• Albany County, Surrogate's Court: August 3, 2021

    Publication Date: 2021-08-05
    Practice Area: Legal Ethics and Attorney Discipline
    Industry:
    Court: Surrogate's Court, Albany County
    Judge: Surrogate Stacy L. Pettit
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: DOCKET

    Albany County, Surrogate's Court: August 3, 2021

  • Bellin v. Zucker

    Publication Date: 2021-08-05
    Practice Area: Civil Rights
    Industry: Health Care | State and Local Government
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
    Judge: Circuit Judge Susan Carney
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Plaintiff-Appellant Rosalind Bellin: Nina Keilin, Law Office of Nina Keilin, New York, NY, on the brief, Aytan Y. Bellin, Bellin & Associates LLC, White Plains, NY.
    for defendant: for Defendant-Appellee Howard A. Zucker: Caroline A. Olsen, Assistant Solicitor General of Counsel, Barbara D. Underwood, Solicitor General, New York State Office of the Attorney General, New York, NY. For Defendant-Appellee ElderServe Health, Inc., DBA RiverSpring at Home: Mara R. Lieber, on the brief, Brian T. McGovern, Crowell & Moring LLP, New York, NY. For National Health Law Program, Center for Medicare Advocacy, and Justice in Aging, Amici Curiae in support of Plaintiff-Appellant Rosalind Bellin: Martha Jane Perkins and Sarah Somers, National Health Law Program, Chapel Hill, NC; Alice Bers, Center for Medicare Advocacy, Willimantic, CT. For Empire Justice Center and New York Legal Assistance Group, Amici Curiae in support of Plaintiff-Appellant Rosalind Bellin: Benjamin W. Taylor, New York Legal Assistance Group, New York, NY.

    Case Number: 20-1463

    Medicaid Beneficiary Shows MLTC Personal Care Hours Channeled by Contract, Regulation

  • August 4, 2021 | Law.com

    ESG Gets Real, Law Schools Tech Alumni, Uber's Australia Battle: The Morning Minute

    Here's the news you need to start your day.

    4 minute read

  • Shah v. 20 East 64th Street LLC

    Publication Date: 2021-08-04
    Practice Area: Contractual Disputes | Personal Injury | Real Estate
    Industry: Real Estate
    Court: Appellate Division, First Department
    Judge: Justice Peter Moulton
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Appellants-Respondents: Kenneth G. Roberts of counsel, Law Office of Kenneth G. Robert, P.C., New York.
    for defendant: For 20 East 64th Street LLC, Respondent-Appellant: Vivian Turetsky, Michael A. Bono and Douglas Giombarrese of counsel, Wade Clark Mulcahy, LLP, New York. For Urban Foundation/Engineering, LLC, Respondent: Eric Z. Leiter and Anthony F. DeStefano of counsel, Mauro Lilling Naparty, LLP, Woodbury. For Tri State Construction Corp., Respondent: Jonathan P. Shaub, Timothy R. Capowski, Sofya Uvaydov and Sean E. Harriton of counsel, Shaub, Ahmuty, Citrin & Spratt LLP, Lake Success.

    Case Number: 156305/15

    Affirmation of Rulings on Breach, Tort Claims in Trial on Mansion's Damage Explained

  • Mcdaniel v. The State

    Publication Date: 2021-08-04
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: Georgia Court of Appeals
    Judge: Presiding Judge Barnes
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: David Williams, (Western Circuit Public Defender's Office), Athens, for appellant.
    for defendant: Deborah Gonzalez, Victoria Goff, (Western Judicial Circuit District Attorney's Office), Athens, Kenneth Mauldin, (District Attorney), Athens, for other party.

    Case Number: A21A0590

    Sentences Imposed for Two Counts of Child Cruelty Are Vacated and Remanded for Re-Sentencing; Trial Court Employed Improper Analysis to Answer Merger Question

  • U.S. v. Perez

    Publication Date: 2021-08-04
    Practice Area: Civil Rights | Constitutional Law | Criminal Law | Immigration Law
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
    Judge: Circuit Judge John Walker
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Appellee: Kevin Trowel, on the brief, Tanya Hajjar, Assistant United States Attorneys, for Mark J. Lesko, Acting United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York.
    for defendant: For Defendant-Appellant Javier Perez: Yuanchung Lee, Federal Defenders of New York, Inc., Appeals Bureau.

    Case Number: 19-620-cr

    18 USC §922(g)(5), as Applied to Undocumented Alien, Withstands 'Intermediate Scrutiny'

  • Thane v. Thane

    Publication Date: 2021-08-04
    Practice Area: Landlord Tenant Law
    Industry:
    Court: Civil Court, Queens
    Judge: Judge Clinton Guthrie
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Attorneys for Petitioner: Arthur A. Edwards, Esq. Arthur A. Edwards, PLLC, Brooklyn, NY.
    for defendant: Attorneys for Respondent Michelle Thane: Robert S. Sikorski, Esq. Busson & Sikorski, P.C., New York, NY.

    Case Number: 65279/18

    No Newly Discovered Evidence to Justify Vacating Judgment of Possession; Dismissal Denied

  • Jackson v. Nassau County

    Publication Date: 2021-08-04
    Practice Area: Civil Rights | Criminal Law
    Industry: State and Local Government
    Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, U.S. - EDNY
    Judge: District Judge Joanna Seybert
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Plaintiff: Gabriel Paul Harvis, Esq., Baree N. Fett, Esq., Elefterakis Elefterakis & Panek, New York, New York.
    for defendant: For Nassau County Defendants: Peter A. Meisels, Esq., Janine A. Mastellone, Esq., John Martin Flannery, Esq., Lalit Kumar Loomba, Esq., Allison Michelle Holubis, Esq., Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker, White Plains, New York. For Village of Freeport Defendants: Keith Michael Corbett, Esq., Stephanie L. Tanzi, Esq., Harris Beach PLLC, New York, New York.

    Case Number: 18-CV-3007

    Malicious Prosecution, Indifference Pleaded by Man Wrongfully Convicted of 1994 Murder

  • August 3, 2021 | The Recorder

    Uber Drivers Sue Rideshare Giant to Gain Employee Protections in Australia

    The case follows a similar action in the U.K. where the Supreme Court found drivers should be classified as workers, as opposed to contractors.

    3 minute read

  • August 3, 2021 | Law.com

    Australian Uber Drivers Sue Rideshare Giant to Gain Employee Protections

    The case follows a similar action in the U.K. where the Supreme Court found drivers should be classified as workers, as opposed to contractors.

    3 minute read