Search Results

November 26, 2014 | Law.com

Actavis Applies to Non-Cash Settlements

In FTC v. Actavis,133 S. Ct. 2223 (2013), the Supreme Court held that it was a potential violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act for a pharmaceutical patentee to settle patent litigation with an alleged generic infringer where the settlement involved a "substantial" cash "reverse" payment (i.e. the payment is made by the patentee to the alleged infringer) coupled with an agreement by which the generic manufacturer would stay out of the market for a fixed period of time.

1 minute read

In re NVIDIA Corporation Securities Litigation

Publication Date: 2014-10-02
Practice Area:
Industry:
Date Filed: 2014-10-02
Court: 9th Cir.
Judge: Richard Seeborg, District Judge, Presiding Before: Richard C. Tallman and Sandra S. Ikuta, Circuit Judges, and Beverly Reid O'Connell, District Judge.*
Attorneys: For plaintiff: David Brower (argued), Brower Piven, New York, New York, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
for defendant: James Kramer (argued) and Michael Torpey, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, LLP, San Francisco, California, for Defendants-Appellees.
Case Number: No. 11-17708

Cite as 14 C.D.O.S. 11522 IN RE: NVIDIA CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION, ROBERTO COHEN; NEW JERSEY CARPENTERS PENSIO

July 8, 2014 | The American Lawyer

The Churn: Venable Expands in L.A., Plus More Lateral Moves

A day after Hogan Lovells and Squire Patton Boggs started the third quarter with mergers abroad, Venable has gotten into the tie-up game by a href="http://www.venable.com/NEP/pressreleases/

1 minute read

June 10, 2014 | New York Law Journal

Referring Trade Secrets Theft for Criminal Prosecution

Cybercrime—including trade secrets theft—has famously been termed "the greatest transfer of wealth in human history" by recently retired National Security Agenc

1 minute read

May 23, 2014 | The Recorder

On Haag's Watch, White-Collar Cases Take Dive

SAN FRANCISCO — The last time Silicon Valley was booming, the U.S. attorney's office was in hot pursuit. With Robert Mueller at the helm of the office from 1998 to 2001,

1 minute read

June 21, 2006 | The Recorder

In Brief

ORRICK ATTORNEYS EXPELLED FROM GITMOWASHINGTON � Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe attorneys Yiota Souras and Michael Trinh spent months lining up their first face-to-face meet

1 minute read

April 9, 2009 | New Jersey Law Journal

Bruesewitz v. Wyeth Inc.

Bruesewitz v. Wyeth Inc., No. 07-3794; Third Circuit; opinion by Smith, U.S.C.J.; filed March 27, 2009. Before Judges

1 minute read

July 21, 2010 | New Jersey Law Journal

Approved Congoleum Bankruptcy Plan Puts All Asbestos Claims in Same Boat

After nearly seven years and more than a dozen failed attempts, a reorganization plan allowing Congoleum Corp. to emerge from bankruptcy has finally met with a federal judge's approval. The

1 minute read

July 8, 2010 | New York Law Journal

Food Litigation: The New Frontier

div style="BORDER-BOTTOM: 2px inset; BORDER-LEFT: 2px inset; MARGIN: 0pt 0pt 10px 10px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; WIDTH: 300px; PADDING-RIGHT: 5px; BACKGROUND: rgb(225,238,248); FLOAT: right; BORDER-TOP: 2p

1 minute read

In re ATM Fee Antitrust Litigation

Publication Date: 2012-07-12
Practice Area:
Industry:
Date Filed: 2012-07-12
Court: 9th Cir.
Judge: Charles R. Breyer, District Judge, Presiding Before: Carlos F. Lucero,* Consuelo M. Callahan, and N. Randy Smith, Circuit Judges.
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Joseph R. Saveri, Brendan P. Glackin, and Andew S. Kingsdale, Leiff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, San Francisco, California; Merrill G. Davidoff (argued), Bart D. Cohen, and Michael J. Kane, Berger & Montague, P.C., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for the plaintiffs-appellants.
for defendant: W. Stephen Smith and Deanne E. Maynard (argued), Morrison & Foerster LLP, Washington, D.C.; Robert S. Stern and Sylvia Rivera, Morrison & Foerster LLP, Los Angeles, California, for defendant-appellee J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., successor-in-interest to Bank One, N.A. Sonya D. Winner (argued) and Anita F. Stork, Covington & Burling LLP, San Francisco, California, for defendant-appellee Bank of America, N.A. Stephen V. Bomse, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, LLP, San Francisco, California, for defendant-appellee Suntrust Bank, Inc. David F. Graham and Eric H. Grush, Sidley Austin LLP, Chicago, Illinois, for defendants-appellees Citibank, N.A. and Citibank (West), FSB. Jack R. Nelson, Reed Smith LLP, San Francisco, California, for defendant-appellee Wachovia Corp. Daniel M. Wall and Joshua N. Holian, Latham & Watkins, San Francisco, California, and Donald I. Baker, Baker & Miller, Washington, D.C., for defendants-appellees Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Servus Financial Corp. Peter E. Moll and Brian D. Wallach, Cadwalader, Wickcersham & Taft LLP, Washington, D.C., for defendants-appellees Concord EFS, Inc. and First Data Corp.
Case Number: No. 10-17354

Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 7847 In re: ATM FEE ANTITRUST LITIGATION, PAMELA BRENNAN; TERRY CRAYTON; DARLA MARTINEZ, Plaintiffs-Appel