• FKM Partnership, Ltd. v. Board of Regents of the University of Houston System

    Publication Date: 2008-06-09
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-06-06
    Court: Tx. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: Phil Johnson Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 05-0661

    Argued March 21, 2007JUSTICE JOHNSON delivered the opinion of the Court, in which CHIEF JUSTICE JEFFERSON, JUSTICE HECHT, JUSTICE O'NEILL, JUSTICE WAINWRIGHT, JUSTICE BRISTER, JUSTICE MEDINA, and J

  • January 26, 2004 | Texas Lawyer

    Ridgecrest Retirement & Healthcare v. Urban

    Click here for the full text of this de

    1 minute read

  • Forest Oil Corp. v. McAllen

    Publication Date: 2008-09-02
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-08-29
    Court: Tx. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: Don R. Willett Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 06-0178

    Argued October 16, 2007JUSTICE WILLETT delivered the opinion of the Court, in which J USTICE HECHT, JUSTICE O'N EILL, JUSTICE WAINWRIGHT, JUSTICE BRISTER, JUSTICE GREEN, and J USTICE JOHNSON joined

  • August 14, 2006 | Texas Lawyer

    NCED Mental Health Inc. v. Kidd

    Click here for the full text of this decisionFACTS: NCED Mental Health, Inc. d/b/a NCED Mental Hea

    1 minute read

  • Walters v. State

    Publication Date: 2011-12-08
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-12-07
    Court: Tex. Crim. App.
    Judge: Womack, J.,
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: NOS. PD-0064-11 & PD-0065-11

    Womack, J., delivered the opinion of the unanimous Court.In September, 2007, a jury found the appellant guilty of two counts of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon.a HREF="#D*fn1" NAME="S*f

  • Basic Capital Management, Inc., American realty trust, Inc v. Dynex commercial, Inc. and Dynex Capital, Inc

    Publication Date: 2011-04-05
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-04-01
    Court: Tx. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: Nathan L. Hecht Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: NO. 08-0244

    Argued September 10, 2009JUSTICE HECHT delivered the opinion of the Court.This is an action for breach of a commitment to provide financing for future real estate investments. The borrowers were

  • Grant v. Joe Myers Toyota Inc.

    Publication Date: 2000-01-20
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2000-01-20
    Court: Tex. Ct. App.
    Judge: Murphy, Anderson, Hudson
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: No. 14-98-01210-CV

    The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion.MAJORITY OPINION After appellant Bobbie Grant (Grant) filed suit against Joe Myers Toyota, Inc. (Joe

  • Ashley v. Hawkins

    Publication Date: 2009-06-29
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-06-26
    Court: Tx. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: Justice Green
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 07-0572

    Argued December 11, 2008In this case, we consider whether section 16.063 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code tolls the limitations period when a defendant leaves Texas following a motor v

  • Rabo Agrifinance Inc v. Terra XXI Ltd.

    Publication Date: 2009-10-14
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-09-22
    Court: 5th Cir.
    Judge: Edith H. Jones, Chief Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 08-10143

    Published opinionREVISED SEPTEMBER 25, 2009Before JONES, Chief Judge, and WIENER and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.This is at least the sixth case, the fourth before the Fifth Circuit, arising ou

  • Rabo Agrifinance Inc. v. Terra XXI LTD

    Publication Date: 2009-11-03
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-09-22
    Court: 5th Cir.
    Judge: Edith H. Jones, Chief Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 08-10143

    Published opinionREVISED October 28, 2009Before JONES, Chief Judge, and WIENER and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.This is at least the sixth case, the fourth before the Fifth Circuit, arising out