Filter This View

  • People v. Streeter

    Publication Date: 2012-06-07
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-06-07
    Court: Ca. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Edmund G. Brown, Jr., and Kamala G. Harris, Attorney General, Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Gary S. Schons, Assistant Attorney General, Annie Featherman Fraser and Melissa Mandel, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
    for defendant: Michael J. Hersek, State Public Defender, under appointment by the Supreme Court, and Andrew S. Love, Deputy State Public Defender, for Defendant and Appellant.
    Case Number: No. S078027

    Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 6226 THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. HOWARD LARCELL STREETER, Defendant and A

  • June 27, 2005 | Texas Lawyer

    Firm$ of Fortune: The 25 Highest-Grossing Texas Firms

    Gross revenue at large Texas firms continues its steady year-to-year rise, with the 25 highest-grossing Texas firms posting an overall 2.3 percent increase in total revenue in 2004, compared t

    1 minute read

  • Youlu Zheng and Donald J. Hillenmeyer on Behalf of Themselves and all others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs v. Carl C. Icahn, Defendants, 650499/10

    Publication Date: 2013-02-21
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court, New York County, Commercial Division
    Judge: Justice Charles E. Ramos
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Attorney For Plaintiff zheng/Class: Judith L. Spanier, Esq., Abbey Spanier Rodd & Abrams, LLP. Attorney For Plaintiff R2: Jeff Ross, Esq., — Ross & Orenstein LLC.
    for defendant: Attorney For All Defendants Except: Dell, Gradin and Knauss, Robert R. Viducich, Esq. Chris Gadoury, Esq. — Berg & Androphy
    Case Number: 650499/10

    Cite as: Zheng v. Icahn, 650499/10, NYLJ 1202588704738, at *1 (Sup., NY, Decided y 29, 2013)Justice Charles E. RamosDecided:

  • Moody's Corporation Securities Litigation, 07 Civ. 8375

    Publication Date: 2013-08-29
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
    Judge: District Judge George B. Daniels
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 07 Civ. 8375

    Cite as: Moody's Corporation Securities Litigation, 07 Civ. 8375, NYLJ 1202617373645, at *1 (SDNY, Decided August 22, 2013) 07 Civ. 8375 D

  • City of Westland Police and Fire Retirement System v. Metlife, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2013-05-13
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
    Judge: District Judge Lewis A. Kaplan
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 12 Civ. 0256 (LAK)

    Cite as: City of Westland Police and Fire Retirement System v. Metlife, Inc., 12 Civ. 0256 (LAK), NYLJ 1202599876636, at *1 (SDNY, Decided February 28, 2013)12 Civ. 0256 (LAK)

  • People v Diaz

    Publication Date: 2009-03-17
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 2nd Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 2005-01744

    Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department PETER B. SKELOS, J.P. STEVEN W. FISHER THOMAS A. DICKERSON ARIEL E.

  • April 23, 2008 | New York Law Journal

    Ruling Leaves School Phone Ban in Force

    An appellate court ruled yesterday that it lacked the authority to overturn an administrative policy prohibiting students from bringing cell phones into New York City public schools - a policy

    1 minute read

  • February 8, 2010 | National Law Journal

    Plaintiffs Firms Mount Mass Attack on Toyota

    A contingent of small firms with expertise in class actions and products liability litigation are behind a legal onslaught

    1 minute read

  • August 4, 2003 |

    Borcky v. Liberty Travel$270,000 VerdictDate of Verdict:July 23, 2003.Court and Case Number:C.P. Delaware, No. 9

    1 minute read

  • Benson v. Patterson

    Publication Date: 2001-08-14
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-08-13
    Court: Pa. Super. Ct.
    Judge: Ford Elliott, J.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 1001 Middle Dist

    � 1 This is an appeal from an order of the orphan's court of Dauphin County dismissing appellants' complaints for support. For the following reasons, we affirm.� 2 The facts of the case are not in