• Giraldo v. Bradt

    Publication Date: 2012-11-20
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U. S. District Court, Eastern District
    Judge: District Judge Joseph F. Bianco
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Petitioner is proceeding pro se. Respondent is represented by Karla L. Lato, Suffolk County District Attorney, Riverhead, NY.
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 11-cv-2001 (JFB)

    Cite as: Giraldo v. Bradt, 11-cv-2001 (JFB), NYLJ 1202578933628, at *1 (EDNY, Decided September 5, 2012)District Judge Joseph F. B

  • July 13, 2010 | The American Lawyer

    California Supreme Court Eliminates Key Antitrust Defense; Pharma Companies to Face Price-Fixing Suit by Pharmacies

    For four decades, California's state antitrust laws have been out of synch with U.S. Supreme Court precedent. California, unlike the federal courts, permitted defendants to argue that direct purchaser

    1 minute read

  • Barry v. NYC, 11 CV 5533 (CLP)

    Publication Date: 2013-03-27
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Eastern District
    Judge: Magistrate Judge Cheryl L. Pollak
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 11 CV 5533 (CLP)

    Cite as: Barry v. NYC, 11 CV 5533 (CLP), NYLJ 1202593594295, at *1 (EDNY, D March 21, 2013)Magistrate Judge Cheryl L. PollakD

  • L.A. Printex Industries, Inc. v. Aeropostale, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2012-06-13
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-04-09
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: John F. Walter, District Judge, Presiding Before: Dorothy W. Nelson, Ronald M. Gould, and Sandra S. Ikuta, Circuit Judges.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Scott A. Burroughs (argued), Stephen Doniger, and Regina Y. Yeh, Doniger / Burroughs APC, Culver City, California, for the plaintiff-appellant.
    for defendant: Deborah F. Sirias (argued) and Robert M. Collins, Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP, Los Angeles, California; Jeffrey A. Miller, Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP, San Diego, California; Kristin L. Holland, Cory A. Baskin, and Zia F. Moddabber, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Los Angeles, California; and Jay Shapiro, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, New York, New York, for the defendants-appellees.

    Case Number: No. 10-56187

    Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 6457 L.A. PRINTEX INDUSTRIES, INC., a California Corporation, Plaintiff-counter-defendant Appellant, v.

  • In re Marriage of Woolsey

    Publication Date: 2013-10-23
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2013-10-22
    Court: C.A. 3rd
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Gary, Till & Burlingham and Steven R. Burlingham for Respondent.
    for defendant: Law Office of Stephanie J. Finelli and Stephanie J. Finelli for Appellant.

    Case Number: No. C067800

    Cite as 13 C.D.O.S. 11675 In re the Marriage of ANNA and CLARK WOOLSEY. ANNA WOOLSEY, Respondent, p class="ca

  • In the Interest of T.T.F., A Child

    Publication Date: 2010-12-05
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-12-02
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 2
    Judge: Anne Gardner Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: NO. 02-09-00382-CV

    OPINIONI. IntroductionAppellant S.M. appeals the trial court's judgment terminating the parent-child relationship between herself and her son, T.T.F. In four issues, S.M. contends that she wa

  • L.A. Printex Industries, Inc. v. Aeropastale, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2012-04-09
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-04-09
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: John F. Walter, District Judge, Presiding Before: Dorothy W. Nelson, Ronald M. Gould, and Sandra S. Ikuta, Circuit Judges.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Scott A. Burroughs (argued), Stephen Doniger, and Regina Y. Yeh, Doniger / Burroughs APC, Culver City, California, for the plaintiff-appellant.
    for defendant: Deborah F. Sirias (argued) and Robert M. Collins, Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP, Los Angeles, California; Jeffrey A. Miller, Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP, San Diego, California; Kristin L. Holland, Cory A. Baskin, and Zia F. Moddabber, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Los Angeles, California; and Jay Shapiro, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, New York, New York, for the defendants-appellees.

    Case Number: No. 10-56187

    Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 3855 L.A. PRINTEX INDUSTRIES, INC., a California Corporation, Plaintiff-counter-defendant Appellant, v.

  • Flynn v. Flynn

    Publication Date: 2004-05-17
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 2nd Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number:

    By Santucci, J.P.; Smith, Luciano and Adams, JJ. Emily Flynn, etc., plaintiff, v. Stephen J. Flynn def (Action No. 1) (Index No. 10068/00) Stephen J. F

  • Matter of Ford v Smith

    Publication Date: 2005-11-17
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 3rd Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 97572

    Decided and Entered: November 17, 2005 97572 ________________________________ In the Matter of COREY FORD, Petitioner, v MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT b

  • July 1, 2013 | The American Lawyer

    Arbitration Scorecard 2013: Contract Disputes

    Corrections, 9/11/2013: In an earlier version of this chart, the caption for Egyptian Natural Gas Holding Company and Egyptian General Petroleum Corporation v. East Medi

    1 minute read