Filter This View

  • Vega v. Vega

    Publication Date: 2019-09-02
    Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Justice Kreger
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 09-17-00468-CV

    Alfonso and Vondia Vegas married in January 2009.

  • Schmidt v. Crawford

    Publication Date: 2019-09-02
    Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Real Estate
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Justice Goodman
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 01-18-00846-CV

    Plaintiffs all signed deeds of trusts to their homes as security for bail bond loans and then sued, alleging defendants fraudulently altered these deeds to inflate the amount of indebtedness, and later filed the deeds in Harris County's real property records, thereby creating illegal liens on the plaintiffs' homesteads.

  • In the Interest of MM

    Publication Date: 2019-09-02
    Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Justice Pirtle
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 07-19-00105-CV

    In 2017, the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services initiated an investigation and ultimately removed appellant's eight children from her care for neglectful supervision, physical neglect, and physical abuse, much of which was instigated by appellant's boyfriend and father of some of the children.

  • Delgado v. Delgado

    Publication Date: 2019-09-02
    Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Justice Rodriguez
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 08-17-00163-CV

    After the parties stopped living together in 2015, husband filed for divorce.

  • AMEC v. Goats

    Publication Date: 2019-09-02
    Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Personal Injury
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Justice Kreger
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 09-18-00477-CV

    Appellees were injured when hot steam sprayed them while they were attempting to clear a plugged strainer on a sour water pump system.

  • Summers v. Gypsum

    Publication Date: 2019-09-02
    Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Contracts
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Justice Bourliot
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 14-18-00736-CV

    Action Gypsum Supply is a supplier of drywall and other building materials.

  • College Retail v. Jefferson

    Publication Date: 2019-09-02
    Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Real Estate | Tax
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Justice Benavides
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 13-18-00182-CV

    College Retail owns property in Jefferson County in which it leases space to Conn's Home Plus.

  • Sims v. Thomas

    Publication Date: 2019-09-02
    Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Real Estate | Tax
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Justice Whitehill
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 05-18-00730-CV

    Dallas County sued sisters Tina Thomas, Sandra Sims and Simone Johnson who inherited a property that had delinquent property taxes.

  • Claudia Patricia v. State of Texas

    Publication Date: 2019-09-02
    Practice Area: Criminal Appeals | Criminal Law | Evidence
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Justice McClure
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 08-18-00101-CR

    Appellant was convicted of possession of methamphetamine and "theft or attempted theft" of property.

  • In the Interest of KCL

    Publication Date: 2019-09-02
    Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Justice Poissant
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 14-18-00464-CV

    In this suit affecting the parent-child relationship, one of the fathers argued that the trial court abused its discretion by (1) ordering he had no right to possession or access to one of the children because he was not that child's biological father, which he claimed "involuntarily terminated" his parent-child relationship without clear and convincing evidence; and (2) ordering DNA testing when appellant was the child's presumed father and the four-year statute of limitations had passed.