• Hall v. Vasquez

    Publication Date: 2019-02-25
    Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Civil Procedure | Medical Malpractice
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Justice Martinez
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 04-18-00590-CV

    On appeal from an interlocutory order denying a motion to dismiss a suit for medical negligence, appellant argued that the trial court should have dismissed the suit because the supporting expert report was conclusory on the issue of causation.

  • Herrera v. Price

    Publication Date: 2019-02-25
    Practice Area: Civil Procedure | Damages | Personal Injury
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Justice O'Neill
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 05-18-00030-CV

    Appellants challenged the trial court's order granting summary judgment in favor of appellee, which declared appellant's claims as barred by the statute of limitations and further found that appellants did not demonstrate diligence in serving appellee.

  • Gordon v. Redelsperger

    Publication Date: 2019-02-25
    Practice Area: Damages | Evidence | Personal Injury
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Justice Bassel
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 02-17-00461-CV

    In this civil case, the jury found that appellant assaulted the appellee, and awarded appellee certain categories of nonpecuniary damages and denied him others.

  • Exxon Mobil v. The Insurance Company

    Publication Date: 2019-02-25
    Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Contractual Disputes | Insurance Law
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Guzman
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 17-0200

    Exxon hired Savage Refinery Services to work at its Baytown refinery.

  • ETX Successor v. Pridgeon

    Publication Date: 2019-02-25
    Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Creditors' and Debtors' Rights | Damages
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Justice Hoyle
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 12-18-00083-CV

    ETX Successor Tyler, formerly known as East Texas Medical Center, brought this interlocutory appeal of the trial court's denial of its motion to dismiss the declaratory judgment action filed by Terrie Pridgeon as guardian of the person of the estate of Jason C. Dubose.

  • Clayton v. Oldcastle Materials

    Publication Date: 2019-02-25
    Practice Area: Business Torts | Civil Appeals | Civil Rights
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Justice Kreger
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 09-18-00063-CV

    In this interlocutory appeal, appellants challenged the trial court's denial of their motion to dismiss under the Texas Citizens Protection Act.

  • Brooks PHS v. Bowerman

    Publication Date: 2019-02-25
    Practice Area: Civil Procedure | Real Estate | Trusts and Estates
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Justice Schenck
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 05-18-00356-CV

    Appellants challenged the trial court's dismissal of their quiet title action on two issues: that the trial court abused its discretion in (1) dismissing their action for want of prosecution and (2) in denying their motion to reinstate.

  • February 21, 2019 |

    MGR, Inc. v. Geico Cas. Co.

    An appellate court in Texas has affirmed a trial court’s decision granting summary judgment to an insurer in a case brought by an auto body shop over “prevailing market labor rates.”

    1 minute read

  • February 21, 2019 |

    Gonzales v. Allstate Vehicle & Prop. Ins. Co.

    A federal district court in Texas, citing appraisal of the insured’s claim and the insurer’s payment of the amount awarded by the appraisers, has granted summary judgment in favor of the insurer in the insured’s lawsuit.

    1 minute read

  • February 19, 2019 |

    In re City of Dickinson

    The Supreme Court of Texas has rejected an insured’s effort to broaden the scope of expert discovery to include material otherwise protected by the attorney-client privilege, concluding that the state’s discovery rules do not waive the attorney-client privilege when a client or its representative offers expert testimony.

    1 minute read