• Ragbir v. Homan

    Publication Date: 2018-05-30
    Practice Area: Immigration Law
    Industry: Federal Government
    Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, U.S. - SDNY
    Judge: District Judge P. Kevin Castel
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Anthony D Boccanfuso, Ada Añon, Robert Stanton Jones, John L. Freedman, William C. Perdue, Daniel F. Jacobson, Emily Newhouse Dillingham, Sally Pei, Stephen Wirth, Andrew T. Tutt, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP.
    for defendant: Attorneys for Plaintiffs: Alina Das, Jessica Louise Rofé, Brittany Castle (Legal Intern), Jeremy Cutting (Legal Intern), Washington Square Legal Services, Inc.; Attorneys for Defendants: Geoffrey S. Berman, United States Attorney, Jeffrey Stuart Oestericher, Brandon Matthew Waterman, Steven John Kochevar, Joseph Nicholas Cordaro, Assistant United States Attorneys.; Attorneys for New York Elected Officials, Amici Curiae: Joshua B. Picker, Henry Liu, Jordan L. Moran, Tracy O. Zinsou, David Watnick, Covington & Burling LLP.; Attorneys for 140 Religious Leaders, Amici Curiae: Harry Sandick, Peter A. Nelson, Lauren M. Capaccio, Zachary Kolodin, Michael R. McDonald (Admission pending) Patterson, Belknap, Webb & Tyler LLP.; Yosef J. Riemer, Katherine Anne Rocco, Kirkland & Ellis LLP.; Trudy S. Rebert, Nicholas Espiritu, Jessica R. Hanson, National Immigration Law Center.; Attorneys for Adelante Alabama Worker Center and Twenty Other Groups, Amici Curiae: Amy S. Taylor, Sienna Fontaine, Kendal K. Nystedt, Make the Road New York.; Attorneys for Certain Scholars, Public Interest Advocates and Organizations, Amici Curiae: Penny Marina Venetis, International Human Rights Clinic of Rutgers University.; Joshua A. Geltzer, Amy L. Marshak, Robert D. Friedman, Seth Wayne, Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection Georgetown University Law Center.; Attorney for Institute For Constitutional Advocacy and Protection at Georgetown Law Center and Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, Amici Curiae: Jameel Jaffer, Alex Abdo, Carrie DeCell, Ramya Krishnan (Admission pending), Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University.; Attorneys for Immigrant Defense Project, Amicus Curiae: Ryan Alexander Muennich, Andrew Wachtenheim (Admission pending).

    Case Number: 18-cv-1159

    Removal Order's Execution Does Not Support Activist's Retaliation, Discrimination Claims

  • Matter of 264 W. 117th St. Tenant Ass'n v. N.Y.C. Dep't Hous. Pres. & Dev.

    Publication Date: 2018-05-30
    Practice Area: Landlord Tenant Law
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court, New York
    Judge: Justice Arlene Bluth
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 452372/2017

    HPD's Decision to Terminate Building From TIL Program Not Arbitrary; Annulment Denied

  • Godoy v. BMW of N. Am. LLC

    Publication Date: 2018-05-30
    Practice Area: Civil Procedure
    Industry: Automotive
    Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, U.S. - EDNY
    Judge: District Judge Denis Hurley
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Plaintiffs: By Dianne E. Malone, Esq., Dino G. Amoroso, Esq., Amoroso & Associates, New York, New York.
    for defendant: For Defendants Autoliv, Inc. and Autoliv ASP, Inc.: By Peter J. Fazio, Esq., Walsy K. Saez Aguirre, Esq., Aaronson Rappaport Feinstein & Deutsch, LLP, New York, New York.

    Case Number: 16-CV-5502

    Claims in Airbag Deployment Suit Dismissed Against Firms Lacking State Business Contacts

  • May 29, 2018 | The American Lawyer

    Amid Anthem Debate, NFL Players Disclose Top Legal Billers

    While the National Football League seeks to restrict its players from kneeling for the national anthem, a new government filing by a players' union shows that it has some high-powered counsel at its disposal in Gibson Dunn, Latham, Quinn Emanuel and Winston & Strawn.

    1 minute read

  • May 29, 2018 | New York Law Journal

    The Ancient Common Law Faithless Servant Rule: Still Relevant in New York

    The doctrine that faithless servants paid on a “task-by-task” basis need only to forfeit their salary relating to disloyal activities initially developed in federal courts interpreting New York law.

    1 minute read

  • Appellate Division, First Department: May 24, 2018

    Publication Date: 2018-05-29
    Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, First Department
    Judge: Unsigned
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: DOCKET

    Appellate Division, First Department: May 24, 2018

  • Appellate Division, Second Department: May 24, 2018

    Publication Date: 2018-05-29
    Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, Second Department
    Judge: Unsigned
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: DOCKET

    Appellate Division, Second Department: May 24, 2018

  • Appellate Division, Second Department: May 29, 2018

    Publication Date: 2018-05-29
    Practice Area: Appellate Division Activity | Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, Second Department
    Judge: Unsigned
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: DOCKET

    Appellate Division, Second Department: May 29, 2018

  • Caffee v. The State

    Publication Date: 2018-05-29
    Practice Area: Constitutional Law | Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: Georgia Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Peterson
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Gregory A. Hicks (Law Offices of Gregory A. Hicks), Woodstock, for appellant.
    for defendant: David Martin McElyea, Jessica K. Moss, Carlton Todd Hayes (Cherokee County Solicitor General's Office), Canton, for appellee.

    Case Number: S17G1691

    Probable Cause Will Not Justify Warrantless Search Absent Exception to Warrant Requirement

  • Sullivan v. Texas Ethics

    Publication Date: 2018-05-28
    Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Government
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Justice Puryear
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 03-17-00392-CV

    After receiving complaints from two Texas legislators, appellee, the Texas Ethics Commission, conducted a hearing and found that appellant, the president of Empower Texans, a nonprofit corporation, had failed to register as a lobbyist and assessed at $10,000 penalty.