Filter This View

  • Trimarco v. Data Treasury Corp., 30324-2003

    Publication Date: 2013-11-05
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court, Suffolk County, Part 46
    Judge: Justice Emily Pines
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Attorney for Plaintiff/Counterclaim — Defendant: Robert J. Del Col, Esq., Smithtown, NY.
    for defendant: Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaim — Plaintiff: Mckenna Long & Aldridge LLP, Richard B. Friedman, Esq., Alan F. Kaufman, Esq., New York, NY. Herrick, Feinstein LLP, Scott E. Mollen, Esq., Christopher P. Greeley, Esq., New York, NY. Bracken Margolin Besunder LLP, John Bracken, Esq., Linda Margolin, Esq., Islandia, NY.
    Case Number: 30324-2003

    Cite as: Trimarco v. Data Treasury Corp., 30324-2003, NYLJ 1202626313379, at *1 (Sup. SUF, Decided October 30, 2013) 30324-2003 Justice Emily

  • IN RE CHRISTIE'S, INC., pet-res, v. WILLIAM I. KOCH, res-res

    Publication Date: 2013-11-04
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT
    Judge: Mazzarelli, J.P., Renwick, DeGrasse, Feinman, Gische, JJ.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 10941N

    10941N. IN RE CHRISTIE'S, INC., pet-res, v. WILLIAM I. KOCH, res-res — Morvillo Abramowitz Grand Iason & Anello P.C., New York (Edward M. Spiro of counsel), for ap — Skadden,

  • City of Atlanta v. Hotels.com

    Publication Date: 2011-05-27
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Benham, Robert
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Wade H. Tomlinson III Pope, McGlamry, Kilpatrick, Morrison & Norwood, Columbus, Michael L. McGlamry, William U. Norwood III, Neal K. Pope, R. Timothy Morrison, Charles N. Pope Pope, McGlamry, Kilpatrick, Morrison & Norwood, Robert M. Travis, Michael P. Carey and John R. Bielema Jr. Bryan Cave Powell Goldstein LLP, Atlanta, for city of Atlanta. Emmett J. Bondurant, Frank M. Lowrey IV Bondurant, Mixon & Elmore LLP, Robin A. Schmahl, Edward K. Smith Jones Day, Brett A. Rogers, Richard H. Sinkfield Rogers & HardinLLP, Atlanta, Mark J. Altschul, Jeffrey Rossman, Elizabeth B. Herrington McDermott, Will & Emery LLP, Chicago, Ill., Brian S. Stagner, Marcus G. Mungioli, Chad Arnette Kelly, Hart & Hallman LLP, Fort Worth, Texas, Deborah S. Sloan, James P. Karen Jones Day, Dallas, Texas, and Karen L. Valihura Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, Wilmington, Del., for Hotels.com. Amicus: David G. Archer Archer & Lovell PC, Cartersville, Robert M. Brinson, Samuel L. Lucas, J. Anderson Davis, Norman S. Fletcher Brinson, Askew, Berry, Seigler, Richardson & Davis LLP, Rome, John W. Crongeyer Crongeyer Law Firm PC, Davis W. Davenport, Robert C. Lamar, Keith A. Pittman Lamar, Archer & Cofrin LLP, Kenneth N. Winkler Elarbee, Thompson, Sapp & Wilson LLP, Matthew J. Simmons Nelson, Mullins, Riley & Scarborough LLP, and Kevin A. Ross, Atlanta, and Walter J. Gordon Sr. The Gordon Law Firm, Hartwell.
    for defendant:
    Case Number: S11A0508; S11X0509; S11A0510; S11X0512

    The amount that is taxable pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 48-13-50 et seq.-pertaining to city of Atlanta hotel occupancy taxes-is the retail room rate an online travel company charges its consumers, and not

  • City of Atlanta v. Hotels.com LLP

    Publication Date: 2009-04-24
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Hunstein, Carol W.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Charles N. Pope, R. Timothy Morrison, Wade H. Tomlinson III, Neal K. Pope, William U. Norwood III, Michael L. McGlamry Pope, McGlamry, Kilpatrick & Morrison, Robert M. Travis, John R. Bielema Jr. and L. Lin Wood Jr. Bryan, Cave, Powell Goldstein LLP, Atlanta, for appellant.
    for defendant: Emmett J. Bondurant Bondurant, Mixson & Elmore LLP, Edward K. Smith, Robin A. Schmahl Jones Day, Atlanta, Carol L. Morris, Alpharetta, James P. Karen, Deborah S. Sloan Jones Day, Dallas, Texas, David F. McDoweel Morrison & Foerster, Darrel J. Hieber Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, Los Angeles, Calif., Karen L. Valihura Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, Willington, DE, Elizabeth B. Herrington McDermott, Will & Emery LLP and David J. Stagman Katten, Muchin & Rosenman LLP, Chicago, Ill., for appellee. Amicus appellant: Robert C. Lamar, David W. Davenport Lamar, Archer & Cofrin LLP, John W. Crongeyer Vroon & Crongeyer LLP, Susan J. Moore, Ted C. Baggett Georgia Municipal Ass'n, Kevin A. Ross, James F. Grubiak, Michele L. NeSmith, Atlanta, Walter J. Gordon Sr. The Gordon Law Firm, Hartwell, David C. Archer Archer & Lovell PC, Cartersville, Robert M. Brinson, Norman S. Fletcher, J. Anderson Davis, Samuel L. Lucas and Ansel F. Beacham III Brinson, Askew, Berry, Seigler & Richardson, Rome. Amicus appellee: Charles S. Johnson III and Raymond P. Carpenter Holland & Knight LLP, Atlanta.
    Case Number: S08G0568

    The city should not be required to submit to the administrative process set forth in the enabling statutes and hotel t inance, until the threshold legal issue of the applicability of the hotel

  • McKesson Corp. v. Green

    Publication Date: 2005-03-17
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Thompson, Hugh P.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Joseph R. Manning and John H. Williamson Morris, Manning & Martin LLP, Atlanta, for appellant.
    for defendant: . H. Lamar Mixon, Jill A. Pryor, Jason M. Freier Bondurant, Mixon & Elmore LLP, John G. Parker Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker and Dorothy Y. Kirkley Kirkley & Payne LLP, Atlanta, for appellees. Amicus Appellant: Myer Eisenberg, Deputy General Counsel, and Edward C. Schweitzer U. S. Securities Exchange Comm., Washington, D.C.
    Case Number: S04G1228, S04G1229

    The appellant's confidentiality agreement with the SEC did not insure that certain audit documents would remain confidential, since the agreement allowed the SEC to give the documents to others if i

  • CanWest Global Communications Corp. v, Mirkaei Tikshoret Limited

    Publication Date: 2005-03-14
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court, New York County
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    NEW YORK COUNTY Supreme Court Justice Edmead CanWest Global Communications Corp. ("CanWest") petitions the Court, by Order to Show Cause ("Motion Sequence 001"), for

  • New York Rowing Association, v. The Peter Jay Sharp Boathouse,

    Publication Date: 2012-02-23
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT
    Judge: Tom, J.P., Friedman, Sweeny, Moskowitz, DeGrasse, JJ.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 652243/11

    Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, New York (Gary J. Hacker of counsel), for appellants.Proskauer Rose LLP, New York (Brian D. Burton of counsel), for respondent. Ord

  • Liszeida Perez, etc., v. KeySpan Corporation

    Publication Date: 2012-04-12
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT
    Judge: Gonzalez, P.J., Saxe, Moskowitz, Acosta, Freedman, JJ.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 302208/10

    Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, LLP, New York (John H. Lyons of the bar of the District of Columbia, admitted pro hac vice, of counsel), for KeySpan Corporation, appellant.Bi

  • In Re Harbin Shareholders Litigation, 35327-10

    Publication Date: 2011-08-26
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court, Suffolk County, Trial Term, Part 44
    Judge: Justice Elizabeth H. Emerson
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Liaison Counsel for Plaintiffs Norfolk County Retirement System, Yun and Gould and Class Liaison Counsel, Jaspan Schlesinger LLP, Garden City New York. Counsel for Plaintiff Norfolk County Retirement System and Co-Lead Counsel for the Class, Labaton Sucharow LLP, New York, NY. Counsel for Plaintiff Yun and Co-Lead Counsel for the Class, Wolf Popper LLP New York, NY. Counsel for Plaintiff Gould and Co-Lead Counsel for the Class, Brower Piven, New York, NY.
    for defendant: Attorneys for Defendant: Harbin Electric, Inc., Loeb & Loeb LLP., New York. NY. Attorneys for Defendant: Harbin Electric, Inc., Moritt, Hock, Hamroff & Horowitz, LLP., Garden City, New York. Attorneys for Defendant: Tianfu Yang Four Times Square, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP., New York, NY.
    Case Number: 35327-10

    Cite as: In re Harbin Shareholders Litigation, 35327-10, NYLJ 1202512441097, at *1 (Sup., SUF, Decided August 19, 2011)Justice Elizabeth H. Emersonp

  • Devore v. Pfizer Inc., 109838/06

    Publication Date: 2007-03-26
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2007-03-14
    Court: Supreme Court, New York County
    Judge: Martin Shulman
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 109838/06

    Justice Martin Shulman NEW YORK COUNTY Supreme Court For Plaintiff: Mark J. Krum, Esq. For Defendant: Skadden Arps, et al. Mark Cheffo, Esq.