Filter This View

  • February 6, 2006 | The Legal Intelligencer

    Discovery Rule Discarded When Contract Spells Out Limitation

    The Superior Court ruled that the discovery rule doesn't apply to a latent-defects construction case because a contract provision common in architects' agreements specified a date for commenc

    1 minute read

  • May 21, 2008 | Legal Times

    States breathe easier after court OKs bond exemption

    The U.S. Supreme Court rescued the municipal bond market from major disruption Monday by upholding the power of states to give preferential tax treatment to residents who hold bonds from thei

    1 minute read

  • November 5, 2008 | National Law Journal

    Malfunctioning machines, ballot glitches, election-law litigation — and a busy day for lawyers

    Lawyers who volunteered to take calls and monitor polling locations nationwide on Tuesday reported voting machine malfunctions, polling places opening late and numerous incidences of n

    1 minute read

  • July 17, 2007 | New York Law Journal

    Newsbriefs

    Bill Limiting Law Guardian Caseloads Passes Senate The state Senate gave final passage yesterday to a bill designed to set limits on the number of children law guardians can rep

    1 minute read

  • March 13, 2007 | New York Law Journal

    Smalley, plaintiffs-appellants v. The Dreyfus Corporation, defendants-respondents

    Decided March 8, 2007Before Saxe, J.P.; Marlow, Nardelli, Catterson and McGuire, JJ.Plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Richard B. Lowe III, J.),

    1 minute read

  • Miller v. Arnold Worldwide LLC, 603947/05

    Publication Date: 2006-09-07
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2006-08-28
    Court: Supreme Court, New York County
    Judge: Herman Cahn
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 603947/05

    NEW YORK COUNTY Supreme Court For plaintiff: Julie Hyman, Esq., Law Offices of Julie Hyman For defendant: Jeffrey M. Tamarin, Esq., Reed Smith LLP Justice C

  • Native Village of Kivalina v. ExxonMobil Corporation

    Publication Date: 2012-09-21
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-09-21
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: Native Village of Kivalina v. ExxonMobil Corporation
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Matthew F. Pawa (argued), Law Offices of Matthew. F. Pawa PC, Newton Centre, Massachusetts; Brent Newell, Center on Race, Poverty and the Environment, San Francisco, California; Steve W. Berman, Babara Mahoney, Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, Seattle, Washington; Reed R. Kathrein, Hagans Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, Berkeley, California; Gary E. Mason, Khushi Desai, The Mason Law Firm, Washington, D.C.; Heather Kendall-Miller, Native American Rights Fund, Anchorage, Alaska; Dennis Reich, Reich & Binstock, Houston, Texas; Christopher A. Seeger, Stephen A. Weiss, James A. O'Brien, Seeger Weiss LLP, New York, New York; Stephen D. Susman, H. Lee Godfrey, Eric J. Mayer, Susman Godfrey LLP, Houston, Texas; Terrell W. Oxford, Susman Godfrey LLP, Dallas, Texas; Marc M. Seltzer, Susman Godfrey, LLP, Los Angeles, California; Drew D. Hansen, Susman Godfrey LLP, Seattle, Washington, for the appellants-plaintiffs.
    for defendant:
    Case Number: No. 09-17490

    Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 10915NATIVE VILLAGE OF KIVALINA; CITY OF KIVALINA, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.EXXONMOBIL

  • Milo A. Rose v. Walter A. Mcneil

    Publication Date: 2011-03-10
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-03-04
    Court: 11th Cir.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 10-11848

    [PUBLISH]U.S. COURT OF APPEALS JOHN LEY CLERKMarch 4, 2011Before CARNES, HULL and MARTIN, Circuit Judges. HULL, Circuit Judge:Milo A. Rose, a Florida prison inmate under a death sentence,

  • November 28, 2005 | New Jersey Law Journal

    IOLTA Ineligible List

    The Supreme Court has entered an Order declaring attorneys who have not complied with the mandatory IOLTA program to be administratively ineligible to practice law. The Court's Order and the l

    1 minute read

  • U-Haul International, Inc. v. Waldrip

    Publication Date: 2010-09-03
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-08-31
    Court: Tx. App. Dist. 5
    Judge: Molly Francis Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 05-08-01172-CV

    REVERSE and RENDER in part, AFFIRM in partOPINIONBefore Justices Morris, FitzGerald, and FrancisTalmadge Waldrip suffered catastrophic injuries when a rented U-Haul truck he was exiting began