Filter This View

  • August 26, 2008 | National Law Journal

    What's Your Juror Taking?

    As the percentage of Americans taking various medications skyrockets, some jury consultants and lawyers have begun asking potential jurors what kinds of medications they are taking. They'

    1 minute read

  • February 27, 2006 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Digests of Unpublished Decisions

    1. McNeally v. Perez, A-3832-02T2 DDS No. 23-2-8829 Judges Wefing, Fall and Payne Jan. 3, 2005 Result: Summary judgment in favor of defendant is affirmed. Fac

    1 minute read

  • Jacobs v. Clark County School District

    Publication Date: 2008-05-12
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-05-12
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Allen Lichtenstein, General Counsel, ACLU of Nevada, Las Vegas, Nevada, for the plaintiffs-appellants.
    for defendant: C.W. Hoffman, Jr., Clark County School District, Office of the General Counsel, Las Vegas, Nevada, for the defendants-appellees.
    Case Number: 05-16434

    Cite as 08 C.D.O.S. 5617KIMBERLY JACOBS; DONALD JACOBS; LINDA ROWLEY; DWIGHT TERRY, JR.; DWIGHT TERRY, SR.; SHANE DRESSER; DONALD DRESSER; WENDY DRESSER; LONA FINLEY; WHITNEY ROSE; LYNN ROSE

  • AUBLE, WILLIAM v DOYLE, PATRIC

    Publication Date: 2007-03-16
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 4th Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 273

    SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 273 CA 06-00578 PRESENT: HURLBUTT, J.P., MARTOCHE,

  • QUAIL SUMMIT, INC., v TOWN OF CANANDAIGUA

    Publication Date: 2005-06-10
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 4th Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 625

    SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 625 CA 05-00166 PRESENT: PIGOTT, JR., P.J., HURLBUT

  • People v. Steven Somerville

    Publication Date: 2004-02-23
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court, Kings County
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    Supreme Court Criminal Term, Part DV Justice Leventhal This matter is before the court for resentencing after the United States District Court for the Eastern District

  • P., LISA v ATTICA CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT

    Publication Date: 2006-03-17
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 4th Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 130

    SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 130 CA 05-01637 PRESENT: KEHOE, J.P., MARTOCHE, SMI

  • June 20, 2011 | National Law Journal

    INADMISSIBLE

    KATYAL MAY HAVE PICK OF APPELLATE JOBS Neal Katyal's job search is underway, and former acting Solicitor General Walter Dellinger said "the demand fo

    1 minute read

  • HERRGESELL, ELEANOR G. v THE GENESEE HOSPITAL

    Publication Date: 2007-11-23
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 4th Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 1351

    SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 1351 CA 06-03340 PRESENT: GORSKI, J.P., MARTOCHE, S

  • McCaskey v. California State Automobile Association

    Publication Date: 2010-11-01
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-10-29
    Court: C.A. 6th
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Appellants Francis A. McCaskey et al.: Law Offices of Daniel U. Smith: Daniel U. Smith, Ted W. Pelletier; Law Office of Patrick K. Tillman: Patrick K. Tillman
    for defendant: Attorneys for Defendants and Respondents California State Automobile Association et al: Reed Smith: Paul D. Fogel, Raymond Cardozo; Littler Mendelson: John C. Fish, Jr., Laura E. Hayward
    Case Number: No. H032186 No. H032186

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 13869FRANCIS A. McCASKEY, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CALIFORNIA STATE AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATI