• March 8, 2018 |

    In re Hanover Lloyds Ins. Co.

    Click Here for FC&S Legal Expert AnalysisIn re Hanover Lloyds Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, DallasMarch 2, 2018, Opinion FiledNo.…

    1 minute read

  • Mitchell v. State Of Texas

    Publication Date: 2018-03-05
    Practice Area: Criminal Appeals | Criminal Law | Expert Witnesses
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Justice Caughey
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 01-16-00710-CR

    Three police officers responded to a domestic disturbance call and upon their arrival to the scene appellant jumped out a window and ran from them.

  • M C v. Pantego Camp

    Publication Date: 2018-03-05
    Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Wrongful Death
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Justice Sudderth
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 02-17-00022-CV

    J.G., who had been smoking marijuana and drinking heavily, and a female companion climbed over a four-foot-high fence with multiple No Trespassing signs into appellees camp, which was used as a summer camp and team building camp.

  • In Re Allstate Vehicle

    Publication Date: 2018-03-05
    Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Insurance Law
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Per Curiam
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 09-18-00024-CV

    One of appellant insurance companys insureds made a claim on her policy after her home was damaged in a storm.

  • Bush v. Lone Oak

    Publication Date: 2018-03-05
    Practice Area: Land Use and Planning | Real Estate
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Justice Radack
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 01-17-00140-CV

    Appellee, the title holder to land including a portion of Lone Oak Bayou, inquired withappellant, the commissioner of the Texas General Land Office, regarding the extent of state ownership in the bayou and the attendant waterways and beds to address a dispute as to whether it could prohibit duck hunters from building duck blinds in the bed of the bayou.

  • Singleton v. Bowman

    Publication Date: 2018-03-05
    Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Damages
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Justice Moseley
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 06-17-00082-CV

    Appellant was stopped in his automobile when he was struck from behind by a dump truck.

  • Home Comfortable v. Cooper

    Publication Date: 2018-03-05
    Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Damages
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Justice Christopher
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 14-16-00906-CV

    Appellants, a corporation and its president, induced appellees into starting a limited partnership and then denied them access to financial records and bank accounts, locked the business's doors, seized the business's assets, and gave the use of those assets to a new company.

  • Comerica Bank v. Progressive Trade

    Publication Date: 2018-03-05
    Practice Area: Banking and Finance Laws | Real Estate
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Justice Wise
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 14-17-00283-CV

    Appellees signed a promissory note with a bank that later merged with appellant.

  • State Of Texas v. Morello

    Publication Date: 2018-03-05
    Practice Area: Corporate Entities | Corporate Governance | Environmental Law
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Johnson
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 16-0457

    This matter involved respondents challenge to the assessment of civil penalties against him under the Texas Water Code for actions that he performed as an employee of non-party, after non-party was assessed penalties under the same section based on his actions.

  • Shamrock v. Texas Department

    Publication Date: 2018-03-05
    Practice Area: Civil Procedure | Government
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Per Curiam
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 16-0890

    The ultimate issue in this governmental-immunity case was whether petitioner, a Medicaid provider, was entitled to a contested-case hearing on the merits of the states claim to recoup alleged overpayments.