• Hayes v. Estee Lauder Companies, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2006-11-30
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 2nd Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number:

    By Miller, J.P.; Goldstein, Skelos and Fisher, JJ. Dennis Hayes, ap, v. Estee Lauder Companies, Inc. res (Index No. 17633-01) In an action, int

  • Glassberg v. Glassberg, 24307/05

    Publication Date: 2009-05-04
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-04-15
    Court: Supreme Court, Suffolk County
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number:

    Justice Mark D. Cohen SUFFOLK COUNTY Supreme Court Justice Mark D. Cohen DECISION AFTER TRIAL This is an action for absolute divorce. It w

  • Beth M.

    Publication Date: 2006-08-25
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2006-07-25
    Court: Supreme Court, Suffolk County
    Judge: Ruth Balkin
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number:

    SUFFOLK COUNTY Supreme Court Justice Balkin "Whoever you are-I have always depended on

  • Everhome Mortgage Co. v. Sirignano, 8479/2010

    Publication Date: 2013-08-28
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court, Suffolk County, I.A.S. Part 33
    Judge: Justice Thomas F. Whelan
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Attys. For Plaintiff: Rosicki, Rosicki & Assoc., PC, Plainview, NY.
    for defendant: Virgilio Paul Sirignano, c/o David Harrow, Deer Park, NY.

    Case Number: 8479/2010

    Cite as: Everhome Mortgage Co. v. Sirignano, 8479/2010, NYLJ 1202616996511, at *1 (Sup., SUF, Decided August 5, 2013) 8479/2010 Justice Thomas F.

  • Matter of McNally

    Publication Date: 2003-03-10
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court, Suffolk County
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number:

    Justice Berler MATTER OF McNALLY — This is a proceeding for the appointment of a guardian for Marion A. W. pursuant to article 81 of the Mental Hygiene Law. With the consent of Ms

  • Financial Freedom SFC v. Slinkosky, 11879/2009

    Publication Date: 2010-07-27
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court, Suffolk County
    Judge: Justice William B. Rebolini
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Plaintiff's Counsel: McCabe, Weisberg & Conway, P.C.
    for defendant: Defendant's Counsel: Alizio & Galfunt LLP

    Case Number: 11879/2009

    Justice William B. ReboliniDecided: June 24, 2010Plaintiff's Counsel: McCabe, Weisberg & Conway, P.C.p class="attorne

  • Scher v. Scher, 29475-2007

    Publication Date: 2010-02-01
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-01-26
    Court: Supreme Court, Suffolk County
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: No CaseNumber

    Justice Jerry Garguilo SUFFOLK COUNTY Supreme Court Plaintiff's Attorney: Philip J. Castrovinci, P.C. Defendant's Attorney: Shlimbaum & Shlimbaum

  • R.F.R. v. D.A.R., 05-06488

    Publication Date: 2006-09-18
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2006-08-23
    Court: Supreme Court, Suffolk County
    Judge: Karen Murphy
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 05-06488

    SUFFOLK COUNTY Supreme Court For Plaintiff: Andrew R. Wolk For Defendant: John G. Griffin Justice Murphy A trial was held on March 9, March 10, Apr

  • Quality King Distributors, Inc. v E M ESR, Inc

    Publication Date: 2007-01-25
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 2nd Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number:

    SPOLZINO, J.P., FLORIO, LIFSON, COVELLO, JJ. Quality King Distributors, Inc., appellant, v E&M ESR, Inc., respondent. (Index No. 10632/03) Edwards Angell

  • Bonnie B. v. Michael B.

    Publication Date: 2004-12-03
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court, Suffolk County
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number:

    Supreme Court Justice Pines This case presents several complex issues concerning the prohibition against use of the same income stream for more than one purpose as well as whe