Filter This View

  • McCaskey v. California State Automobile Association

    Publication Date: 2010-11-01
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-10-29
    Court: C.A. 6th
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Appellants Francis A. McCaskey et al.: Law Offices of Daniel U. Smith: Daniel U. Smith, Ted W. Pelletier; Law Office of Patrick K. Tillman: Patrick K. Tillman
    for defendant: Attorneys for Defendants and Respondents California State Automobile Association et al: Reed Smith: Paul D. Fogel, Raymond Cardozo; Littler Mendelson: John C. Fish, Jr., Laura E. Hayward
    Case Number: No. H032186 No. H032186

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 13869FRANCIS A. McCASKEY, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CALIFORNIA STATE AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATI

  • February 23, 2007 | New York Law Journal

    Newsbriefs

    Two Brooklyn Attorneys Charged in Mortgage Scheme Queens District Attorney Richard A. Brown has filed criminal charges against two lawyers who participated in a scheme to sell a

    1 minute read

  • Kings County Second Department SUPREME COURT,

    Publication Date: 2012-10-05
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court:
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    Justice Rachel Amy AdamsJohnson v. Johnson (53103/12)—Motion GrantedSmyth v. Smyth (52264/08)—Pd - Motion Gran

  • July 7, 2008 |

    McClain Appoints 70 to Leadership Postions

    More than 70 Pennsylvania lawyers will serve as 2008-09 chairs of Pennsylvania Bar Association's committees and sections. PBA President C. Dale McClain made the following appointments: Al

    1 minute read

  • August 19, 2004 | The Legal Intelligencer

    People In The News

    New Office Mintzer Sarowitz Zeris Ledva & Meyers has announced the opening of a new office in Hicksville, N.Y. The new location opened this summer with an initial com

    1 minute read

  • The People v. Oscar Chavez, 4185/2010

    Publication Date: 2012-08-08
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court, New York County, Part 96
    Judge: Judge Jill Konviser
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: The People were represented by Assistant District Attorney Ehren Reynolds.
    for defendant: The Defendant was represented by Alfredo M. Hernandez, Esq.
    Case Number: 4185/2010

    Cite as: The People v. Oscar Chavez, 4185/2010, NYLJ 1202566622095, at *1 (Sup., NY, Decided July 2, 2012) Judge Jill Konviser

  • August 6, 2003 | The Legal Intelligencer

    Attorneys Impressed With Commerce Court

    The Commerce Court Management Program, now out of its infancy and fully into the toddler stage, could be setting Philadelphia up to be the country's next commercial litigation center, accordin

    1 minute read

  • Towery v. Shriro

    Publication Date: 2010-12-21
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-09-22
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: Mary H. Murguia, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted February 4, 2010—Pasadena, California Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Raymond C. Fisher and N. Randy Smith, Circuit Judges.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Daniel D. Maynard, Maynard, Cronin, Erickson, Curran & Sparks, PLC, Phoenix, Arizona, for the petitioner-appellant.
    for defendant: Terry Goddard, Attorney General, Kent E. Cattani, Chief Counsel, and Jon G. Anderson (argued), Assistant Attorney General, Phoenix, Arizona, for the respondent-appellee.
    Case Number: No. 08-99022

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 15739ROBERT CHARLES TOWERY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. DORA B. SCHRIRO, Respondent-Appellee.

  • Giraldo v. Bradt

    Publication Date: 2012-11-20
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U. S. District Court, Eastern District
    Judge: District Judge Joseph F. Bianco
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Petitioner is proceeding pro se. Respondent is represented by Karla L. Lato, Suffolk County District Attorney, Riverhead, NY.
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 11-cv-2001 (JFB)

    Cite as: Giraldo v. Bradt, 11-cv-2001 (JFB), NYLJ 1202578933628, at *1 (EDNY, Decided September 5, 2012)District Judge Joseph F. B

  • July 13, 2010 | The American Lawyer

    California Supreme Court Eliminates Key Antitrust Defense; Pharma Companies to Face Price-Fixing Suit by Pharmacies

    For four decades, California's state antitrust laws have been out of synch with U.S. Supreme Court precedent. California, unlike the federal courts, permitted defendants to argue that direct purchaser

    1 minute read