• Smith v. State

    Publication Date: 2001-08-02
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-07-26
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 13
    Judge: Justice Castillo
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: NUMBERS 13-00-14

    On appeal from the 130th District Court of Matagorda County, Texas.OPINIONThe original opinion in this case*fn2 is withdrawn and the following opinion substitut

  • City of Dallas v. Chicory Court Simpson Stuart, L.P.

    Publication Date: 2008-11-25
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-11-24
    Court: Tx. App. Dist. 5
    Judge: Amos L. Mazzant Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 05-08-00262-CV

    REVERSE and RENDEROPINIONBefore Chief Justice Thomas and Justices Wright and Mazzant.Chicory Court Simpson Stuart, L.P. sued the City of Dallas, claiming that the City unconstitutionally took

  • Langford v. Employees Retirement System of Texas

    Publication Date: 2002-04-29
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2002-04-25
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 3
    Judge: Bea Ann Smith, Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 03-01-00081-CV

    This case raises similar issues and is controlled by our recent decision in Flores v. Employees Retirement System, No. 03-01- 00074-CV, 2002 Tex. App. LEXIS 2721 (Austin Apr. 18, 2002, no pet. h.). Wh

  • Compass Bank v. Bent Creek Investments, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2001-07-24
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-07-19
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 2
    Judge: Anne Gardner Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 2-00-299-CV

    FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF TARRANT COUNTYOPINIONI. IntroductionThis appeal involves ad valorem taxes. Appellee Bent Creek Investments, Inc. sued Appellant Compass Bank for a breach of

  • Miller v. State

    Publication Date: 2010-11-08
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-11-08
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 2
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: Nos. 2-09-167-CR, 2-09-168-CR & 2-09-169-CR

    OPINION ON PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEWAfter reviewing both the State's petition and Appellant's petition for discretionary review, we withdraw our opinion and judgment of August 31, 2010,

  • Winston v. State

    Publication Date: 2002-04-03
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2002-03-28
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 14
    Judge: Leslie Brock Yates Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 14-00-00987-CR

    AFFIRMED.OPINIONA jury convicted appellant, Marcus Omar Winston, of burglary of a habitation and assessed punishment at six years' confinement and a $2,000 fine. In two points of error, appellan

  • In re B.N.A.

    Publication Date: 2009-02-25
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-02-24
    Court: Tx. App. Dist. 5
    Judge: Jim Moseley Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 05-07-01008-CV

    VACATED IN PART AND AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED AND RENDERED IN PARTOPINIONBefore Justices Moseley, Richter, and Francis.The Office of the Attorney General (OAG) appeals from: (1) an order mod

  • Helm v. Swan

    Publication Date: 2001-06-28
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-06-27
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 4
    Judge: Phil Hardberger, Chief Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 04-00-00365-CV

    AFFIRMEDThomas R. Helm and Lisa Helm, individually and on behalf of minor children Diana Hera Helm, Christina Elaine Helm, and Sarah Marie Helm, (the "Helms") appeal the summary judgments granted b

  • City of Dallas v. Prado

    Publication Date: 2012-07-20
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-07-16
    Court: Tx. App. Dist. 5
    Judge: Robert M. Fillmore Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 05-11-01598-CV

    Reverse and Render; Opinion Filed July 16, 2012. OPINION Before Justices FitzGerald, Murphy, and Fillmore Opinion By Justice Fillmore In this interlocutory appeal,

  • In Re Arcelormittal Vinton Inc.

    Publication Date: 2011-01-06
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-01-05
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 8
    Judge: David Wellington Chew, Chief Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 08-09-00170-CV

    An Original Proceeding in MandamusOPINIONRelator, ArcelorMittal Vinton, Inc., asks this Court to issue a writ of mandamus compelling Respondent, the Hon. William E. Moody, Judge of the 34th Judi