Filter This View

  • Torch Liquidating Trust v. Stockstill

    Publication Date: 2009-02-27
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-02-23
    Court: 5th Cir.
    Judge: King, Circuit Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 08-30404

    Before KING, DENNIS, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.Torch Liquidating Trust, through its trustee Bridge Associates L.L.C., brings this suit alleging breach of fiduciary duties by the officers and direct

  • Bleecker Street Tenants Corp. v. Bleeker Jones LLC, et al., No. 12

    Publication Date: 2011-02-25
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: New York State Court of Appeals
    Judge: Opinion by Judge Jones. Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Smith and Pigott concur. Judge Read concurs in result in an opinion. Judge Graffeo dissents and votes to affirm in an opinion.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jeffrey L. Braun, for appellants.
    for defendant: Marilyn K. Genoa, for respondent.
    Case Number: No. 12

    Cite as: Bleecker Street Tenants Corp. v. Bleeker Jones LLC, et al., Index 12, NYLJ 1202483202803, at *1 (Ct. of App., Decided February 24, 2011)Opinion by Judg

  • In Re World Trade Center Disaster Site Litigation, 21 MC 100

    Publication Date: 2009-03-02
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-02-18
    Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District
    Judge: Alvin Hellerstein
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 21 MC 100

    District Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein U.S. DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Judge Hellerstein [Edited and Charts Deleted for Publication]

  • Brooks v. City of San Mateo

    Publication Date: 2000-06-07
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2000-06-05
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: WOOD, KOZINSKI, and RYMER, Circuit Judges
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: John F. Prentice and Sheila A. Reid
    for defendant: Nancy E. Pritikin, et. al.
    Case Number: No. 98-15818

    The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion. We consider the legal implications of a single, rather unsavory, episode of workplace sexual harassment.

  • Tate v. Hernandez

    Publication Date: 2009-03-10
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-03-05
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 7
    Judge: Patrick A. Pirtle Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 07-07-0351-CV

    Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ.OPINION"To be, or not to be. That is the question." William Shakespeare, Hamlet, Act III, scene i While perhaps overstating the significance of is

  • Langston v. Smith, 10-3045-pr

    Publication Date: 2011-01-07
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
    Judge: Before: Feinberg, Newman, and Lynch, C.JJ.s
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: WARREN S. LANDAU (Lynn W. L. Fahey, on the brief), Appellate Advocates, New York, New York, for Petitioner-Appellee.
    for defendant: MORGAN J. DENNEHY, Assistant District Attorney (Leonard Joblove, Ann Bordley, and Victor Barall, Assistant District Attorneys of Counsel, on the brief), for Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Kings County, Brooklyn, New York, for Respondent-Appellant.
    Case Number: 10-3045-pr

    Cite as: Langston v. Smith, 10-3045-pr, NYLJ 1202477448155, at *1 (2d Cir., Decided January 7, 2010)Before: Feinberg, Newman, and Lynch, C.JJ.sp class="dec

  • In re Estate of Vrana

    Publication Date: 2010-11-18
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-11-17
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 4
    Judge: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 04-09-00377-CV

    OPINIONSitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice, Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice, Steven C. Hilbig, Justice.AFFIRMEDThis is an appeal from a judgment in a probate case awarding attorneys' fees

  • In re Grand Jury

    Publication Date: 2002-04-08
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2002-04-05
    Court: 3rd Cir.
    Judge: Fuentes, Circuit Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 01-4042

    PRECEDENTIALArgued on February 28, 2002OPINION OF THE COURTThis case requires us to resolve the conflict that arises when a grand jury subpoena seeks production of evidence ostensibly shielde

  • December 15, 2008 | New York Law Journal

    Ethics and Criminal Practice

    Your client has just phoned, after having been served with a grand jury subpoena. He is scared out of his wits, though, fortunately, not directly vulnerable in the inquiry. The subject

    1 minute read

  • Blankenship v. Allstate Insurance Company

    Publication Date: 2010-07-01
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-06-29
    Court: C.A. 3rd
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Barr & Mudford and Dugan Barr for Plaintiff and Appellant.
    for defendant: Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal, Michael Barnes, and Manuel Alvarez, Jr., for Defendant and Respondent.
    Case Number: No. C059423

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 8406DAKOTA BLANKENSHIP, a Minor, etc., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. ALLSTATE INSURANC