffrey Kaeuper, Assistant District Attorney. For the Innocence Project as Amicus Curiae: James L. Brochin, Jennifer H. Wu, Cassius K. Sims, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, New York, New York; Barry C. Scheck, David Loftis, Karen Newirth, Innocence Project, Inc., New York, New York.

    Case Number: 11-830-pr

    Cite as: Young v. Conway, 11-830-pr, NYLJ 1202597500937, at *1 (2d Cir., Decided April 23, 2013)Casejudge_Decided: April 23, 2

  • Leyte-Vidal v. Semel

    Publication Date: 2013-10-24
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2013-10-23
    Court: C.A. 6th
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Attorneys for Plaintiff and Appellant: Chapin Fitzgerald Sullivan & Bottini and Francis A. Bottini, Jr. and Keith M. Cochran; Bottini & Bottini and Francis A. Bottini, Jr.
    for defendant: Attorneys for Defendants and Respondents: Morrison & Foerster and Jordan Eth, Anna Erickson White and Mark R.S. Foster

    Case Number: No. H037762

    Cite as 13 C.D.O.S. 11733 MIGUEL A. LEYTE-VIDAL, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. TERRY S.