• December 13, 2012 | New Jersey Law Journal

    The Perils of Overtime Exemptions and the Limited Role of the Good-Faith Defense

    In the absence of clear, direct guidance on whether a certain class of employee falls within an exemption to o e laws, an employer takes a leap of faith in deciding to forgo payment of o

    1 minute read

  • In Re the Office of the Attorney General

    Publication Date: 2013-03-13
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2013-03-08
    Court: Tx. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: Debra H. Lehrmann Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: NO. 11-0255

    ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUSArgued February 27, 2012JUSTICE LEHRMANN delivered the opinion of the Court."The court may not find a respondent in contempt of court for failure to pay

  • In re Transtexas Gas Corp.

    Publication Date: 2010-02-12
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-02-10
    Court: 5th Cir.
    Judge: Leslie H. Southwick, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: Nos. 08-41128 & 08-20401

    Before BARKSDALE, SOUTHWICK, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.This opinion addresses the issues in two related cases. The appeals were not consolidated prior to argument, and we do not consolidate them n

  • Stroman v. Thaler

    Publication Date: 2010-04-14
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-04-12
    Court: 5th Cir.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 07-20198

    Published opinionBefore GARWOOD, SMITH and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.Petitioner Stroman appeals the district court's dismissal, under 28 U.S.C. 2244(d), of his section 2254 petition challenging hi

  • Solar Applications Engineering, Inc v. T.A. Operatingcorporation

    Publication Date: 2010-12-05
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-12-03
    Court: Tx. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: Dale Wainwright Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 06-0243

    Argued October 16, 2007JUSTICE WAINWRIGHT delivered the opinion of the Court.JUSTICE GREEN did not participate in the decision.In this case, a general contractor and an owner dispute perfo

  • Luna v. Pierro

    Publication Date: 2004-04-19
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Civil Court, Queens County
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number:

    Civil Court Special Term, Part 24 Judge Markey The present focus of this unusual controversy surrounding the purchase of a vehicle is a motion by the law firm represen

  • June 9, 2003 | Texas Lawyer

    Pollard v. Merkel

    Civil LitigationNo. 05-01-01244-CV, 5/23/2003.a href=http://www.law.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=OpenMarket/Xcelerate/View&c=LawDecision&cid=10524407

    1 minute read

  • August 21, 2006 | Texas Lawyer

    Volume Millwork Inc. v. West Houston Airport Corp.

    Click here for the full text of this decisionFACTS: Volume Millwork leased a hangar at the West Ho

    1 minute read

  • Flame S.A., Plaintiff v. Industrial Carriers, Inc., Defendant, 10 Civ. 9557 (LAK)

    Publication Date: 2011-04-20
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
    Judge: District Judge Lewis A. Kaplan
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Attorney for Plaintiff: William R. Bennett, III, Bennett, Giuliano, Mcdonnell & Perrone, LLP
    for defendant: Attorneys for Defendant: George M. Chalos, Kerri M. D'Ambrosio, Chalos & Co., P.C.

    Case Number: 10 Civ. 9557 (LAK)

    Cite as: Flame S.A. v. Industrial Carriers, Inc., 10 Civ. 9557 (LAK), NYLJ 1202490623973, at *1 (SDNY, Decided April 13, 2011)District Judge Lewis A.

  • Churchill Forge, Inc. v. Brown

    Publication Date: 2001-11-19
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-11-15
    Court: Tex. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: Craig T. Enoch Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 00-0270

    On Petition for Review from the Court of Appeals for the Third District of TexasArgued on January 10, 2001Justice Enoch delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Justice Hecht, Justice Owen,