Filter This View

  • Queens County Second Department SUPREME COURT — Published in the Law Journal on: November 8, 2011,

    Publication Date: 2011-11-04
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court:
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    Justice Augustus C. AgateOtsuka v. Flying Food Group (21007/09)—Sj Liability GrantedJustice Pam B. Jackman BrownAlaimo

  • Nassau County Second Department SUPREME COURT,

    Publication Date: 2012-06-29
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court:
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    Justice Thomas A. AdamsDoe v. McCormack (17871/10)—Motion DecidedDoe v. McCormack (17871/10)—Motion Grantedh2 su

  • Queens County Second Department SUPREME COURT,

    Publication Date: 2012-09-19
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court:
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    Justice Augustus C. AgateCastillo v. Kown (13346/10)& otion WithdrawnRochester v. Stop & Shop Supermarket (700931/12)&

  • Suffolk County Second Department SUPREME COURT,

    Publication Date: 2012-04-17
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court:
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    Justice W. Gerard AsherFederico v. Brancato (12/3133)—Referred To Another JudgeCarrizal v. Leave To Change Name (12/11662)—Case Dis

  • Kings County Second Department SUPREME COURT,

    Publication Date: 2012-03-07
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court:
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    Justice Jack A. BattagliaAustin v. Milan (1484/10)—Joint TrialMims v. Marcelja (13956/10)—Granted Short Form

  • January 15, 2002 | The Legal Intelligencer

    3rd Circuit Overturns $68 Mil Award In an Antitrust Case Against 3M

    Overturning a $68 million verdict, a divided federal appeals court ruled yesterday that office supply giant 3M did not violate antitrust laws in its competitive efforts in the market for trans

    1 minute read

  • January 14, 2002 | The Legal Intelligencer

    3rd Circuit Overturns Mil Award In an Antitrust Case Against 3M

    Overturning a $68 million verdict, a divided federal appeals court ruled Monday that office supply giant 3M did not violate antitrust laws in its competitive efforts in the market for transparent t

    1 minute read

  • Winchester Mystery House, LLC v. Global Asylum, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2012-10-25
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-10-24
    Court: C.A. 6th
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Attorneys for Plaintiff and Appellant: Hopkins & Carley, Eugene Ashley, Allonn E. Levy, Loeb & Loeb LLP, Saul D. Brenner, Melanie Howard
    for defendant: Attorney for Defendant and Respondent: Scott A. Meehan
    Case Number: No. H036253

    Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 12116WINCHESTER MYSTERY HOUSE, LLC, Plaintiff and Appellant,v.GLOBAL ASYLUM, INC., Def

  • People v Tankleff

    Publication Date: 2007-12-18
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 2nd Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 2006-03617

    Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P. GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN ANITA R. FLORIO MARK C

  • In re Miranda

    Publication Date: 2008-05-05
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-05-05
    Court: Ca. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: S058528

    Cite as 08 C.D.O.S. 5360In re ADAM MIRANDA on Habeas Corpus.Nos. S058528 & S060781In the Supreme Court of CaliforniaLos Angeles County Superior Ct.Nos.