• Curtis & Associates, P.C. v. Callaghan, 11831/10

    Publication Date: 2012-08-02
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court, Westchester County
    Judge: Justice Alan D. Scheinkman
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: The following papers numbered 1 to 87 were read on (1) the motion (Seq. No. 11) by respondent, Janet T. Callaghan ("Callaghan"), for an Order to vacate any default with regard to the October 28, 2011 Order of this Court, as modified by the February 8, 2012 Order of this Court, that so-ordered subpoenas duces tecum and ad testificandum on respondent, to grant renewal and/or to vacate the aforementioned February 8, 2012 Order of this Court to delete certain provisions therefrom, and to grant a protective order pursuant to CPLR 5240; (2) the motion (Seq. No. 12) by petitioner, Curtis & Associates, P.C. ("Curtis"), to stay the return date on the foregoing motion (Seq. No. 11); (3) the motion by petitioner Curtis (Seq. No. 14) to cite Callaghan for civil and/or criminal contempt for alleged failure to comply with prior discovery Orders of this Court; (4) the motion by respondent Callaghan (Seq. No. 15) to vacate such parts of the May 11, 2012 Order of this Court that directed respondent to appear personally before this Court on June 8, 2012, and provided that no further motions be made except upon prior written consent of this Court, and granting sanctions against petitioner in the amount of ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00); and (5) this Court's inquiry as to whether the conduct herein of respondent's counsel, Jeffrey Levitt, Esq., is sanctionable pursuant to Part 130-1.1 of the Uniform Rules of Trial Court:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 11831/10

    Cite as: Curtis & Associates, P.C. v. Callaghan, 11831/10, NYLJ 1202565654161, at *1 (Sup., WE, Decided July 24, 2012)Justice Alan D. Scheinkmanp

  • M.A.D., Plaintiff v. M.M., Defendant, Index Number Redacted

    Publication Date: 2011-06-02
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court, Westchester County
    Judge: Justice Linda Christopher
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Eric Vaughn-Flam, Esq., Sanders Ortoli Vaughn-Flam Rosenstadt LLP, New York, NY.
    for defendant: Catherine M. Staropoli, Esq., Hyman & Gilbert, Larchmont, NY.

    Case Number: Index Number Redacted

    Cite as: M.A.D. v. M.M., Index # Redacted, NYLJ 1202495934962, at *1 (Sup., WE, Decided May 13, 2011)Justice Linda ChristopherDecid

  • Henning v. Ritz

    Publication Date: 2004-08-19
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court, Westchester County
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number:

    Supreme Court Justice Spolzino This is an action for divorce and ancillary relief, in which the parties were divorced by a judgment of this court entered January 11, 1999 (Lef

  • United Water New Rochelle, Inc. v. Planning Board of Town of Eastchester

    Publication Date: 2003-12-15
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 2nd Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number:

    United Water New Rochelle, Inc., res, v. Planning Board of Town of Eastchester ap (Matter No. 1) (Index No. 3776/01) v Planning Board of Town of East

  • Bertone v Bertone

    Publication Date: 2005-02-07
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 2nd Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number:

    By Florio, J.P.; Adams, Miller and Goldstein, JJ. Mary Ann Bertone, res, v. Jeffrey Bertone, ap (Index No. 13550/95) In a matrimonial action in which the par

  • Wohl v Wohl

    Publication Date: 2006-02-07
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 2nd Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number:

    By Adams, J.P.; Crane, Goldstein and Skelos, JJ. Amiel Wohl, res, v. Rita M. Wohl, ap (Index No. 17842/80) In a matrimonial action in which the parties were

  • Matter of Ingraham v Planning Board of Town of Southeast

    Publication Date: 2007-01-30
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 2nd Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number:

    MILLER, J.P., SPOLZINO, RITTER, DILLON, JJ. In the Matter of Cherie Ingraham, et al., appellants, v Planning Board of Town of Southeast, et al., respondents. (Index

  • In the Matter of Basil Castrovinci Associates, Inc. v District 65 Pension Plan

    Publication Date: 2005-03-14
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 2nd Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number:

    By Florio, J.P.; Ritter, Goldstein and Fisher, JJ. In the Matter of Basil Castrovinci Associates, Inc., et al., appellants, v. District 65 Pension Plan, res (Index N

  • Salvati v Professional Security Bureau, Ltd.

    Publication Date: 2007-05-08
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 2nd Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number:

    ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, J.P. FRED T. SANTUCCI ANITA R. FLORIO RUTH C. BALKIN, JJ. Pierina Salvati, respondent, v Professional Security Bureau, Ltd., appellant. (Index No.

  • Goldberg v Lenihan

    Publication Date: 2007-03-13
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 2nd Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number:

    MILLER, J.P., SCHMIDT, RITTER and ANGIOLILLO, JJ. Kimberly Goldberg, etc., et al., appellants, v James Michael Lenihan, et al., defendants, Matthew R. Kreinces, et al., resp